public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] sched_ext: Replace consume_local_task() with move_local_task_to_local_dsq()
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 20:55:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240901015553.GJ70166@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240830110415.116090-10-tj@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4281 bytes --]

On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 01:03:53AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> - Rename move_task_to_local_dsq() to move_remote_task_to_local_dsq().
> 
> - Rename consume_local_task() to move_local_task_to_local_dsq() and remove
>   task_unlink_from_dsq() and source DSQ unlocking from it.
> 
> This is to make the migration code easier to reuse.
> 
> No functional changes intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>

> ---
>  kernel/sched/ext.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index 51d141602a11..df33524d68f3 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -2103,23 +2103,30 @@ static bool yield_to_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *to)
>  		return false;
>  }
>  
> -static void consume_local_task(struct task_struct *p,
> -			       struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct rq *rq)
> +static void move_local_task_to_local_dsq(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
> +					 struct scx_dispatch_q *src_dsq,
> +					 struct rq *dst_rq)
>  {
> -	lockdep_assert_held(&dsq->lock);	/* released on return */
> +	struct scx_dispatch_q *dst_dsq = &dst_rq->scx.local_dsq;
> +
> +	/* @dsq is locked and @p is on @dst_rq */
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&src_dsq->lock);
> +	lockdep_assert_rq_held(dst_rq);
>  
> -	/* @dsq is locked and @p is on this rq */
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.holding_cpu >= 0);
> -	task_unlink_from_dsq(p, dsq);
> -	list_add_tail(&p->scx.dsq_list.node, &rq->scx.local_dsq.list);
> -	dsq_mod_nr(&rq->scx.local_dsq, 1);
> -	p->scx.dsq = &rq->scx.local_dsq;
> -	raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock);
> +
> +	if (enq_flags & (SCX_ENQ_HEAD | SCX_ENQ_PREEMPT))
> +		list_add(&p->scx.dsq_list.node, &dst_dsq->list);
> +	else
> +		list_add_tail(&p->scx.dsq_list.node, &dst_dsq->list);
> +
> +	dsq_mod_nr(dst_dsq, 1);
> +	p->scx.dsq = dst_dsq;
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  /**
> - * move_task_to_local_dsq - Move a task from a different rq to a local DSQ
> + * move_remote_task_to_local_dsq - Move a task from a foreign rq to a local DSQ
>   * @p: task to move
>   * @enq_flags: %SCX_ENQ_*
>   * @src_rq: rq to move the task from, locked on entry, released on return
> @@ -2127,8 +2134,8 @@ static void consume_local_task(struct task_struct *p,
>   *
>   * Move @p which is currently on @src_rq to @dst_rq's local DSQ.
>   */
> -static void move_task_to_local_dsq(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
> -				   struct rq *src_rq, struct rq *dst_rq)
> +static void move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
> +					  struct rq *src_rq, struct rq *dst_rq)
>  {
>  	lockdep_assert_rq_held(src_rq);
>  
> @@ -2251,7 +2258,7 @@ static bool consume_remote_task(struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *p,
>  	raw_spin_rq_unlock(this_rq);
>  
>  	if (unlink_dsq_and_lock_task_rq(p, dsq, task_rq)) {
> -		move_task_to_local_dsq(p, 0, task_rq, this_rq);
> +		move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(p, 0, task_rq, this_rq);
>  		return true;
>  	} else {
>  		raw_spin_rq_unlock(task_rq);
> @@ -2282,7 +2289,9 @@ static bool consume_dispatch_q(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq)
>  		struct rq *task_rq = task_rq(p);
>  
>  		if (rq == task_rq) {
> -			consume_local_task(p, dsq, rq);
> +			task_unlink_from_dsq(p, dsq);
> +			move_local_task_to_local_dsq(p, 0, dsq, rq);
> +			raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock);
>  			return true;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -2362,13 +2371,14 @@ static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dst_dsq,
>  		/*
>  		 * If @p is staying on the same rq, there's no need to go
>  		 * through the full deactivate/activate cycle. Optimize by
> -		 * abbreviating the operations in move_task_to_local_dsq().
> +		 * abbreviating move_remote_task_to_local_dsq().
>  		 */
>  		if (src_rq == dst_rq) {
>  			p->scx.holding_cpu = -1;
>  			dispatch_enqueue(&dst_rq->scx.local_dsq, p, enq_flags);
>  		} else {
> -			move_task_to_local_dsq(p, enq_flags, src_rq, dst_rq);
> +			move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(p, enq_flags,
> +						      src_rq, dst_rq);
>  		}
>  
>  		/* if the destination CPU is idle, wake it up */
> -- 
> 2.46.0
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-01  1:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-30 11:03 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 01/11] sched_ext: Rename scx_kfunc_set_sleepable to unlocked and relocate Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 17:45   ` David Vernet
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 02/11] sched_ext: Refactor consume_remote_task() Tejun Heo
2024-08-31  4:05   ` David Vernet
2024-08-31  5:33     ` Tejun Heo
2024-08-31 23:40       ` David Vernet
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 03/11] sched_ext: Make find_dsq_for_dispatch() handle SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON Tejun Heo
2024-09-01  0:11   ` David Vernet
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 04/11] sched_ext: Make dispatch_to_local_dsq() return void Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 17:44   ` [PATCH 04/11] sched_ext: Fix processs_ddsp_deferred_locals() by unifying DTL_INVALID handling Tejun Heo
2024-09-01  0:53     ` David Vernet
2024-09-01  0:56       ` David Vernet
2024-09-01  8:03         ` Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 15:35           ` David Vernet
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 05/11] sched_ext: Restructure dispatch_to_local_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01  1:09   ` David Vernet
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 06/11] sched_ext: Reorder args for consume_local/remote_task() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01  1:40   ` David Vernet
2024-09-01  6:37     ` Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 07/11] sched_ext: Move sanity check and dsq_mod_nr() into task_unlink_from_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01  1:42   ` David Vernet
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 08/11] sched_ext: Move consume_local_task() upward Tejun Heo
2024-09-01  1:43   ` David Vernet
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 09/11] sched_ext: Replace consume_local_task() with move_local_task_to_local_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01  1:55   ` David Vernet [this message]
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 10/11] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-08-31 14:30   ` Andrea Righi
2024-08-31 16:20     ` Tejun Heo
2024-08-31 21:15       ` Andrea Righi
2024-09-02  1:53         ` Changwoo Min
2024-09-02  5:59           ` Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 11:03 ` [PATCH 11/11] scx_qmap: Implement highpri boosting Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 20:59   ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 17:31 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq() Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240901015553.GJ70166@maniforge \
    --to=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox