public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, kernel-team@meta.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched/core: Make select_task_rq() take the pointer to wake_flags instead of value
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 19:38:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240928003840.GA2717@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240927234838.152112-2-tj@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 577 bytes --]

On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 01:46:11PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> This will be used to allow select_task_rq() to indicate whether
> ->select_task_rq() was called by modifying *wake_flags.
> 
> This makes try_to_wake_up() call all functions that take wake_flags with
> WF_TTWU set. Previously, only select_task_rq() was. Using the same flags is
> more consistent, and, as the flag is only tested by ->select_task_rq()
> implementations, it doesn't cause any behavior differences.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-28  0:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-27 23:46 [PATCHSET sched/urgent, sched_ext/for-6.12-fixes] sched/core, sched_ext: Add ENQUEUE_RQ_SELECTED to fix ->select_task_rq() skip detection in sched_ext schedulers Tejun Heo
2024-09-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/core: Make select_task_rq() take the pointer to wake_flags instead of value Tejun Heo
2024-09-28  0:38   ` David Vernet [this message]
2024-09-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched/core: Add ENQUEUE_RQ_SELECTED to indicate whether ->select_task_rq() was called Tejun Heo
2024-09-28  0:38   ` David Vernet
2024-10-01 20:12   ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-04 20:14     ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-05  9:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-07 16:44         ` Tejun Heo
2024-09-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched_ext, scx_qmap: Add and use SCX_ENQ_CPU_SELECTED Tejun Heo
2024-09-28  0:39   ` David Vernet
2024-09-28 13:21   ` Andrea Righi
2024-09-28 16:52     ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-07 20:20 ` [PATCHSET sched/urgent, sched_ext/for-6.12-fixes] sched/core, sched_ext: Add ENQUEUE_RQ_SELECTED to fix ->select_task_rq() skip detection in sched_ext schedulers Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240928003840.GA2717@maniforge \
    --to=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sched-ext@meta.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox