From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BDA4125A9 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726785830; cv=none; b=Ep1hQY7VUAepn3GwQF9EEAZBCT94xGOl5dSumLFfoGnMeR8lthuGzMUDBgFHvuxQNsS+6r6FSdkpMpgPWAFRTuL0lyvD6K7QcWZXyHsOuXa3FJ+25it7Yc0/XsytrbMdnSKXThh65rOsp/kw8es/6oCf7lYCrIHrdt8bGeqOElQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726785830; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Fhu7YT+CCTUlhDgFevdRmHSSmqXS6RBEGTbuJJwSf0w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=c2astVvTg7Rkl4lPzY5GD/WLwYELIVggYrwXYkT94m1h+1jtjGNZULRgTWZ6f1xQYcGJZ8bA/YYVuYb0hFYZdBE5+71SSm/z16TNIb+nlYXvPwN4G+Mz/ijZ1mIGlgFIg56M9hxhgqxt2CT6t6ekK1kVsU0l50sXHFnHKvT/EL0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=CG1S2h1O; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="CG1S2h1O" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1726785829; x=1758321829; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Fhu7YT+CCTUlhDgFevdRmHSSmqXS6RBEGTbuJJwSf0w=; b=CG1S2h1OdvPNNzemARCr0zNSGHAqWxVXUTtKxNQ0xnrEtsNSusvU6Qkf EZe1NL439ChSy+V47bWiD94c8641RRk+0lXkN6q5jeP7R1NWvAJj2p9rt rDAEhljrX2q45EXxKL4l3WokNIK43t+gGjcHtg+zcDlOoR2Us3FtP7Gen /5NRMp37s/+g/tKRdW8P7KXt98xolJVdDu1yA+Oo6mHSIOuJcbOkbJtxR PxU/2a8+Usbj4AWBU0DL19/K9uQtkCWTfAkwb6cJI812w5nA8jiWBIjuy lGpxvLbjYwjuFRIkbiWzwSjR6j7JEUFA4HM1o0PY2dBSQfE22G18SQBOK A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: bUcnnnHJRgmgmS7qqF4Gbg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: mB+N9k0vTca/BRk/vo+kWQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11200"; a="48310044" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,243,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="48310044" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Sep 2024 15:43:48 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: pfgdMEkRRHWQFN7rXW35lA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: BMmpoMYiSsq7itvgF/dNkA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,243,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="70335641" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 53e96f405c61) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2024 15:43:47 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 53e96f405c61 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1srPsG-000DlX-2c; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:43:44 +0000 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:43:24 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq: Move cmdq_instruction init to declaration Message-ID: <202409200659.IVYRJ33l-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240918100620.103536-4-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240918100620.103536-4-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Hi AngeloGioacchino, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on clk/clk-next] [also build test WARNING on soc/for-next linus/master v6.11 next-20240919] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/AngeloGioacchino-Del-Regno/soc-mediatek-mtk-cmdq-Move-mask-build-and-append-to-function/20240918-180757 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git clk-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240918100620.103536-4-angelogioacchino.delregno%40collabora.com patch subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq: Move cmdq_instruction init to declaration config: parisc-randconfig-r123-20240920 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240920/202409200659.IVYRJ33l-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240920/202409200659.IVYRJ33l-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409200659.IVYRJ33l-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c:240:18: sparse: sparse: Initializer entry defined twice drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c:244:18: sparse: also defined here vim +240 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c 234 235 int cmdq_pkt_write_s(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u16 high_addr_reg_idx, 236 u16 addr_low, u16 src_reg_idx) 237 { 238 struct cmdq_instruction inst = { 239 .op = CMDQ_CODE_WRITE_S, > 240 .mask = 0, 241 .src_t = CMDQ_REG_TYPE, 242 .sop = high_addr_reg_idx, 243 .offset = addr_low, 244 .src_reg = src_reg_idx 245 }; 246 return cmdq_pkt_append_command(pkt, inst); 247 } 248 EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmdq_pkt_write_s); 249 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki