From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: shuah@kernel.org, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
reinette.chatre@intel.com, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
usama.anjum@collabora.com
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] selftests:resctrl: Fix build failure on archs without __cpuid_count()
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 12:02:31 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240905180231.20920-1-skhan@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
When resctrl is built on architectures without __cpuid_count()
support, build fails. resctrl uses __cpuid_count() defined in
kselftest.h.
Even though the problem is seen while building resctrl on aarch64,
this error can be seen on any platform that doesn't support CPUID.
CPUID is a x86/x86-64 feature and code paths with CPUID asm commands
will fail to build on all other architectures.
All others tests call __cpuid_count() do so from x86/x86_64 code paths
when _i386__ or __x86_64__ are defined. resctrl is an exception.
Fix the problem by defining __cpuid_count() only when __i386__ or
__x86_64__ are defined in kselftest.h and changing resctrl to call
__cpuid_count() only when __i386__ or __x86_64__ are defined.
In file included from resctrl.h:24,
from cat_test.c:11:
In function ‘arch_supports_noncont_cat’,
inlined from ‘noncont_cat_run_test’ at cat_test.c:326:6:
../kselftest.h:74:9: error: impossible constraint in ‘asm’
74 | __asm__ __volatile__ ("cpuid\n\t" \
| ^~~~~~~
cat_test.c:304:17: note: in expansion of macro ‘__cpuid_count’
304 | __cpuid_count(0x10, 1, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
../kselftest.h:74:9: error: impossible constraint in ‘asm’
74 | __asm__ __volatile__ ("cpuid\n\t" \
| ^~~~~~~
cat_test.c:306:17: note: in expansion of macro ‘__cpuid_count’
306 | __cpuid_count(0x10, 2, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
Reported-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Reported-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h | 2 ++
tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c | 6 ++++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
index b8967b6e29d5..e195ec156859 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
#define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]))
#endif
+#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* arch */
/*
* gcc cpuid.h provides __cpuid_count() since v4.4.
* Clang/LLVM cpuid.h provides __cpuid_count() since v3.4.0.
@@ -75,6 +76,7 @@
: "=a" (a), "=b" (b), "=c" (c), "=d" (d) \
: "0" (level), "2" (count))
#endif
+#endif /* end arch */
/* define kselftest exit codes */
#define KSFT_PASS 0
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
index 742782438ca3..ae3f0fa5390b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
@@ -290,12 +290,12 @@ static int cat_run_test(const struct resctrl_test *test, const struct user_param
static bool arch_supports_noncont_cat(const struct resctrl_test *test)
{
- unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
-
/* AMD always supports non-contiguous CBM. */
if (get_vendor() == ARCH_AMD)
return true;
+#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* arch */
+ unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
/* Intel support for non-contiguous CBM needs to be discovered. */
if (!strcmp(test->resource, "L3"))
__cpuid_count(0x10, 1, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
@@ -305,6 +305,8 @@ static bool arch_supports_noncont_cat(const struct resctrl_test *test)
return false;
return ((ecx >> 3) & 1);
+#endif /* end arch */
+ return false;
}
static int noncont_cat_run_test(const struct resctrl_test *test,
--
2.40.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-09-05 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-05 18:02 Shuah Khan [this message]
2024-09-05 20:45 ` [PATCH] selftests:resctrl: Fix build failure on archs without __cpuid_count() Reinette Chatre
2024-09-05 20:50 ` Shuah Khan
2024-09-06 7:35 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-09-06 14:15 ` Shuah Khan
2024-09-06 10:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-09-06 14:14 ` Shuah Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240905180231.20920-1-skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox