From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Use ktime_get_ns() instead of rq_clock_task() in touch_core_sched()
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:59:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240902095918.GE4723@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240830174014.GD5055@maniforge>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 12:40:14PM -0500, David Vernet wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 12:52:48AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Since sched_ext: Unpin and repin rq lock from balance_scx(), sched_ext's
> > balance path terminates rq_pin in the outermost function. This is simpler
> > and in line with what other balance functions are doing but it loses control
> > over rq->clock_update_flags which makes assert_clock_udpated() trigger if
> > other CPUs pins the rq lock.
> >
> > The only place this matters is touch_core_sched() which uses the timestamp
> > to order tasks from sibling rq's. For now, switch to ktime_get_ns(). Later,
> > it'd be better to use per-core dispatch sequence number.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > Fixes: 3cf78c5d01d6 ("sched_ext: Unpin and repin rq lock from balance_scx()")
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/ext.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> > @@ -1453,13 +1453,20 @@ static void schedule_deferred(struct rq
> > */
> > static void touch_core_sched(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> > {
> > + lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> > /*
> > * It's okay to update the timestamp spuriously. Use
> > * sched_core_disabled() which is cheaper than enabled().
> > + *
> > + * TODO: ktime_get_ns() is used because rq_clock_task() can't be used as
> > + * SCX balance path doesn't pin the rq. As this is used to determine
> > + * ordering between tasks of sibling CPUs, it'd be better to use
> > + * per-core dispatch sequence instead.
> > */
> > if (!sched_core_disabled())
> > - p->scx.core_sched_at = rq_clock_task(rq);
> > + p->scx.core_sched_at = ktime_get_ns();
>
> Should we just use sched_clock_cpu()? That's what rq->clock is updated
> from, and it's what fair.c does on the balance path when the rq lock is
> unpinned.
Right, so on x86 with wobbly TSC (still possible in this day and age)
ktime *must* use the HPET, while sched_clock_cpu() makes an 'educated'
guess using TSC and tick based HPET stamps and windows.
IOW, on same machines it doesn't matter much, but for the HPET case the
sched_clock() thing is a lot faster.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-02 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-30 10:51 [PATCH 1/2 sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Use task_can_run_on_remote_rq() test in dispatch_to_local_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 10:52 ` [PATCH 2/2 sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Use ktime_get_ns() instead of rq_clock_task() in touch_core_sched() Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 17:40 ` David Vernet
2024-08-30 17:45 ` Tejun Heo
2024-09-02 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2024-08-30 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/2 sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Use sched_clock_cpu() " Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 18:01 ` David Vernet
2024-08-31 5:36 ` Tejun Heo
2024-08-30 17:22 ` [PATCH 1/2 sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Use task_can_run_on_remote_rq() test in dispatch_to_local_dsq() David Vernet
2024-08-30 17:35 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240902095918.GE4723@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox