From: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
To: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Philipp Stanner" <pstanner@redhat.com>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] PCI: Fix potential deadlock in pcim_intx()
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 09:25:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240905072556.11375-2-pstanner@redhat.com> (raw)
commit 25216afc9db5 ("PCI: Add managed pcim_intx()") moved the
allocation step for pci_intx()'s device resource from
pcim_enable_device() to pcim_intx(). As before, pcim_enable_device()
sets pci_dev.is_managed to true; and it is never set to false again.
Due to the lifecycle of a struct pci_dev, it can happen that a second
driver obtains the same pci_dev after a first driver ran.
If one driver uses pcim_enable_device() and the other doesn't,
this causes the other driver to run into managed pcim_intx(), which will
try to allocate when called for the first time.
Allocations might sleep, so calling pci_intx() while holding spinlocks
becomes then invalid, which causes lockdep warnings and could cause
deadlocks:
========================================================
WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
6.11.0-rc6+ #59 Tainted: G W
--------------------------------------------------------
CPU 0/KVM/1537 just changed the state of lock:
ffffa0f0cff965f0 (&vdev->irqlock){-...}-{2:2}, at:
vfio_intx_handler+0x21/0xd0 [vfio_pci_core] but this lock took another,
HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past: (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}
and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
local_irq_disable();
lock(&vdev->irqlock);
lock(fs_reclaim);
<Interrupt>
lock(&vdev->irqlock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Have pcim_enable_device()'s release function, pcim_disable_device(), set
pci_dev.is_managed to false so that subsequent drivers using the same
struct pci_dev do implicitly run into managed code.
Fixes: 25216afc9db5 ("PCI: Add managed pcim_intx()")
Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240903094431.63551744.alex.williamson@redhat.com/
Suggested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
---
@Bjorn:
This problem was introduced in the v6.11 merge window. So one might
consider getting it into mainline before v6.11.0 gets tagged.
P.
---
drivers/pci/devres.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/devres.c b/drivers/pci/devres.c
index 3780a9f9ec00..c7affbbf73ab 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/devres.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/devres.c
@@ -483,6 +483,8 @@ static void pcim_disable_device(void *pdev_raw)
if (!pdev->pinned)
pci_disable_device(pdev);
+
+ pdev->is_managed = false;
}
/**
--
2.46.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-09-05 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-05 7:25 Philipp Stanner [this message]
2024-09-06 0:38 ` [PATCH v2] PCI: Fix potential deadlock in pcim_intx() Damien Le Moal
2024-09-11 14:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-12 7:18 ` Philipp Stanner
2024-09-12 12:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240905072556.11375-2-pstanner@redhat.com \
--to=pstanner@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox