* Re: [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review
2024-09-27 12:23 [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-09-27 15:51 ` Allen
2024-09-27 17:12 ` Peter Schneider
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Allen @ 2024-09-27 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, broonie
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.12 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:17:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems.
No errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review
2024-09-27 12:23 [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-09-27 15:51 ` Allen
@ 2024-09-27 17:12 ` Peter Schneider
2024-09-27 18:36 ` Jon Hunter
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2024-09-27 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
Am 27.09.2024 um 14:23 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.12 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg
oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review
2024-09-27 12:23 [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-09-27 15:51 ` Allen
2024-09-27 17:12 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2024-09-27 18:36 ` Jon Hunter
2024-09-27 19:40 ` Florian Fainelli
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-09-27 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 14:23:02 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.12 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:17:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.10:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.10.12-rc1-g8b49a95a8604
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review
2024-09-27 12:23 [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-27 18:36 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-09-27 19:40 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-09-28 12:44 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-09-27 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 9/27/24 05:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.12 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:17:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review
2024-09-27 12:23 [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-27 19:40 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-09-28 12:44 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-09-28 17:14 ` Shuah Khan
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-09-28 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Fri, 27 Sept 2024 at 17:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.12 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:17:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.10.12-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 8b49a95a86047813f754fc406afce23ef0458caf
* git describe: v6.10.10-178-g8b49a95a8604
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.10.y/build/v6.10.10-178-g8b49a95a8604
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.10.10-122-ge9fde6b546b5)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.10.10-122-ge9fde6b546b5)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.10.10-122-ge9fde6b546b5)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.10.10-122-ge9fde6b546b5)
## Test result summary
total: 231568, pass: 203991, fail: 2025, skip: 25083, xfail: 469
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 131 total, 129 passed, 2 failed
* arm64: 43 total, 43 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 28 total, 26 passed, 2 failed
* mips: 26 total, 25 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 3 passed, 1 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 35 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 11 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 14 total, 13 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 7 total, 6 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 35 total, 34 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-rust
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-ma[
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review
2024-09-27 12:23 [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-28 12:44 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-09-28 17:14 ` Shuah Khan
2024-09-29 8:28 ` Ron Economos
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-09-28 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 9/27/24 06:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.12 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:17:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review
2024-09-27 12:23 [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-28 17:14 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-09-29 8:28 ` Ron Economos
2024-09-29 10:55 ` Kexy Biscuit
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-09-29 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 9/27/24 5:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.12 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:17:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review
2024-09-27 12:23 [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-29 8:28 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-09-29 10:55 ` Kexy Biscuit
2024-09-29 11:22 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Kexy Biscuit @ 2024-09-29 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 9/27/2024 8:23 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.12 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:17:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Building passed on amd64, arm64, loongarch64, ppc64el, and riscv64.
Smoke testing passed on 9 amd64 and 1 arm64 test systems.
Tested-by: Kexy Biscuit <kexybiscuit@aosc.io>
https://github.com/AOSC-Dev/aosc-os-abbs/pull/8113
--
Best Regards,
Kexy Biscuit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review
2024-09-27 12:23 [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-29 10:55 ` Kexy Biscuit
@ 2024-09-29 11:22 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-09-30 8:46 ` Pavel Machek
2024-10-01 14:24 ` Guenter Roeck
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum @ 2024-09-29 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
---- On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 17:23:02 +0500 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote ---
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.12 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:17:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Hi,
Please find the KernelCI report below :-
OVERVIEW
Builds: 26 passed, 0 failed
Boot tests: 510 passed, 0 failed
CI systems: maestro
REVISION
Commit
name: v6.10.10-178-g8b49a95a8604
hash: 8b49a95a86047813f754fc406afce23ef0458caf
Checked out from
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
BUILDS
No new build failures found
BOOT TESTS
No new boot failures found
See complete and up-to-date report at:
https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/revision/revision?orgId=1&var-datasource=production&var-git_commit_hash=8b49a95a86047813f754fc406afce23ef0458caf&var-patchset_hash=&var-origin=maestro&var-build_architecture=All&var-build_config_name=All&var-test_path=
Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Thanks,
KernelCI team
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review
2024-09-27 12:23 [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-29 11:22 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
@ 2024-09-30 8:46 ` Pavel Machek
2024-10-01 14:24 ` Guenter Roeck
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-09-30 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 710 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.12 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.10.y
6.6 passes our testing, too:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.6.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
BR,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review
2024-09-27 12:23 [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-30 8:46 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-10-01 14:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-10-01 14:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
10 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2024-10-01 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, Bibo Mao, Huacai Chen
On 9/27/24 05:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.12 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:17:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
Most loongarch builds are broken.
Building loongarch:defconfig ... failed
--------------
Error log:
arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c: In function 'kvm_set_one_reg':
arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c:575:35: error: 'struct kvm_vcpu_arch' has no member named 'st'
575 | vcpu->arch.st.guest_addr = 0;
This is due to commit 05969a694471 ("LoongArch: KVM: Invalidate guest steal time address
on vCPU reset"). Note that this commit is not tagged as bug fix. I am copying the author.
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.10 00/58] 6.10.12-rc1 review
2024-10-01 14:24 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2024-10-01 14:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-10-01 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, Bibo Mao, Huacai Chen
On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 07:24:27AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 9/27/24 05:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.12 release.
> > There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:17:00 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.12-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
>
> Most loongarch builds are broken.
>
> Building loongarch:defconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c: In function 'kvm_set_one_reg':
> arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c:575:35: error: 'struct kvm_vcpu_arch' has no member named 'st'
> 575 | vcpu->arch.st.guest_addr = 0;
>
> This is due to commit 05969a694471 ("LoongArch: KVM: Invalidate guest steal time address
> on vCPU reset"). Note that this commit is not tagged as bug fix. I am copying the author.
Already reverted in my tree, thanks!
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread