[PATCH 7/7] softirq: use bit waits instead of var waits.

[NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>]

The waiting in softirq.c is always waiting for a bit to be cleared.
This makes the bit wait functions seem more suitable.
By switching over we can rid of all explicit barriers.  We also use
wait_on_bit_lock() to avoid an explicit loop.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
 kernel/softirq.c | 14 ++++----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index d082e7840f88..b756d6b3fd09 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -748,10 +748,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__tasklet_hi_schedule);
 
 static bool tasklet_clear_sched(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 {
-	if (test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
-		wake_up_var(&t->state);
+	if (test_and_clear_wake_up_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state))
 		return true;
-	}
 
 	WARN_ONCE(1, "tasklet SCHED state not set: %s %pS\n",
 		  t->use_callback ? "callback" : "func",
@@ -871,8 +869,7 @@ void tasklet_kill(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 	if (in_interrupt())
 		pr_notice("Attempt to kill tasklet from interrupt\n");
 
-	while (test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state))
-		wait_var_event(&t->state, !test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state));
+	wait_on_bit_lock(&t->state, TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 
 	tasklet_unlock_wait(t);
 	tasklet_clear_sched(t);
@@ -882,16 +879,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(tasklet_kill);
 #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
 void tasklet_unlock(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 {
-	smp_mb__before_atomic();
-	clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &t->state);
-	smp_mb__after_atomic();
-	wake_up_var(&t->state);
+	clear_and_wake_up_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &t->state);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tasklet_unlock);
 
 void tasklet_unlock_wait(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 {
-	wait_var_event(&t->state, !test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &t->state));
+	wait_on_bit(&t->state, TASKLET_STATE_RUN, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tasklet_unlock_wait);
 #endif
-- 
2.46.0