public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched_ext: Allow only user DSQs for scx_bpf_consume(), scx_bpf_dsq_nr_queued() and bpf_iter_scx_dsq_new()
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 12:09:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240925170956.GC26346@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240925000622.1972325-3-tj@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1770 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 02:06:04PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:

Hi Tejun,

> SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL is special in that it can't be used as a priority queue and
> is consumed implicitly, but all BPF DSQ related kfuncs could be used on it.
> SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL will be split per-node for scalability and those operations
> won't make sense anymore. Disallow SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL on scx_bpf_consume(),
> scx_bpf_dsq_nr_queued() and bpf_iter_scx_dsq_new(). This means that
> SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL can only be used as a dispatch target from BPF schedulers.

This API impedance where you can dispatch but not consume feels unnatural, and
a bit leaky. I understand why we don't want to allow BPF to consume it -- we're
already doing it for the user as part of (and before) the dispatch loop. That's
also one-off logic that's separate from the normal interface for DSQs though,
and because of that, SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL imposes a cognitive overhead that IMO
arguably outweighs the convenience it provides.

I'm still of the opinion that we should just hide SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL from the user
altogether. It makes sense why we'd need it as a backup DSQ for when we're e.g.
unloading the scheduler, but as a building block that's provided by the kernel
to the user, I'm not sure. In a realistic production scenario where you're
doing something like running a scheduler that's latency sensitive and cares
about deadlines, I'm not sure it would be viable or ever the optimal decision
to throw the task in a global DSQ and tolerate it being consumed before other
higher-priority tasks that were enqueued in normal DSQs. Or at the very least,
I could see users being surprised by the semantics, and having instead expected
it to function as just a built-in / pre-created DSQ that functions normally
otherwise.

Thanks,
David

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-25 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-25  0:06 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.12-fixes] sched_ext: Split %SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL per-node Tejun Heo
2024-09-25  0:06 ` [PATCH 1/5] scx_flatcg: Use a user DSQ for fallback instead of SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL Tejun Heo
2024-09-25 16:45   ` David Vernet
2024-09-25  0:06 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched_ext: Allow only user DSQs for scx_bpf_consume(), scx_bpf_dsq_nr_queued() and bpf_iter_scx_dsq_new() Tejun Heo
2024-09-25 17:09   ` David Vernet [this message]
2024-09-25 21:04     ` Tejun Heo
2024-09-26 21:36       ` David Vernet
2024-09-25  0:06 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched_ext: Relocate find_user_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-09-26 21:46   ` David Vernet
2024-09-25  0:06 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched_ext: Split the global DSQ per NUMA node Tejun Heo
2024-09-26 21:56   ` David Vernet
2024-09-25  0:06 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched_ext: Use shorter slice while bypassing Tejun Heo
2024-09-26 22:07   ` David Vernet
2024-09-26 22:55     ` Tejun Heo
2024-09-26 23:00 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.12-fixes] sched_ext: Split %SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL per-node Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240925170956.GC26346@maniforge \
    --to=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sched-ext@meta.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox