From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (relay8-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D5FF7F6; Fri, 30 Aug 2024 07:46:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725003964; cv=none; b=r0KoKgs7L4nEWZg6DpqOMpVU4A02E1zVvFBs4NN1MVVu9ZFL6VrqiX7J+d8Gesz2+aWHR46a6EzYQevM6ib6wWMV9O+Xo346r/9dmAUYHDWsfIwSPgFGWT9szFIIwy1KwWfbT1Xw+AqsZXaywyCDv0ACx6ZpIQ1lFc7iHFgkhS8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725003964; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MBG3deIbw+rMvYu6ZqyReRJigYRReHsdhyGiXcxZ4Cg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TITfu9h3Y9apnE0ozrVy4Sf6vOGRMYS+I/slICLpj1bk79b7tkh2UTzG2gDt6oyQKdfP7GP3qSGnG/sPKQoCFvGrBtUob+YIYpKZWpEm8342q24drAi0h4SgCsgua8Pun/pwx74lP6qplW5Znki4MMpwjc+BPZ2N76sWTKOw3Xo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=KkNtioU+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="KkNtioU+" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36B771BF209; Fri, 30 Aug 2024 07:45:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1725003953; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VpebzrTQoNRUKh5ynrlO5Iu8naFvX7FtDOTwf/qOm4A=; b=KkNtioU+WkZU8XZauR1n22NpmH71HFly2u9LmqlUqpZSjxsw4D3GNaQ5b8RXOdRP1vIblG 1BuAc/S3FaJlaTnMaxMPR0UE6gbAg476eLE/QamnjS9z+uIOF2mwRoIfCgwHv835j1RtvW m0zsNyod3wMcqq8cnPB1jN2H1P6rmLDO9HHI5S1UQ/laGZiXm+EjSjV2R6wuv2noboi4nH 3Pq8Msc6rC+4ul0Zncwyhvt9s65q90WrR6JI+3/LBW8ChufwLbugaEO9c6DU+S+OwMiqoi p4PFJKlUzZmlxJsYYFb4y8Su6oy3DiguDX/0m3yFr7XoBLtTPvwInK9gm+PLaw== Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 09:45:49 +0200 From: Miquel Raynal To: Jinjie Ruan Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped() Message-ID: <20240830094549.1c513ba2@xps-13> In-Reply-To: References: <20240826094328.2991664-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> <20240826115213.389acaef@xps-13> <20240826144917.2c4e202d@xps-13> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-GND-Sasl: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com Jinjie, ruanjinjie@huawei.com wrote on Fri, 30 Aug 2024 14:34:38 +0800: > On 2024/8/26 20:49, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > >=20 > > krzk@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 12:19:07 +0200: > > =20 > >> On 26/08/2024 11:52, Miquel Raynal wrote: =20 > >>> Hi Jinjie, > >>> > >>> ruanjinjie@huawei.com wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:43:18 +0800: > >>> =20 > >>>> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating = over > >>>> device nodes to make code a bit simpler. =20 > >>> > >>> Why is this a resend ? Did I miss a previous iteration? =20 > >> > >> You were not cc-ed on previous iteration. I asked for proper split > >> between subsystems and sending to maintainers, thus this resend. =20 > >=20 > > Ok. Makes sense, and the patchset looks fine. =20 >=20 > Hi, Miquel, >=20 > Could this series be merged, thank you! You've sent this series on Monday, we are Friday. I answered a first time within 5h and reviewed it within 8h. So that means I will take the patchset: - when I have the time to do so - after several days to give a chance to other to review it as well - unless someone speaks up against it in a "reasonable time frame" - unless a robot that parses the patches on the mailing lists complains about it (usually within few days, up to a week). In general, a good rule of thumb is to refrain yourself from pinging within 2 weeks for non-urgent matters like this series. Thanks, Miqu=C3=A8l