public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com>
To: andrew@lunn.ch
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: Fix conditional handling of Wake-on-Lan configuration in dsa_user_set_wol
Date: Sun,  6 Oct 2024 00:12:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241005184235.22421-1-pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8555d3b6-8154-4a79-9828-352641ca0a58@lunn.ch>

In the original code, we initialize ret = -EOPNOTSUPP and then call 
phylink_ethtool_set_wol(). If DSA supports WOL, we call set_wol(). 
However, we aren’t checking if phylink_ethtool_set_wol() succeeds, 
so I assumed both functions should be called, and if either fails,
we return -EOPNOTSUPP.


static int dsa_user_set_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *w)
{
	struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_user_to_port(dev);
	struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
	int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;

	phylink_ethtool_set_wol(dp->pl, w);

	if (ds->ops->set_wol)
		ret = ds->ops->set_wol(ds, dp->index, w);

	return ret;
}

From your response, it seems either of the two function can handle setting 
WOL, if so shouldn't we check the return value of phylink_ethtool_set_wol() 
to ensure it succeeds?

Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-05 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-04 22:02 [PATCH] net: dsa: Fix conditional handling of Wake-on-Lan configuration in dsa_user_set_wol Mohammed Anees
2024-10-05 16:49 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-10-05 18:42   ` Mohammed Anees [this message]
2024-10-05 21:00     ` Andrew Lunn
2024-10-06 16:10       ` Mohammed Anees
2024-10-06 19:57         ` Andrew Lunn
2024-10-06 22:41           ` Mohammed Anees
2024-10-07  8:56           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-07 22:22             ` Mohammed Anees
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-07 22:22 [PATCH v2] " Vladimir Oltean
2024-10-07 22:43 ` [PATCH] " Mohammed Anees

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241005184235.22421-1-pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com \
    --to=pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox