Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the slab tree

Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-09T09:33:19Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 662 bytes --]

Hi Vlastimil,

On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 10:49:45 +0200 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> ... so it would have to be either slab tree from 20240905 (before it
> included the vfs commits), or vfs from 20240906 (before the commits on vfs
> side got different id's).

You need to remember that my time zone is UTC+1000 :-)

> I guess if you rolled back vfs side in -next, then it makes more sense to
> reset vfs, and if slab side, then slab.

The vfs-brauner tree is merged into linux-next earlyish in the morning.
the slab tree late in the afternoon. My preference is to rollback the
later tree is that works.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]