From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Yenchia Chen <yenchia.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 1/1] PM: sleep: Restore asynchronous device resume optimization
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 16:19:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024090420-protozoan-clench-cca7@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240902093249.17275-2-yenchia.chen@mediatek.com>
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 05:32:48PM +0800, Yenchia Chen wrote:
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> commit 3e999770ac1c7c31a70685dd5b88e89473509e9c upstream.
>
> Before commit 7839d0078e0d ("PM: sleep: Fix possible deadlocks in core
> system-wide PM code"), the resume of devices that were allowed to resume
> asynchronously was scheduled before starting the resume of the other
> devices, so the former did not have to wait for the latter unless
> functional dependencies were present.
>
> Commit 7839d0078e0d removed that optimization in order to address a
> correctness issue, but it can be restored with the help of a new device
> power management flag, so do that now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yenchia Chen <yenchia.chen@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/main.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> include/linux/pm.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
Why does this need to be backported? What bug is it fixing?
confused,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-04 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-02 9:32 [PATCH 6.6 0/1] pm, restore async device resume optimization Yenchia Chen
2024-09-02 9:32 ` [PATCH 6.6 1/1] PM: sleep: Restore asynchronous " Yenchia Chen
2024-09-04 14:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2024-09-05 9:34 ` Yenchia Chen
2024-09-05 9:38 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024090420-protozoan-clench-cca7@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yenchia.chen@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox