From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, vasant.hegde@amd.com,
kevin.tian@intel.com, jon.grimm@amd.com, santosh.shukla@amd.com,
pandoh@google.com, kumaranand@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] iommu/amd: Introduce helper function to update 256-bit DTE
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 15:54:12 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241003185412.GD1365916@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc5b7217-49b5-4ca0-b4f7-0eab5000a2e4@amd.com>
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 11:15:53PM +0700, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> On 9/27/2024 2:46 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 05:18:01PM +0000, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> >
> > ....
> >
> > > + if (!(ptr->data[0] & DTE_FLAG_V)) {
> > > + /* Existing DTE is not valid. */
> > > + write_upper(ptr, new);
> > > + write_lower(ptr, new);
> > > + iommu_flush_sync_dte(iommu, dev_data->devid);
> > > + } else if (!(new->data[0] & DTE_FLAG_V)) {
> > > + /* Existing DTE is valid. New DTE is not valid. */
> > > + write_lower(ptr, new);
> > > + write_upper(ptr, new);
> > > + iommu_flush_sync_dte(iommu, dev_data->devid);
> > > + } else {
> > > + /* Existing & new DTEs are valid. */
> > > + if (!FIELD_GET(DTE_FLAG_GV, ptr->data[0])) {
> > > + /* Existing DTE has no guest page table. */
> > > + write_upper(ptr, new);
> > > + write_lower(ptr, new);
> > > + iommu_flush_sync_dte(iommu, dev_data->devid);
> > > + } else if (!FIELD_GET(DTE_FLAG_GV, new->data[0])) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Existing DTE has guest page table,
> > > + * new DTE has no guest page table,
> > > + */
> > > + write_lower(ptr, new);
> > > + write_upper(ptr, new);
> > > + iommu_flush_sync_dte(iommu, dev_data->devid);
> > > + } else {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Existing DTE has guest page table,
> > > + * new DTE has guest page table.
> > > + */
> > > + struct dev_table_entry clear = {};
> > > +
> > > + /* First disable DTE */
> > > + write_lower(ptr, &clear);
> > > + iommu_flush_sync_dte(iommu, dev_data->devid);
> > > +
> > > + /* Then update DTE */
> > > + write_upper(ptr, new);
> > > + write_lower(ptr, new);
> > > + iommu_flush_sync_dte(iommu, dev_data->devid);
> > > + }
> >
> > There is one branch missing where GV is valid in both and the [1]
> > doesn't change. Ie atomic replace of a GCR3 table.
>
> Not sure if I follow this.
Something like:
if (FIELD_GET(DTE_FLAG_GV, ptr->data[0]) &&
FIELD_GET(DTE_FLAG_GV, new->data[0]) &&
(ptr->data[2] & DTE_INTR_MASK) == (new->data[2] & DTE_INTR_MASK)) {
/* GCR3 table has changed, but the same number of levels, no need to disable DTE */
write_lower(ptr, new);
iommu_flush_sync_dte(iommu, dev_data->devid);
}
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-16 17:17 [PATCH v4 0/6] iommu/amd: Use 128-bit cmpxchg operation to update DTE Suravee Suthikulpanit
2024-09-16 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] iommu/amd: Disable AMD IOMMU if CMPXCHG16B feature is not supported Suravee Suthikulpanit
2024-09-16 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] iommu/amd: Introduce helper function to update 256-bit DTE Suravee Suthikulpanit
2024-09-26 19:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-03 16:15 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2024-10-03 18:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-09-16 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] iommu/amd: Modify set_dte_entry() to use 256-bit DTE helpers Suravee Suthikulpanit
2024-09-26 19:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-03 16:16 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2024-10-03 18:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-16 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] iommu/amd: Introduce helper function get_dte256() Suravee Suthikulpanit
2024-09-26 19:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-16 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] iommu/amd: Modify clear_dte_entry() to avoid in-place update Suravee Suthikulpanit
2024-09-26 19:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-03 16:15 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2024-09-16 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] iommu/amd: Lock DTE before updating the entry with WRITE_ONCE() Suravee Suthikulpanit
2024-09-26 19:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-23 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] iommu/amd: Use 128-bit cmpxchg operation to update DTE Suthikulpanit, Suravee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241003185412.GD1365916@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kumaranand@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pandoh@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox