From: Sam Edwards <cfsworks@gmail.com>
To: "Florian Fainelli" <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sam Edwards <CFSworks@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: fix crossbar port bitwidth logic
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 14:23:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241003212301.1339647-1-CFSworks@gmail.com> (raw)
The SF2 crossbar register is a packed bitfield, giving the index of the
external port selected for each of the internal ports. On BCM4908 (the
only currently-supported switch family with a crossbar), there are 2
internal ports and 3 external ports, so there are 2 bits per internal
port.
The driver currently conflates the "bits per port" and "number of ports"
concepts, lumping both into the `num_crossbar_int_ports` field. Since it
is currently only possible for either of these counts to have a value of
2, there is no behavioral error resulting from this situation for now.
Make the code more readable (and support the future possibility of
larger crossbars) by adding a `num_crossbar_ext_bits` field to represent
the "bits per port" count and relying on this where appropriate instead.
Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c | 9 ++++++---
drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
index 0e663ec0c12a..3ae794a30ace 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
@@ -513,12 +513,12 @@ static void bcm_sf2_crossbar_setup(struct bcm_sf2_priv *priv)
u32 reg;
int i;
- mask = BIT(priv->num_crossbar_int_ports) - 1;
+ mask = BIT(priv->num_crossbar_ext_bits) - 1;
reg = reg_readl(priv, REG_CROSSBAR);
switch (priv->type) {
case BCM4908_DEVICE_ID:
- shift = CROSSBAR_BCM4908_INT_P7 * priv->num_crossbar_int_ports;
+ shift = CROSSBAR_BCM4908_INT_P7 * priv->num_crossbar_ext_bits;
reg &= ~(mask << shift);
if (0) /* FIXME */
reg |= CROSSBAR_BCM4908_EXT_SERDES << shift;
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ static void bcm_sf2_crossbar_setup(struct bcm_sf2_priv *priv)
reg = reg_readl(priv, REG_CROSSBAR);
for (i = 0; i < priv->num_crossbar_int_ports; i++) {
- shift = i * priv->num_crossbar_int_ports;
+ shift = i * priv->num_crossbar_ext_bits;
dev_dbg(dev, "crossbar int port #%d - ext port #%d\n", i,
(reg >> shift) & mask);
@@ -1260,6 +1260,7 @@ struct bcm_sf2_of_data {
unsigned int core_reg_align;
unsigned int num_cfp_rules;
unsigned int num_crossbar_int_ports;
+ unsigned int num_crossbar_ext_bits;
};
static const u16 bcm_sf2_4908_reg_offsets[] = {
@@ -1288,6 +1289,7 @@ static const struct bcm_sf2_of_data bcm_sf2_4908_data = {
.reg_offsets = bcm_sf2_4908_reg_offsets,
.num_cfp_rules = 256,
.num_crossbar_int_ports = 2,
+ .num_crossbar_ext_bits = 2,
};
/* Register offsets for the SWITCH_REG_* block */
@@ -1399,6 +1401,7 @@ static int bcm_sf2_sw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
priv->core_reg_align = data->core_reg_align;
priv->num_cfp_rules = data->num_cfp_rules;
priv->num_crossbar_int_ports = data->num_crossbar_int_ports;
+ priv->num_crossbar_ext_bits = data->num_crossbar_ext_bits;
priv->rcdev = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(&pdev->dev,
"switch");
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.h b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.h
index f95f4880b69e..4fda075a3449 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.h
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.h
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ struct bcm_sf2_priv {
unsigned int core_reg_align;
unsigned int num_cfp_rules;
unsigned int num_crossbar_int_ports;
+ unsigned int num_crossbar_ext_bits;
/* spinlock protecting access to the indirect registers */
spinlock_t indir_lock;
--
2.44.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-03 21:23 Sam Edwards [this message]
2024-10-04 16:09 ` [PATCH] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: fix crossbar port bitwidth logic Florian Fainelli
2024-10-04 23:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241003212301.1339647-1-CFSworks@gmail.com \
--to=cfsworks@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox