public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: void@manifault.com
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/12] sched_ext: Replace consume_local_task() with move_local_task_to_local_dsq()
Date: Sun,  1 Sep 2024 06:43:46 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240901164417.779239-10-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240901164417.779239-1-tj@kernel.org>

- Rename move_task_to_local_dsq() to move_remote_task_to_local_dsq().

- Rename consume_local_task() to move_local_task_to_local_dsq() and remove
  task_unlink_from_dsq() and source DSQ unlocking from it.

This is to make the migration code easier to reuse.

No functional changes intended.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 kernel/sched/ext.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index e0bc4851b6e2..d50166a2651a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -2101,23 +2101,30 @@ static bool yield_to_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *to)
 		return false;
 }
 
-static void consume_local_task(struct task_struct *p,
-			       struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct rq *rq)
+static void move_local_task_to_local_dsq(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
+					 struct scx_dispatch_q *src_dsq,
+					 struct rq *dst_rq)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&dsq->lock);	/* released on return */
+	struct scx_dispatch_q *dst_dsq = &dst_rq->scx.local_dsq;
+
+	/* @dsq is locked and @p is on @dst_rq */
+	lockdep_assert_held(&src_dsq->lock);
+	lockdep_assert_rq_held(dst_rq);
 
-	/* @dsq is locked and @p is on this rq */
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.holding_cpu >= 0);
-	task_unlink_from_dsq(p, dsq);
-	list_add_tail(&p->scx.dsq_list.node, &rq->scx.local_dsq.list);
-	dsq_mod_nr(&rq->scx.local_dsq, 1);
-	p->scx.dsq = &rq->scx.local_dsq;
-	raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock);
+
+	if (enq_flags & (SCX_ENQ_HEAD | SCX_ENQ_PREEMPT))
+		list_add(&p->scx.dsq_list.node, &dst_dsq->list);
+	else
+		list_add_tail(&p->scx.dsq_list.node, &dst_dsq->list);
+
+	dsq_mod_nr(dst_dsq, 1);
+	p->scx.dsq = dst_dsq;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 /**
- * move_task_to_local_dsq - Move a task from a different rq to a local DSQ
+ * move_remote_task_to_local_dsq - Move a task from a foreign rq to a local DSQ
  * @p: task to move
  * @enq_flags: %SCX_ENQ_*
  * @src_rq: rq to move the task from, locked on entry, released on return
@@ -2125,8 +2132,8 @@ static void consume_local_task(struct task_struct *p,
  *
  * Move @p which is currently on @src_rq to @dst_rq's local DSQ.
  */
-static void move_task_to_local_dsq(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
-				   struct rq *src_rq, struct rq *dst_rq)
+static void move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
+					  struct rq *src_rq, struct rq *dst_rq)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_rq_held(src_rq);
 
@@ -2249,7 +2256,7 @@ static bool consume_remote_task(struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *p,
 	raw_spin_rq_unlock(this_rq);
 
 	if (unlink_dsq_and_lock_src_rq(p, dsq, src_rq)) {
-		move_task_to_local_dsq(p, 0, src_rq, this_rq);
+		move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(p, 0, src_rq, this_rq);
 		return true;
 	} else {
 		raw_spin_rq_unlock(src_rq);
@@ -2280,7 +2287,9 @@ static bool consume_dispatch_q(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq)
 		struct rq *task_rq = task_rq(p);
 
 		if (rq == task_rq) {
-			consume_local_task(p, dsq, rq);
+			task_unlink_from_dsq(p, dsq);
+			move_local_task_to_local_dsq(p, 0, dsq, rq);
+			raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock);
 			return true;
 		}
 
@@ -2360,13 +2369,14 @@ static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dst_dsq,
 		/*
 		 * If @p is staying on the same rq, there's no need to go
 		 * through the full deactivate/activate cycle. Optimize by
-		 * abbreviating the operations in move_task_to_local_dsq().
+		 * abbreviating move_remote_task_to_local_dsq().
 		 */
 		if (src_rq == dst_rq) {
 			p->scx.holding_cpu = -1;
 			dispatch_enqueue(&dst_rq->scx.local_dsq, p, enq_flags);
 		} else {
-			move_task_to_local_dsq(p, enq_flags, src_rq, dst_rq);
+			move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(p, enq_flags,
+						      src_rq, dst_rq);
 		}
 
 		/* if the destination CPU is idle, wake it up */
-- 
2.46.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-01 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-01 16:43 [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 01/12] sched_ext: Rename scx_kfunc_set_sleepable to unlocked and relocate Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 02/12] sched_ext: Refactor consume_remote_task() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 03/12] sched_ext: Make find_dsq_for_dispatch() handle SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 04/12] sched_ext: Fix processs_ddsp_deferred_locals() by unifying DTL_INVALID handling Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 05/12] sched_ext: Restructure dispatch_to_local_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 06/12] sched_ext: Reorder args for consume_local/remote_task() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 07/12] sched_ext: Move sanity check and dsq_mod_nr() into task_unlink_from_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 08/12] sched_ext: Move consume_local_task() upward Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 10/12] sched_ext: Compact struct bpf_iter_scx_dsq_kern Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 11/12] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 12/12] scx_qmap: Implement highpri boosting Tejun Heo
2024-09-04 20:27 ` [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq() Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240901164417.779239-10-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox