From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Joel Granados <j.granados@samsung.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] iommu: kconfig: Move IOMMU_IOPF into INTEL_IOMMU
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 10:37:34 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240915133734.GC869260@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240911074059.f3i22vso6g6payrj@joelS2.panther.com>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 09:40:59AM +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 09:20:19AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 03:17:14PM +0200, Joel Granados via B4 Relay wrote:
> > > @@ -51,7 +52,6 @@ config INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> > > depends on X86_64
> > > select MMU_NOTIFIER
> > > select IOMMU_SVA
> > > - select IOMMU_IOPF
> >
> > Does patch 1 still compile if INTEL_IOMMU_SVM=n?
> It does for me. With and without INTEL_IOMMU_SVM. Is there a config that
> is not compiling for you? You can send that you to me and I can give it
> a try, to see if I get the same issue.
Okay, it compiles, but it is broken right? This hunk just can't be
correct, SVM needs IOPF to work
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-15 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-04 13:17 [PATCH 0/6] iommu: Enable user space IOPFs in non-nested and non-svm cases Joel Granados via B4 Relay
2024-09-04 13:17 ` [PATCH 1/6] iommu/vt-d: Separate page request queue from SVM Joel Granados via B4 Relay
2024-09-05 3:18 ` Baolu Lu
2024-09-11 7:28 ` Joel Granados
2024-09-04 13:17 ` [PATCH 2/6] iommu/vt-d: Remove the pasid present check in prq_event_thread Joel Granados via B4 Relay
2024-09-04 13:17 ` [PATCH 3/6] iommu: kconfig: Move IOMMU_IOPF into INTEL_IOMMU Joel Granados via B4 Relay
2024-09-07 12:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-11 7:40 ` Joel Granados
2024-09-15 13:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-09-16 12:24 ` Joel Granados
2024-09-04 13:17 ` [PATCH 4/6] iommufd: Enable PRI when doing the iommufd_hwpt_alloc Joel Granados via B4 Relay
2024-09-04 13:17 ` [PATCH 5/6] iommu: init pasid array while doing domain_replace and iopf is active Joel Granados via B4 Relay
2024-09-05 3:30 ` Baolu Lu
2024-09-05 3:32 ` Baolu Lu
2024-09-11 9:55 ` Joel Granados
2024-09-12 4:17 ` Baolu Lu
2024-09-12 10:22 ` Joel Granados
2024-09-11 10:56 ` Joel Granados
2024-09-12 4:21 ` Baolu Lu
2024-09-12 8:25 ` Joel Granados
2024-09-12 11:22 ` Baolu Lu
2024-09-13 8:02 ` Joel Granados
2024-09-12 10:00 ` Joel Granados
2024-09-04 13:17 ` [PATCH 6/6] iommu/vt-d: drop pasid requirement for prq initialization Joel Granados via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240915133734.GC869260@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
--cc=j.granados@samsung.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox