From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D45117BB33 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727173040; cv=none; b=l6bGlqIJMy0WQ1O1YPoaAw517Yl9kfM44Pmz/2AZ+6KuXMpXkIZIVuV8+fgKksFAI/4GymBFbpE+mxvRKK12ip+dceNBWX2P7k6159xR7Mxg1/JXJKXhsUhKwa+bYWNDrNvt012Kdg420HRTnlyPVqoG5Ex961Ed2ZHqn5eLSWQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727173040; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Qe62jGVjwe44BJK7aPiTKLXdPoBwZHG5622MYXbefrg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=R5xbjNKLqY3ejnzWX1AbfYBRo36eXD/S8uAwjDqYib4/Szlb65n0daoYiMcyerJaQL5Vsw/Ra02Mira60jVjlnphwiUmz+l5a6fuXkirlSSF9Ib9SUDVz2bRcxYfxDcxIm0PulqzA8y5dor8hX0xIQvYUGuWedBH5xMGtyKaMFo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BC8DA7; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 03:17:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e116581.blr.arm.com (e116581.arm.com [10.162.43.15]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 750913F528; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 03:17:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Dev Jain To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, cl@gentwo.org, vbabka@suse.cz, mhocko@suse.com, apopple@nvidia.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, will@kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, mark.rutland@arm.com, hughd@google.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, peterx@redhat.com, ioworker0@gmail.com, jglisse@google.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, ziy@nvidia.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Dev Jain Subject: [PATCH v5 0/2] Do not shatter hugezeropage on wp-fault Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:46:52 +0530 Message-Id: <20240924101654.1777697-1-dev.jain@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit It was observed at [1] and [2] that the current kernel behaviour of shattering a hugezeropage is inconsistent and suboptimal. For a VMA with a THP allowable order, when we write-fault on it, the kernel installs a PMD-mapped THP. On the other hand, if we first get a read fault, we get a PMD pointing to the hugezeropage; subsequent write will trigger a write-protection fault, shattering the hugezeropage into one writable page, and all the other PTEs write-protected. The conclusion being, as compared to the case of a single write-fault, applications have to suffer 512 extra page faults if they were to use the VMA as such, plus we get the overhead of khugepaged trying to replace that area with a THP anyway. Instead, replace the hugezeropage with a THP on wp-fault. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/3743d7e1-0b79-4eaf-82d5-d1ca29fe347d@arm.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1cfae0c0-96a2-4308-9c62-f7a640520242@arm.com/ The patchset has been rebased on the mm-unstable branch. v4->v5: - Directly return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK in case of !folio v3->v4: - Renames: pmd_thp_fault_alloc -> vma_alloc_anon_folio_pmd, map_pmd_thp -> map_anon_folio_pmd - Instead of passing around, compute haddr at various places, similar with gfp flags - Pass haddr to update_mmu_cache_pmd() instead of unaligned address - Do not pass vmf to map_anon_folio_pmd - Do declarations in reverse xmas tree order - Drop a new line which was introduced accidentally - Call __pmd_thp_fault_success_stats from map_anon_folio_pmd - Correctly return NULL from vma_alloc_anon_folio_pmd - Initialize pgtable to NULL in __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page, to prevent freeing pgtable when not even allocated - Drop if conditions from map_anon_folio_pmd, let the caller handle that v2->v3: - Drop foliop and order parameters, prefix the thp functions with pmd_ - First allocate THP, then pgtable, not vice-versa - Move pgtable_trans_huge_deposit() from map_pmd_thp() to caller - Drop exposing functions in include/linux/huge_mm.h - Open code do_huge_zero_wp_pmd_locked() - Release folio in case of pmd change after taking the lock, or check_stable_address_space() returning VM_FAULT_SIGBUS - Drop uffd-wp preservation. Looking at page_table_check_pmd_flags(), preserving uffd-wp on a writable entry is invalid. Looking at mfill_atomic(), uffd_copy() is a null operation when pmd is marked uffd-wp. v1->v2: - Wrap do_huge_zero_wp_pmd_locked() around lock and unlock - Call thp_fault_alloc() before do_huge_zero_wp_pmd_locked() to avoid - calling sleeping function from spinlock context Dev Jain (2): mm: Abstract THP allocation mm: Allocate THP on hugezeropage wp-fault mm/huge_memory.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) -- 2.30.2