From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E17131367; Sat, 21 Sep 2024 17:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726940943; cv=none; b=EVurtuPeiT+xaNTcLe3/xPhQWD8bg4ot+l1ca73lUf8Z/LNr3TIs8kVRqcCkDLaihWyr4yBSA5ClCeTtx9j7NR4dueY8Vn17U7LHRld9y4mWZ5BfACWrt046SZSsBCZcObJnAntaUh0K1bm0CafzDKWLS1XAoN//KW7w5j17wvM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726940943; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iD9bEdfUpajZR4FI7A07bRdvcrxIsFc3nwiOruFGQyM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=g3PJve72vphE/r902uOnDX6k73yDBgOGnKne4rpovSM7oNKu9RbCnlm05PyUYi2CeXSnW+6i94j9HHCdAya/XZLwGL7Q9JWtvdjipaL87BpwDkKm3NJukr7BfVEM8b+UurMgPos8aV/R95IgDOgUL38lR8zYnK5iYdwWgeW/Urk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=dsVZvZqY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="dsVZvZqY" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1726940942; x=1758476942; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=iD9bEdfUpajZR4FI7A07bRdvcrxIsFc3nwiOruFGQyM=; b=dsVZvZqYPz3DAV124XzwD13deAwuPkA8qRVIHTMvl//Q9clzSttvq6/i MleyXVjff6NDEZRnERI0K+YO/hs1PuC40J3yLZrX151r8X2/NaMbUyTa5 7IrJ32cfHExmH6rWSjJ/SEbfjbg02XK6NWePIdsxdGEJWr+vtOyUYmVIn cE2QbspUV3plirojRWIKhwVpd04KZaCd26nxyPvsYQJSJ/iNVnFCMmayq uDSasuUBMa/9QOjzvXuBvvrqljRPCQwmFi+5ltQwhnqeZ0jwl3uB74vbw poNTklF/T+bOT91lhj0pzzlM6kC+GPi4rJz3Am4lOM+Cii4dUJjtkzc/e g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: PpxnyZXMSKO5RryIvaxoTw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: oZEP3bMmS2232E4m5NoG9g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11202"; a="29656844" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,247,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="29656844" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Sep 2024 10:49:01 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: uoKcFNkPQm2g9f4YoKepsQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: l+qQnOaIQcixZAtO72XkeQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,247,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="75184520" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 53e96f405c61) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Sep 2024 10:48:59 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 53e96f405c61 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ss4E4-000Fed-2h; Sat, 21 Sep 2024 17:48:56 +0000 Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 01:48:53 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: "Luke D. Jones" , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hdegoede@redhat.com, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, corentin.chary@gmail.com, "Luke D. Jones" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] platform/x86: asus-armoury: move existing tunings to asus-armoury module Message-ID: <202409220126.kUWmewio-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240918094250.82430-2-luke@ljones.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240918094250.82430-2-luke@ljones.dev> Hi Luke, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on next-20240918] [also build test ERROR on v6.11] [cannot apply to linus/master v6.11 v6.11-rc7 v6.11-rc6] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Luke-D-Jones/platform-x86-asus-armoury-move-existing-tunings-to-asus-armoury-module/20240918-174540 base: next-20240918 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240918094250.82430-2-luke%40ljones.dev patch subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] platform/x86: asus-armoury: move existing tunings to asus-armoury module config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240922/202409220126.kUWmewio-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240922/202409220126.kUWmewio-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409220126.kUWmewio-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): >> drivers/platform/x86/asus-armoury.c:161: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'attr' not described in 'attr_int_store' >> drivers/platform/x86/asus-armoury.c:161: warning: Excess function parameter 'kobj_attribute' description in 'attr_int_store' -- >> ERROR: modpost: module hid-asus uses symbol asus_wmi_evaluate_method from namespace ASUS_WMI, but does not import it. -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki