From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Angelo Dureghello" <adureghello@baylibre.com>,
"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>, "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Olivier Moysan" <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] iio: dac: ad3552r: add axi platform driver
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 16:49:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240908164940.7c4ffb8a@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b289a789-0440-4c1f-9f75-6d7e8e04189d@baylibre.com>
On Thu, 5 Sep 2024 15:40:11 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> On 9/5/24 10:17 AM, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
>
> ...
One reply to a comment David made.
Jonathan
>
> > + */
> > + if (st->single_channel)
> > + clk_rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(clk_rate, 4);
> > + else
> > + clk_rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(clk_rate, 8);
> > +
>
> Having the sample rate depend on how many channels are enabled in
> the buffer seems a bit odd. Sampling frequency is not strictly
> defined in IIO, so I think it would be fine to always return the
> same value no matter how many channels are enabled.
>
> We will just need to document that the sampling frequency is the
> rate per sample, not per channel. So if two channels are enabled,
> the effective sampling rate per channel is 1/2 of the sampling
> rate reported by the sysfs attribute.
There is an oddity around this that we've never cleared up fully.
In my head at least if there is a single sampling_frequency it
applies to 'scans', not individual channel reads (so would change
with the number of channels enabled). If there
is a per channel attribute we do have documentation:
What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_voltageX_sampling_frequency
What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_powerY_sampling_frequency
What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_currentZ_sampling_frequency
KernelVersion: 5.20
Contact: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Description:
Some devices have separate controls of sampling frequency for
individual channels. If multiple channels are enabled in a scan,
then the sampling_frequency of the scan may be computed from the
per channel sampling frequencies.
For many devices the sampling frequency isn't down to each sample taking
N microsecs and them running back to back, it is instead a function of
a periodic sampling start for samples that take the same time whatever
the sampling frequency. Also for simultaneous sampling ADCs it is never
channel dependent.
So I think if you want to avoid the confusion, make your device fall into
the description above and provide a per channel attribute rather
than shared_by_all.
Or keep it as things stand and have it halve when you double the channels.
>
> > + *val = clk_rate;
> > +
> > + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> > + }
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-08 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-05 15:17 [PATCH v2 0/9] iio: add support for the ad3552r AXI DAC IP Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] dt-bindings: iio: dac: ad3552r: add io-backend property Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 16:28 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-09-05 19:51 ` David Lechner
2024-09-08 12:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-09 11:39 ` Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-09 19:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-09 12:46 ` Conor Dooley
2024-09-09 14:03 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-09 16:06 ` Conor Dooley
2024-09-10 8:12 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-09 17:19 ` David Lechner
2024-09-09 17:38 ` David Lechner
2024-09-10 8:16 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-11 8:45 ` Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-11 19:28 ` Conor Dooley
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] iio: backend: extend features Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-08 12:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-09 11:58 ` Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] iio: backend adi-axi-dac: " Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-08 15:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-08 15:40 ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] iio: backend adi-axi-dac: add registering of child fdt node Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 19:19 ` David Lechner
2024-09-06 5:42 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-06 13:52 ` David Lechner
2024-09-06 7:08 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-08 12:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-09 7:53 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add ad3552r axi-dac compatible Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 16:28 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-09-05 21:08 ` David Lechner
2024-09-06 7:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-06 9:11 ` Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-06 9:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-06 11:53 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-06 12:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-06 13:52 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-06 14:04 ` David Lechner
2024-09-06 16:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-06 16:42 ` David Lechner
2024-09-06 16:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-06 16:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] iio: dac: ad3552r: changes to use FIELD_PREP Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 20:59 ` David Lechner
2024-09-08 15:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-08 15:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] iio: dac: ad3552r: extract common code (no changes in behavior intended) Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-08 15:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-08 15:53 ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] iio: dac: ad3552r: add axi platform driver Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 20:40 ` David Lechner
2024-09-08 15:49 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-09-09 9:00 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-08 16:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-08 16:28 ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-09-09 13:35 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] iio: ABI: add DAC sysfs synchronous_mode parameter Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 19:14 ` David Lechner
2024-09-08 12:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-05 19:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] iio: add support for the ad3552r AXI DAC IP David Lechner
2024-09-06 9:07 ` Conor Dooley
2024-09-06 9:44 ` Angelo Dureghello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240908164940.7c4ffb8a@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=adureghello@baylibre.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=olivier.moysan@foss.st.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox