From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] perf tools: Check fallback error and order
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 23:41:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240904064131.2377873-9-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240904064131.2377873-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
The perf_event_open might fail due to various reasons, so blindly
reducing precise_ip level might not be the best way to deal with it.
It seems the kernel return -EOPNOTSUPP when PMU doesn't support the
given precise level. Let's try again with the correct error code.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index 8c4d70f7b2f5b880..0133c9ad3ce07a24 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -2565,9 +2565,6 @@ static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
return 0;
try_fallback:
- if (evsel__precise_ip_fallback(evsel))
- goto retry_open;
-
if (evsel__ignore_missing_thread(evsel, perf_cpu_map__nr(cpus),
idx, threads, thread, err)) {
/* We just removed 1 thread, so lower the upper nthreads limit. */
@@ -2584,11 +2581,12 @@ static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
if (err == -EMFILE && rlimit__increase_nofile(&set_rlimit))
goto retry_open;
- if (err != -EINVAL || idx > 0 || thread > 0)
- goto out_close;
+ if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP && evsel__precise_ip_fallback(evsel))
+ goto retry_open;
- if (evsel__detect_missing_features(evsel))
+ if (err == -EINVAL && evsel__detect_missing_features(evsel))
goto fallback_missing_features;
+
out_close:
if (err)
threads->err_thread = thread;
--
2.46.0.469.g59c65b2a67-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-04 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-04 6:41 [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Do not set attr.exclude_guest by default (v2) Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04 6:41 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf tools: Don't set attr.exclude_guest by default Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04 13:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-04 15:43 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04 6:41 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf tools: Simplify evsel__add_modifier() Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04 6:41 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf stat: Add --exclude-guest option Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04 6:41 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf tools: Do not set exclude_guest for precise_ip Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04 6:41 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf tools: Detect missing kernel features properly Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04 6:41 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf tools: Separate exclude_hv fallback Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04 6:41 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf tools: Add fallback for exclude_guest Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04 13:28 ` James Clark
2024-09-04 13:29 ` James Clark
2024-09-04 13:36 ` James Clark
2024-09-04 15:52 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04 6:41 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2024-09-04 16:19 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf tools: Check fallback error and order Ian Rogers
2024-09-04 18:15 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04 16:36 ` [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Do not set attr.exclude_guest by default (v2) Ian Rogers
2024-09-04 17:46 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240904064131.2377873-9-namhyung@kernel.org \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox