From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Revert SLOT_ZAP_ALL quirk
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 17:16:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240927001635.501418-1-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
Revert the entire KVM_X86_QUIRK_SLOT_ZAP_ALL series, as the code is buggy
for shadow MMUs, and I'm not convinced a quirk is actually the right way
forward. I'm not totally opposed to it (obviously, given that I suggested
it at one point), but I would prefer to give ourselves ample time to sort
out exactly how we want to move forward, i.e. not rush something in to
unhose v6.12.
Sean Christopherson (4):
Revert "KVM: selftests: Test memslot move in memslot_perf_test with
quirk disabled"
Revert "KVM: selftests: Allow slot modification stress test with quirk
disabled"
Revert "KVM: selftests: Test slot move/delete with slot zap quirk
enabled/disabled"
Revert "KVM: x86/mmu: Introduce a quirk to control memslot zap
behavior"
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 8 -----
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +-
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 -
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 34 +------------------
.../kvm/memslot_modification_stress_test.c | 19 ++---------
.../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 12 +------
.../selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c | 29 +++++-----------
7 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
base-commit: 3f8df6285271d9d8f17d733433e5213a63b83a0b
--
2.46.1.824.gd892dcdcdd-goog
next reply other threads:[~2024-09-27 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-27 0:16 Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-09-27 0:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] Revert "KVM: selftests: Test memslot move in memslot_perf_test with quirk disabled" Sean Christopherson
2024-09-27 0:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] Revert "KVM: selftests: Allow slot modification stress test " Sean Christopherson
2024-09-27 0:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] Revert "KVM: selftests: Test slot move/delete with slot zap quirk enabled/disabled" Sean Christopherson
2024-09-27 0:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] Revert "KVM: x86/mmu: Introduce a quirk to control memslot zap behavior" Sean Christopherson
2024-09-27 15:43 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Revert SLOT_ZAP_ALL quirk Paolo Bonzini
2024-09-27 16:40 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240927001635.501418-1-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox