public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyrone Wu <wudevelops@gmail.com>
To: olsajiri@gmail.com, laoar.shao@gmail.com, wudevelops@gmail.com
Cc: andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	haoluo@google.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kernel-patches-bot@fb.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, mykolal@fb.com, sdf@fomichev.me,
	shuah@kernel.org, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf v6 1/2] bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info
Date: Mon,  7 Oct 2024 18:29:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241007182933.8841-1-wudevelops@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZwOWs_XrBtlTGE24@krava>

From: tyrone-wu <wudevelops@gmail.com>

Previously when retrieving `bpf_link_info.perf_event` for
kprobe/uprobe/tracepoint, the `name_len` field was not populated by the
kernel, leaving it to reflect the value initially set by the user. This
behavior was inconsistent with how other input/output string buffer
fields function (e.g. `raw_tracepoint.tp_name_len`).

This patch fills `name_len` with the actual size of the string name.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABVU1kXwQXhqQGe0RTrr7eegtM6SVW_KayZBy16-yb0Snztmtg@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 1b715e1b0ec5 ("bpf: Support ->fill_link_info for perf_event")
Signed-off-by: Tyrone Wu <wudevelops@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
V5 -> V6:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZwOWs_XrBtlTGE24@krava/
- Use simpler buf check while keeping V4
- Fix netdev/checkpatch warning for 80 cols exceeded
- Fix Signed-off-by to use real name instead of git username

V4 -> V5:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CALOAHbC5xm7Cbfhau3z5X2PqUhiHECNWAPtJCWiOVqTKmdZp-Q@mail.gmail.com/
- Check that buf is not NULL before retrieving/using its length

V3 -> V4:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Zv_PP6Gs5cq3W2Ey@krava/
- Split patch into separate kernel and selftest change

V2 -> V3:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Zv7sISV0yEyGlEM3@krava/
- Use clearer variable name for user set/inputted name len (name_len -> input_len)
- Change (name_len -> input_len) type from size_t to u32 since it's only received and used as u32

V1 -> V2:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Zv0wl-S13WJnIkb_@krava/
- Use user set *ulen in bpf_copy_to_user before overwriting *ulen

 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index a8f1808a1ca5..b5a7e428ac16 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3565,27 +3565,33 @@ static void bpf_perf_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
 }
 
 static int bpf_perf_link_fill_common(const struct perf_event *event,
-				     char __user *uname, u32 ulen,
+				     char __user *uname, u32 *ulen,
 				     u64 *probe_offset, u64 *probe_addr,
 				     u32 *fd_type, unsigned long *missed)
 {
 	const char *buf;
-	u32 prog_id;
+	u32 prog_id, input_len;
 	size_t len;
 	int err;
 
-	if (!ulen ^ !uname)
+	if (!(*ulen) ^ !uname)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	err = bpf_get_perf_event_info(event, &prog_id, fd_type, &buf,
 				      probe_offset, probe_addr, missed);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
+
+	if (buf) {
+		input_len = *ulen;
+		len = strlen(buf);
+		*ulen = len + 1;
+	}
 	if (!uname)
 		return 0;
+
 	if (buf) {
-		len = strlen(buf);
-		err = bpf_copy_to_user(uname, buf, ulen, len);
+		err = bpf_copy_to_user(uname, buf, input_len, len);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 	} else {
@@ -3609,7 +3615,7 @@ static int bpf_perf_link_fill_kprobe(const struct perf_event *event,
 
 	uname = u64_to_user_ptr(info->perf_event.kprobe.func_name);
 	ulen = info->perf_event.kprobe.name_len;
-	err = bpf_perf_link_fill_common(event, uname, ulen, &offset, &addr,
+	err = bpf_perf_link_fill_common(event, uname, &ulen, &offset, &addr,
 					&type, &missed);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
@@ -3617,7 +3623,7 @@ static int bpf_perf_link_fill_kprobe(const struct perf_event *event,
 		info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_KRETPROBE;
 	else
 		info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE;
-
+	info->perf_event.kprobe.name_len = ulen;
 	info->perf_event.kprobe.offset = offset;
 	info->perf_event.kprobe.missed = missed;
 	if (!kallsyms_show_value(current_cred()))
@@ -3639,7 +3645,7 @@ static int bpf_perf_link_fill_uprobe(const struct perf_event *event,
 
 	uname = u64_to_user_ptr(info->perf_event.uprobe.file_name);
 	ulen = info->perf_event.uprobe.name_len;
-	err = bpf_perf_link_fill_common(event, uname, ulen, &offset, &addr,
+	err = bpf_perf_link_fill_common(event, uname, &ulen, &offset, &addr,
 					&type, NULL);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
@@ -3648,6 +3654,7 @@ static int bpf_perf_link_fill_uprobe(const struct perf_event *event,
 		info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_URETPROBE;
 	else
 		info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_UPROBE;
+	info->perf_event.uprobe.name_len = ulen;
 	info->perf_event.uprobe.offset = offset;
 	info->perf_event.uprobe.cookie = event->bpf_cookie;
 	return 0;
@@ -3673,12 +3680,19 @@ static int bpf_perf_link_fill_tracepoint(const struct perf_event *event,
 {
 	char __user *uname;
 	u32 ulen;
+	int err;
 
 	uname = u64_to_user_ptr(info->perf_event.tracepoint.tp_name);
 	ulen = info->perf_event.tracepoint.name_len;
+	err = bpf_perf_link_fill_common(event, uname, &ulen, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+					NULL);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
 	info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_TRACEPOINT;
+	info->perf_event.tracepoint.name_len = ulen;
 	info->perf_event.tracepoint.cookie = event->bpf_cookie;
-	return bpf_perf_link_fill_common(event, uname, ulen, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int bpf_perf_link_fill_perf_event(const struct perf_event *event,
-- 
2.43.0


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-07 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <ZvqLanKfaO9dLlf4@krava>
2024-09-30 23:59 ` [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info tyrone-wu
2024-10-02 11:37   ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-02 21:38     ` [PATCH bpf v2] " tyrone-wu
2024-10-03 19:10       ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-03 20:23         ` [PATCH bpf v3] " tyrone-wu
2024-10-04 11:19           ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-04 15:40             ` [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] " tyrone-wu
2024-10-04 15:40               ` [PATCH bpf v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: fix perf_event link info name_len assertion tyrone-wu
2024-10-06  6:00               ` [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info Yafang Shao
2024-10-06 19:51                 ` [PATCH bpf v5 " tyrone-wu
2024-10-06 19:51                   ` [PATCH bpf v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: fix perf_event link info name_len assertion tyrone-wu
2024-10-07  2:09                     ` Yafang Shao
2024-10-07  2:09                   ` [PATCH bpf v5 1/2] bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info Yafang Shao
2024-10-07  8:07                   ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-07 18:29                     ` Tyrone Wu [this message]
2024-10-07 18:29                       ` [PATCH bpf v6 2/2] selftests/bpf: fix perf_event link info name_len assertion Tyrone Wu
2024-10-08  4:04                       ` [PATCH bpf v6 1/2] bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-08 16:43                         ` [PATCH bpf v7 " Tyrone Wu
2024-10-08 16:43                           ` [PATCH bpf v7 2/2] selftests/bpf: fix perf_event link info name_len assertion Tyrone Wu
2024-10-10  1:20                           ` [PATCH bpf v7 1/2] bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241007182933.8841-1-wudevelops@gmail.com \
    --to=wudevelops@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox