From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BE101863E for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 03:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726803380; cv=none; b=GCX5x0bFzmHj86rMl20wQD7mBANfPD9FeyNH+JlgKpcnR6opNlXdEml3VHAUcj+eKxQ7EZLJrkdI6qJcG0Rl3P9ehWhfVaRoJ6sr0YK1USzocIt1AjCKP873cKzK7ZbC//BnHO+3hb/OB0ptdxv3wxJ23dwcl6SNm29ZQJr7MEQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726803380; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sQOi+DJccYWuLL/d6MtyHFVyVTZ3RrxdRwdb6ZsSJCE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ShL6teSphelecAiMfqSCEuYzHaq9fBfPyKAKc6bGHDgNYSyRZW/4wxU9d2/nRnQMt5asEKIDkEPQmTi3e1+hp8iLEjQ8Ftf3cxELGz8a7P4YZx1rKfRdxDXU/XRWgcEVPfyD7TJM0cPNM94QI0NevZC2RSXTYQg4wpWKPNcsJro= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=XcWbGhrP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="XcWbGhrP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1726803379; x=1758339379; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=sQOi+DJccYWuLL/d6MtyHFVyVTZ3RrxdRwdb6ZsSJCE=; b=XcWbGhrP5eTHaCGtBmE5b71zx9Og6BEVcHOeyulvg37rPntiJbPdqXds B13tXtWRNQ0qmiFhe0aWPI9oK/Bcm+3VbcAgBwdTIfVvAaWi8v4adFVS5 C9xOJzwGJrxDtqCw10goWoP320scpCtqCoZ/vjNe9uoF2kgRjA46S2R/Q Yhehl/rVVp1ZDlcvWMjz5uk7RF7sExgr4bTJ23u6nVrB6eAL4uy5X2/eA 5cx4oOaPvkKe8wmywA6NHMFCDQgYb3XZE/cRnETJVM8Ea4IXEp4l5BaVN 7JZnXQunbNGaM7IsP3hLmCOl2ayO/TH1rUJytH/vhXN3L5Ezz86icmoIB w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: dudAhnu8RnGoJScdtzTxgg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: oTTBrfLDRjGsAzviE0nwzg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11200"; a="25670169" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,243,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="25670169" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Sep 2024 20:36:18 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vaQYfDo+SZ2GJtYwD36SRQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: zEFAcQb2RaeZ/zqTsoUVcg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,243,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="70284826" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 53e96f405c61) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2024 20:36:15 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 53e96f405c61 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1srURJ-000DvT-0J; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 03:36:13 +0000 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:35:34 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Gowthami Thiagarajan , will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, sgoutham@marvell.com, lcherian@marvell.com, gcherian@marvell.com, Gowthami Thiagarajan Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] perf/marvell: Marvell PEM performance monitor support Message-ID: <202409201101.hqshrCE7-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240919125117.3484572-1-gthiagarajan@marvell.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240919125117.3484572-1-gthiagarajan@marvell.com> Hi Gowthami, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on tip/smp/core] [also build test WARNING on soc/for-next linus/master v6.11 next-20240919] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Gowthami-Thiagarajan/perf-marvell-Marvell-PEM-performance-monitor-support/20240919-205406 base: tip/smp/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240919125117.3484572-1-gthiagarajan%40marvell.com patch subject: [PATCH v7] perf/marvell: Marvell PEM performance monitor support config: arm-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240920/202409201101.hqshrCE7-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240920/202409201101.hqshrCE7-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409201101.hqshrCE7-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/perf/marvell_pem_pmu.c: In function 'pem_perf_read_counter': drivers/perf/marvell_pem_pmu.c:232:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq_relaxed'; did you mean 'readl_relaxed'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 232 | return readq_relaxed(pmu->base + eventid_to_offset(eventid)); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ | readl_relaxed drivers/perf/marvell_pem_pmu.c: In function 'pem_perf_probe': >> drivers/perf/marvell_pem_pmu.c:353:78: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'resource_size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=] 353 | name = devm_kasprintf(pem_pmu->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "mrvl_pcie_rc_pmu_%llx", | ~~~^ | | | long long unsigned int | %x 354 | res->start); | ~~~~~~~~~~ | | | resource_size_t {aka unsigned int} vim +353 drivers/perf/marvell_pem_pmu.c 315 316 static int pem_perf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) 317 { 318 struct pem_pmu *pem_pmu; 319 struct resource *res; 320 void __iomem *base; 321 char *name; 322 int ret; 323 324 pem_pmu = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pem_pmu), GFP_KERNEL); 325 if (!pem_pmu) 326 return -ENOMEM; 327 328 pem_pmu->dev = &pdev->dev; 329 platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pem_pmu); 330 331 base = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0, &res); 332 if (IS_ERR(base)) 333 return PTR_ERR(base); 334 335 pem_pmu->base = base; 336 337 pem_pmu->pmu = (struct pmu) { 338 .module = THIS_MODULE, 339 .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE, 340 .task_ctx_nr = perf_invalid_context, 341 .attr_groups = pem_perf_attr_groups, 342 .event_init = pem_perf_event_init, 343 .add = pem_perf_event_add, 344 .del = pem_perf_event_del, 345 .start = pem_perf_event_start, 346 .stop = pem_perf_event_stop, 347 .read = pem_perf_event_update, 348 }; 349 350 /* Choose this cpu to collect perf data */ 351 pem_pmu->cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); 352 > 353 name = devm_kasprintf(pem_pmu->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "mrvl_pcie_rc_pmu_%llx", 354 res->start); 355 if (!name) 356 return -ENOMEM; 357 358 cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_MRVL_PEM_ONLINE, 359 &pem_pmu->node); 360 361 ret = perf_pmu_register(&pem_pmu->pmu, name, -1); 362 if (ret) 363 goto error; 364 365 return 0; 366 error: 367 cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_MRVL_PEM_ONLINE, 368 &pem_pmu->node); 369 return ret; 370 } 371 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki