public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: void@manifault.com
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] sched_ext: Fix processs_ddsp_deferred_locals() by unifying DTL_INVALID handling
Date: Sun,  1 Sep 2024 06:43:41 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240901164417.779239-5-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240901164417.779239-1-tj@kernel.org>

With the preceding update, the only return value which makes meaningful
difference is DTL_INVALID, for which one caller, finish_dispatch(), falls
back to the global DSQ and the other, process_ddsp_deferred_locals(),
doesn't do anything.

It should always fallback to the global DSQ. Move the global DSQ fallback
into dispatch_to_local_dsq() and remove the return value.

v2: Patch title and description updated to reflect the behavior fix for
    process_ddsp_deferred_locals().

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 kernel/sched/ext.c | 41 ++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 1d35298ee561..ec61ab676517 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -2299,12 +2299,6 @@ static bool consume_dispatch_q(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq)
 	return false;
 }
 
-enum dispatch_to_local_dsq_ret {
-	DTL_DISPATCHED,		/* successfully dispatched */
-	DTL_LOST,		/* lost race to dequeue */
-	DTL_INVALID,		/* invalid local dsq_id */
-};
-
 /**
  * dispatch_to_local_dsq - Dispatch a task to a local dsq
  * @rq: current rq which is locked
@@ -2319,9 +2313,8 @@ enum dispatch_to_local_dsq_ret {
  * The caller must have exclusive ownership of @p (e.g. through
  * %SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING).
  */
-static enum dispatch_to_local_dsq_ret
-dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dst_dsq,
-		      struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags)
+static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dst_dsq,
+				  struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags)
 {
 	struct rq *src_rq = task_rq(p);
 	struct rq *dst_rq = container_of(dst_dsq, struct rq, scx.local_dsq);
@@ -2334,13 +2327,11 @@ dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dst_dsq,
 	 */
 	if (rq == src_rq && rq == dst_rq) {
 		dispatch_enqueue(dst_dsq, p, enq_flags | SCX_ENQ_CLEAR_OPSS);
-		return DTL_DISPATCHED;
+		return;
 	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	if (likely(task_can_run_on_remote_rq(p, dst_rq, true))) {
-		bool dsp;
-
 		/*
 		 * @p is on a possibly remote @src_rq which we need to lock to
 		 * move the task. If dequeue is in progress, it'd be locking
@@ -2365,10 +2356,8 @@ dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dst_dsq,
 		}
 
 		/* task_rq couldn't have changed if we're still the holding cpu */
-		dsp = p->scx.holding_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id() &&
-			!WARN_ON_ONCE(src_rq != task_rq(p));
-
-		if (likely(dsp)) {
+		if (likely(p->scx.holding_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id()) &&
+		    !WARN_ON_ONCE(src_rq != task_rq(p))) {
 			/*
 			 * If @p is staying on the same rq, there's no need to
 			 * go through the full deactivate/activate cycle.
@@ -2396,11 +2385,11 @@ dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dst_dsq,
 			raw_spin_rq_lock(rq);
 		}
 
-		return dsp ? DTL_DISPATCHED : DTL_LOST;
+		return;
 	}
 #endif	/* CONFIG_SMP */
 
-	return DTL_INVALID;
+	dispatch_enqueue(&scx_dsq_global, p, enq_flags | SCX_ENQ_CLEAR_OPSS);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2477,20 +2466,10 @@ static void finish_dispatch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
 
 	dsq = find_dsq_for_dispatch(this_rq(), dsq_id, p);
 
-	if (dsq->id == SCX_DSQ_LOCAL) {
-		switch (dispatch_to_local_dsq(rq, dsq, p, enq_flags)) {
-		case DTL_DISPATCHED:
-			break;
-		case DTL_LOST:
-			break;
-		case DTL_INVALID:
-			dispatch_enqueue(&scx_dsq_global, p,
-					 enq_flags | SCX_ENQ_CLEAR_OPSS);
-			break;
-		}
-	} else {
+	if (dsq->id == SCX_DSQ_LOCAL)
+		dispatch_to_local_dsq(rq, dsq, p, enq_flags);
+	else
 		dispatch_enqueue(dsq, p, enq_flags | SCX_ENQ_CLEAR_OPSS);
-	}
 }
 
 static void flush_dispatch_buf(struct rq *rq)
-- 
2.46.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-01 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-01 16:43 [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 01/12] sched_ext: Rename scx_kfunc_set_sleepable to unlocked and relocate Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 02/12] sched_ext: Refactor consume_remote_task() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 03/12] sched_ext: Make find_dsq_for_dispatch() handle SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 05/12] sched_ext: Restructure dispatch_to_local_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 06/12] sched_ext: Reorder args for consume_local/remote_task() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 07/12] sched_ext: Move sanity check and dsq_mod_nr() into task_unlink_from_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 08/12] sched_ext: Move consume_local_task() upward Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 09/12] sched_ext: Replace consume_local_task() with move_local_task_to_local_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 10/12] sched_ext: Compact struct bpf_iter_scx_dsq_kern Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 11/12] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-09-01 16:43 ` [PATCH 12/12] scx_qmap: Implement highpri boosting Tejun Heo
2024-09-04 20:27 ` [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq() Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240901164417.779239-5-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox