From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Matthieu Buffet <matthieu@buffet.re>
Cc: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Konstantin Meskhidze" <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>,
"Ivanov Mikhail" <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/7] landlock: Add UDP bind+connect access control
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:39:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240920.choPhoa8ahp8@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240916122230.114800-4-matthieu@buffet.re>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 02:22:26PM +0200, Matthieu Buffet wrote:
> Add support for two more access rights:
>
> - LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_UDP, to gate the possibility to connect()
> an inet SOCK_DGRAM socket. This will be used by some client applications
> (those who want to avoid specifying a destination for each datagram in
> sendmsg), and for a few servers (those creating a socket per-client, who
> want to only receive traffic from each client on these sockets)
>
> - LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP, to gate the possibility to bind() an
> inet SOCK_DGRAM socket. This will be required for most server
> applications (to start listening for datagrams on a non-ephemeral
> port) and can be useful for some client applications (to set the
> source port of future datagrams)
>
> Also bump the ABI version from 5 to 6 so that userland can detect
> whether these rights are supported and actually use them.
>
Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/10
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Buffet <matthieu@buffet.re>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/landlock.h | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> security/landlock/limits.h | 2 +-
> security/landlock/net.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> security/landlock/syscalls.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> index 2c8dbc74b955..7f9aa1cd2912 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> @@ -113,12 +113,15 @@ struct landlock_net_port_attr {
> *
> * It should be noted that port 0 passed to :manpage:`bind(2)` will bind
> * to an available port from the ephemeral port range. This can be
> - * configured with the ``/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range`` sysctl
> - * (also used for IPv6).
> + * configured globally with the
> + * ``/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range`` sysctl (also used for
> + * IPv6), and on a per-socket basis using
> + * ``setsockopt(IP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE)``.
Interesting... setsockopt(IP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE) can always be set
independant of the sysctl, but fortunately it is only taken into account
if it fits into the sysctl range (see inet_sk_get_local_port_range),
which makes sense.
> *
> * A Landlock rule with port 0 and the ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP``
> - * right means that requesting to bind on port 0 is allowed and it will
> - * automatically translate to binding on the related port range.
> + * or ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP`` right means that requesting to
> + * bind on port 0 is allowed and it will automatically translate to
> + * binding on the related port range.
> */
> __u64 port;
> };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-20 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-16 12:22 [RFC PATCH v1 0/7] landlock: Add UDP access control support Matthieu Buffet
2024-09-16 12:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/7] samples/landlock: Fix port parsing in sandboxer Matthieu Buffet
2024-09-20 13:38 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-09-23 15:24 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-16 12:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/7] samples/landlock: Clarify option parsing behaviour Matthieu Buffet
2024-09-20 13:38 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-09-16 12:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/7] landlock: Add UDP bind+connect access control Matthieu Buffet
2024-09-20 13:39 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2024-09-16 12:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/7] landlock: Add UDP send+recv " Matthieu Buffet
2024-09-21 10:23 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-10-19 12:47 ` Matthieu Buffet
2024-10-21 9:57 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-09-16 12:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/7] samples/landlock: Add sandboxer UDP " Matthieu Buffet
2024-10-04 15:04 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-09-16 12:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 6/7] selftests/landlock: Adapt existing tests for UDP Matthieu Buffet
2024-09-16 12:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 7/7] selftests/landlock: Add UDP sendmsg/recvmsg tests Matthieu Buffet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240920.choPhoa8ahp8@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthieu@buffet.re \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox