From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D78ED2F2E; Sat, 31 Aug 2024 03:39:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725075596; cv=none; b=ZbdXQgtCO6utmIcVaGnb8jjzLcLdPc1e70KEEYV/EXgwHpLylE81DrbtuzReeD3Hl55R6k7yXoErrRbWe8iFJpSTpcpr6vd7G7QmT3BYPdXXByJ7gGotEhSWh2yzMbUamx6rLYDiENAkYoh3hm6uDCMdsxXi2ViNFnB/0fsqNjE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725075596; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E3vRu46hlWxy6N2bSPsweS01OPMGvsArMoRLzr9AZOA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CFER2nUjy1Q41Wk6eN5L1+gcOJVPPhEG/g0nzAhRk4UvvIqKmCxqNjv4RA+2YZ0HJTmxHKRUBlGiUrkyiw2brvILg4gRYgIpm3h7TLF09MwzK05LQ2soHUqnmjZkMolmFKvvR1gZTgCGVlrY1UfOZO2fBng72Jxo8SrrnUfFHIQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=L9+cKLg0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="L9+cKLg0" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1725075595; x=1756611595; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=E3vRu46hlWxy6N2bSPsweS01OPMGvsArMoRLzr9AZOA=; b=L9+cKLg0WZ2Cr9JyIwKfGGX96jbr2yrtMT3BTULMudwPp3+aKNxjDySc Ncba3EjidJI7weOZw6IGj2gjKZvb1DpQU5opc3HZ+n8WO8IblfAM99jlT O03OFMZB2zdc145kWjAyOm+Dne+LRdm5V2tVhzUAYcsLJ6TABZmZgaQWj NaoTAf1W0d9N1zKn4GsPWOBhG70JufkEXqCtQSJ8GJ7i72vvie61jrptV gQwLANGfETJzVj6us4YZnZcRU8SN2J1kYCmP3qGxFNasExkG4+voHJM/l GM4xUOJw3DLzS0VPAyGmwnGtPL1wxhdZHJzry+PMZmzr33D2QvEfHBDRC w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /CjWC7IrSoqKniAQTwLhyw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MOe9c4Y8Sp2bAsjnK47jFA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11180"; a="23592806" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,190,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="23592806" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Aug 2024 20:39:54 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: e3zhyya4TkGgJU8661giWg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: FVPujpNEQdiXXGkrmCT8Gw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,190,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="68740810" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 9c6b1c7d3b50) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Aug 2024 20:39:45 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 9c6b1c7d3b50 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1skExj-0002KF-1g; Sat, 31 Aug 2024 03:39:43 +0000 Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 11:39:13 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Billy Tsai , linus.walleij@linaro.org, brgl@bgdev.pl, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, joel@jms.id.au, andrew@codeconstruct.com.au, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, BMC-SW@aspeedtech.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] gpio: aspeed: Support G7 Aspeed gpio controller Message-ID: <202408311104.T3i0AxEf-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240830034047.2251482-5-billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240830034047.2251482-5-billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com> Hi Billy, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on brgl/gpio/for-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.11-rc5 next-20240830] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Billy-Tsai/dt-bindings-gpio-aspeed-ast2400-gpio-Support-ast2700/20240830-114325 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux.git gpio/for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240830034047.2251482-5-billy_tsai%40aspeedtech.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] gpio: aspeed: Support G7 Aspeed gpio controller config: openrisc-randconfig-r131-20240830 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240831/202408311104.T3i0AxEf-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240831/202408311104.T3i0AxEf-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408311104.T3i0AxEf-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed.c:1181:26: sparse: sparse: symbol 'aspeed_g4_llops' was not declared. Should it be static? >> drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed.c:1215:26: sparse: sparse: symbol 'aspeed_g7_llops' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/aspeed_g7_llops +1215 drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed.c 1214 > 1215 struct aspeed_gpio_llops aspeed_g7_llops = { 1216 .copro_request = NULL, 1217 .copro_release = NULL, 1218 .reg_bits_set = aspeed_g7_reg_bits_set, 1219 .reg_bits_read = aspeed_g7_reg_bits_read, 1220 }; 1221 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki