From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Tina Zhang <tina.zhang@intel.com>,
Sanjay K Kumar <sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 13/14] iommu/vt-d: Add qi_batch for dmar_domain
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 10:27:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240902022724.67059-14-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240902022724.67059-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Introduces a qi_batch structure to hold batched cache invalidation
descriptors on a per-dmar_domain basis. A fixed-size descriptor
array is used for simplicity. The qi_batch is allocated when the
first cache tag is added to the domain and freed during
iommu_free_domain().
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tina Zhang <tina.zhang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240815065221.50328-4-tina.zhang@intel.com
---
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c | 7 +++++++
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 1 +
drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c | 1 +
drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 5 ++++-
5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
index ba40db4f8399..428d253f1348 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
@@ -584,6 +584,19 @@ struct iommu_domain_info {
* to VT-d spec, section 9.3 */
};
+/*
+ * We start simply by using a fixed size for the batched descriptors. This
+ * size is currently sufficient for our needs. Future improvements could
+ * involve dynamically allocating the batch buffer based on actual demand,
+ * allowing us to adjust the batch size for optimal performance in different
+ * scenarios.
+ */
+#define QI_MAX_BATCHED_DESC_COUNT 16
+struct qi_batch {
+ struct qi_desc descs[QI_MAX_BATCHED_DESC_COUNT];
+ unsigned int index;
+};
+
struct dmar_domain {
int nid; /* node id */
struct xarray iommu_array; /* Attached IOMMU array */
@@ -608,6 +621,7 @@ struct dmar_domain {
spinlock_t cache_lock; /* Protect the cache tag list */
struct list_head cache_tags; /* Cache tag list */
+ struct qi_batch *qi_batch; /* Batched QI descriptors */
int iommu_superpage;/* Level of superpages supported:
0 == 4KiB (no superpages), 1 == 2MiB,
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c
index 08f7ce2c16c3..2e997d782beb 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c
@@ -190,6 +190,13 @@ int cache_tag_assign_domain(struct dmar_domain *domain,
u16 did = domain_get_id_for_dev(domain, dev);
int ret;
+ /* domain->qi_bach will be freed in iommu_free_domain() path. */
+ if (!domain->qi_batch) {
+ domain->qi_batch = kzalloc(sizeof(*domain->qi_batch), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!domain->qi_batch)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
ret = __cache_tag_assign_domain(domain, did, dev, pasid);
if (ret || domain->domain.type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED)
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index 779e258188cd..0500022e789e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -1572,6 +1572,7 @@ static void domain_exit(struct dmar_domain *domain)
if (WARN_ON(!list_empty(&domain->devices)))
return;
+ kfree(domain->qi_batch);
kfree(domain);
}
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c
index 36a91b1b52be..433c58944401 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ static void intel_nested_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
spin_lock(&s2_domain->s1_lock);
list_del(&dmar_domain->s2_link);
spin_unlock(&s2_domain->s1_lock);
+ kfree(dmar_domain->qi_batch);
kfree(dmar_domain);
}
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index ef12e95e400a..078d1e32a24e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -184,7 +184,10 @@ static void intel_mm_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm)
static void intel_mm_free_notifier(struct mmu_notifier *mn)
{
- kfree(container_of(mn, struct dmar_domain, notifier));
+ struct dmar_domain *domain = container_of(mn, struct dmar_domain, notifier);
+
+ kfree(domain->qi_batch);
+ kfree(domain);
}
static const struct mmu_notifier_ops intel_mmuops = {
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-02 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-02 2:27 [PATCH 00/14] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for v6.12 Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 01/14] iommu/vt-d: Require DMA domain if hardware not support passthrough Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 02/14] iommu/vt-d: Remove identity mappings from si_domain Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 03/14] iommu/vt-d: Always reserve a domain ID for identity setup Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 04/14] iommu/vt-d: Remove has_iotlb_device flag Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 05/14] iommu/vt-d: Factor out helpers from domain_context_mapping_one() Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 06/14] iommu/vt-d: Add support for static identity domain Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 07/14] iommu/vt-d: Cleanup si_domain Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 08/14] iommu/vt-d: Fix potential lockup if qi_submit_sync called with 0 count Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 09/14] iommu/vt-d: Move PCI PASID enablement to probe path Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 10/14] iommu/vt-d: Unconditionally flush device TLB for pasid table updates Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 11/14] iommu/vt-d: Factor out invalidation descriptor composition Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 12/14] iommu/vt-d: Refactor IOTLB and Dev-IOTLB flush for batching Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 14/14] iommu/vt-d: Introduce batched cache invalidation Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 16:15 ` [PATCH 00/14] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for v6.12 Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240902022724.67059-14-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com \
--cc=tina.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox