From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: void@manifault.com
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/11] sched_ext: Move sanity check and dsq_mod_nr() into task_unlink_from_dsq()
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 01:03:51 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240830110415.116090-8-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240830110415.116090-1-tj@kernel.org>
All task_unlink_from_dsq() users are doing dsq_mod_nr(dsq, -1). Move it into
task_unlink_from_dsq(). Also move sanity check into it.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 620cc0586c4b..9befa2bd1eb0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -1641,6 +1641,8 @@ static void dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct task_struct *p,
static void task_unlink_from_dsq(struct task_struct *p,
struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq)
{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&p->scx.dsq_list.node));
+
if (p->scx.dsq_flags & SCX_TASK_DSQ_ON_PRIQ) {
rb_erase(&p->scx.dsq_priq, &dsq->priq);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&p->scx.dsq_priq);
@@ -1648,6 +1650,7 @@ static void task_unlink_from_dsq(struct task_struct *p,
}
list_del_init(&p->scx.dsq_list.node);
+ dsq_mod_nr(dsq, -1);
}
static void dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
@@ -1684,9 +1687,7 @@ static void dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
*/
if (p->scx.holding_cpu < 0) {
/* @p must still be on @dsq, dequeue */
- WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&p->scx.dsq_list.node));
task_unlink_from_dsq(p, dsq);
- dsq_mod_nr(dsq, -1);
} else {
/*
* We're racing against dispatch_to_local_dsq() which already
@@ -2148,7 +2149,6 @@ static void consume_local_task(struct task_struct *p,
WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.holding_cpu >= 0);
task_unlink_from_dsq(p, dsq);
list_add_tail(&p->scx.dsq_list.node, &rq->scx.local_dsq.list);
- dsq_mod_nr(dsq, -1);
dsq_mod_nr(&rq->scx.local_dsq, 1);
p->scx.dsq = &rq->scx.local_dsq;
raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock);
@@ -2238,7 +2238,6 @@ static bool unlink_dsq_and_lock_task_rq(struct task_struct *p,
WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.holding_cpu >= 0);
task_unlink_from_dsq(p, dsq);
- dsq_mod_nr(dsq, -1);
p->scx.holding_cpu = cpu;
raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock);
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-30 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-30 11:03 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 01/11] sched_ext: Rename scx_kfunc_set_sleepable to unlocked and relocate Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 17:45 ` David Vernet
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 02/11] sched_ext: Refactor consume_remote_task() Tejun Heo
2024-08-31 4:05 ` David Vernet
2024-08-31 5:33 ` Tejun Heo
2024-08-31 23:40 ` David Vernet
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 03/11] sched_ext: Make find_dsq_for_dispatch() handle SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 0:11 ` David Vernet
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 04/11] sched_ext: Make dispatch_to_local_dsq() return void Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 17:44 ` [PATCH 04/11] sched_ext: Fix processs_ddsp_deferred_locals() by unifying DTL_INVALID handling Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 0:53 ` David Vernet
2024-09-01 0:56 ` David Vernet
2024-09-01 8:03 ` Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 15:35 ` David Vernet
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 05/11] sched_ext: Restructure dispatch_to_local_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 1:09 ` David Vernet
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 06/11] sched_ext: Reorder args for consume_local/remote_task() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 1:40 ` David Vernet
2024-09-01 6:37 ` Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 11:03 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-09-01 1:42 ` [PATCH 07/11] sched_ext: Move sanity check and dsq_mod_nr() into task_unlink_from_dsq() David Vernet
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 08/11] sched_ext: Move consume_local_task() upward Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 1:43 ` David Vernet
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 09/11] sched_ext: Replace consume_local_task() with move_local_task_to_local_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 1:55 ` David Vernet
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 10/11] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-08-31 14:30 ` Andrea Righi
2024-08-31 16:20 ` Tejun Heo
2024-08-31 21:15 ` Andrea Righi
2024-09-02 1:53 ` Changwoo Min
2024-09-02 5:59 ` Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 11/11] scx_qmap: Implement highpri boosting Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 17:31 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq() Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240830110415.116090-8-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox