From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f202.google.com (mail-pl1-f202.google.com [209.85.214.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4E8D1E3DCE for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 23:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.202 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728518042; cv=none; b=Lh7o7l8NgXPRjRohsl6UP6RylAWaKlo2CR6Eb7DPZl0FH4T5MhN2i2nbOxA2LR/yf+8rqZxbBXT5tiPdFlscBnYGMVMZ20uXopion7aQGLXwNVaV168D2P4bIoAE5L94AssZflR9cIQ2/keAZL/vrnK83b68qvSnQC9QF1GZLtM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728518042; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Io44ykFGb6yTF3DLTeCKIJ30ekgDPjNCWHpSG7BLvew=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=h8UyCWQcgFTZ8m/jWZC/WKmO8fUJQ9RrGXldHIqjkI8vzZ5LYzDnY3J4aF6XduOHvf/RUG9b7nDoKGAoFkX2ZgLOgbapv3xdFFbni69qvJqh9Pi0DEoIQpZzC1PW4EUo1deV6Kki3NT8srQ4MES7VvkcSSSqOQzTYlfzu8RXXFo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--jstultz.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=BnzixRCm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.202 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--jstultz.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="BnzixRCm" Received: by mail-pl1-f202.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20b61ec80a2so3110905ad.3 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 16:54:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1728518040; x=1729122840; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zrFImt9yHea0Dhlj3hc8JVHZ3oMRdO+AL59PpwkgfAI=; b=BnzixRCmyVRiGU58QoBZa9lAg1u/gieY4AdulPA5nu7q5B04B07kwk2AgJ2DZWdXF7 QBQXpWdwPzMjhiBmIaXyQopdA0J6Az/3aGT/T3qfCJPBizXSCaFYhlRGjg7pgvgpUYP2 eaz268KmmGqw4TSJ6q+jYuFRYX2EGbh165pba7hunrYZ/RsOTgh8R7PEUwi5AN/TAMct yglSw4Wek+F/iSIzTvGB2FmIObsohqzCjvHXCSAODfjnsq4hq3WBWGZQeLtF31Y80zA6 XNj8LggAsWwPGaYCB7HVMwHB+AI0RISKTQca+iSfO+iL1oySAlAmBtKmZ9TTWbPZJG/i etZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728518040; x=1729122840; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zrFImt9yHea0Dhlj3hc8JVHZ3oMRdO+AL59PpwkgfAI=; b=oL6ZRZige8vY+3OoY8mQr5/oNcEdpYRZb1BM1cIoavUYC7f34qftloi6zpUNYq2JWr NADXqfl13mOKMEFiBr9HDOSbAOoYSltpg+tn4h3OBVPsxBkupYu11He8owh9QcTJ8uVH Odf/ujm7fyOeWMG4aF97CC8u6wtP/FcSXNlw6NIbfDhiv2YnkRv0TK3dGTH0xE9da6Lm CcRqV4+eq/z9VmPc4FySi6rO37gR17FHQ7fKUAsh5aw8KV3dTabnV1Ur0T3sNIh+eubF gNoqXq87mjZZZ0s41yXC5VQq9HPvXQ4fXX2eUL3K/WRPK5P8KdNnA2NN/kEKE561KvXF +exQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxLJWP0tR5bQW6B8Lr8F8m92FXjzK0M1sLrTHJjdG9l4pGbscG6 996c7q5GUa7zeeUIfo2IC1VsTgMOGcrtZ/D8ixpAUJIXpiSgzUNkKq1qz17TqGD63A1qPrU37sa 4ukQ1b8itCMwy5vkndaPURzl3JA8nPZK3nLeLTxpLjByyXXmWaE8QZqiI6JxN13HMqpB91SP+LZ ZgOniewsxNZo84p6yIpJ2Tj0X1ucckt5NbP0coANrmNxUc X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF/0JwJzRv+3hHAlSf/Jz4xfnbXJqkLcm92IiQaKdD4JFc1jkoUPLdK80EBX+MTJ1iypg0t+zpSuPDl X-Received: from jstultz-noogler2.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:24:72f4:c0a8:600]) (user=jstultz job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:902:fb04:b0:20b:44e3:65d2 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20c63706a65mr229195ad.4.1728518039163; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 16:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 16:53:34 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20241009235352.1614323-1-jstultz@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20241009235352.1614323-1-jstultz@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.0.rc0.187.ge670bccf7e-goog Message-ID: <20241009235352.1614323-2-jstultz@google.com> Subject: [RESEND x3][PATCH v12 1/7] locking/mutex: Remove wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock From: John Stultz To: LKML Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Joel Fernandes , Qais Yousef , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Valentin Schneider , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Zimuzo Ezeozue , Mel Gorman , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , "Paul E. McKenney" , Metin Kaya , Xuewen Yan , K Prateek Nayak , Thomas Gleixner , Daniel Lezcano , kernel-team@android.com, Metin Kaya , Davidlohr Bueso , John Stultz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" From: Peter Zijlstra In preparation to nest mutex::wait_lock under rq::lock we need to remove wakeups from under it. Do this by utilizing wake_qs to defer the wakeup until after the lock is dropped. Cc: Joel Fernandes Cc: Qais Yousef Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Vincent Guittot Cc: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: Valentin Schneider Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ben Segall Cc: Zimuzo Ezeozue Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Waiman Long Cc: Boqun Feng Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Metin Kaya Cc: Xuewen Yan Cc: K Prateek Nayak Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Daniel Lezcano Cc: kernel-team@android.com Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak Tested-by: Metin Kaya Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso Reviewed-by: Metin Kaya Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) [Heavily changed after 55f036ca7e74 ("locking: WW mutex cleanup") and 08295b3b5bee ("locking: Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait mutexes")] Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli [jstultz: rebased to mainline, added extra wake_up_q & init to avoid hangs, similar to Connor's rework of this patch] Signed-off-by: John Stultz --- v5: * Reverted back to an earlier version of this patch to undo the change that kept the wake_q in the ctx structure, as that broke the rule that the wake_q must always be on the stack, as its not safe for concurrency. v6: * Made tweaks suggested by Waiman Long v7: * Fixups to pass wake_qs down for PREEMPT_RT logic v10: * Switched preempt_enable to be lower close to the unlock as suggested by Valentin * Added additional preempt_disable coverage around the wake_q calls as again noted by Valentin v12: * Fixes and simplifications from K Prateek Nayak and Peter Zijlstra * Commit message tweak --- kernel/futex/pi.c | 6 +++- kernel/locking/mutex.c | 16 ++++++++--- kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------- kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c | 11 ++++++-- kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 3 +- kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c | 8 +++++- kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 4 +-- kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c | 3 +- kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h | 30 ++++++++++++-------- 9 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/futex/pi.c b/kernel/futex/pi.c index 5722467f2737..d62cca5ed8f4 100644 --- a/kernel/futex/pi.c +++ b/kernel/futex/pi.c @@ -922,6 +922,7 @@ int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ktime_t *time, int tryl struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter; struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; struct futex_q q = futex_q_init; + DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); int res, ret; if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUTEX_PI)) @@ -1018,8 +1019,11 @@ int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ktime_t *time, int tryl * such that futex_unlock_pi() is guaranteed to observe the waiter when * it sees the futex_q::pi_state. */ - ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter, current); + ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter, current, &wake_q); + preempt_disable(); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); + wake_up_q(&wake_q); + preempt_enable(); if (ret) { if (ret == 1) diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c index cbae8c0b89ab..6c94da061ec2 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c @@ -575,6 +575,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, const bool use_ww_ctx) { + DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); struct mutex_waiter waiter; struct ww_mutex *ww; int ret; @@ -625,7 +626,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas */ if (__mutex_trylock(lock)) { if (ww_ctx) - __ww_mutex_check_waiters(lock, ww_ctx); + __ww_mutex_check_waiters(lock, ww_ctx, &wake_q); goto skip_wait; } @@ -645,7 +646,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas * Add in stamp order, waking up waiters that must kill * themselves. */ - ret = __ww_mutex_add_waiter(&waiter, lock, ww_ctx); + ret = __ww_mutex_add_waiter(&waiter, lock, ww_ctx, &wake_q); if (ret) goto err_early_kill; } @@ -681,6 +682,10 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas } raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + /* Make sure we do wakeups before calling schedule */ + wake_up_q(&wake_q); + wake_q_init(&wake_q); + schedule_preempt_disabled(); first = __mutex_waiter_is_first(lock, &waiter); @@ -714,7 +719,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas */ if (!ww_ctx->is_wait_die && !__mutex_waiter_is_first(lock, &waiter)) - __ww_mutex_check_waiters(lock, ww_ctx); + __ww_mutex_check_waiters(lock, ww_ctx, &wake_q); } __mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter); @@ -730,6 +735,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx); raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + wake_up_q(&wake_q); preempt_enable(); return 0; @@ -741,6 +747,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter); mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, ip); + wake_up_q(&wake_q); preempt_enable(); return ret; } @@ -951,9 +958,10 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne if (owner & MUTEX_FLAG_HANDOFF) __mutex_handoff(lock, next); + preempt_disable(); raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); - wake_up_q(&wake_q); + preempt_enable(); } #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c index ebebd0eec7f6..8ada6567a141 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -34,13 +34,15 @@ static inline int __ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { return 0; } static inline void __ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { } @@ -1201,7 +1203,8 @@ static int __sched task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, struct task_struct *task, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, - enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk) + enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter = waiter; @@ -1245,7 +1248,10 @@ static int __sched task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, /* Check whether the waiter should back out immediately */ rtm = container_of(lock, struct rt_mutex, rtmutex); - res = __ww_mutex_add_waiter(waiter, rtm, ww_ctx); + preempt_disable(); + res = __ww_mutex_add_waiter(waiter, rtm, ww_ctx, wake_q); + wake_up_q(wake_q); + preempt_enable(); if (res) { raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock); rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); @@ -1679,7 +1685,8 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, unsigned int state, enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { struct rt_mutex *rtm = container_of(lock, struct rt_mutex, rtmutex); struct ww_mutex *ww = ww_container_of(rtm); @@ -1690,7 +1697,7 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, /* Try to acquire the lock again: */ if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL)) { if (build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx) { - __ww_mutex_check_waiters(rtm, ww_ctx); + __ww_mutex_check_waiters(rtm, ww_ctx, wake_q); ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx); } return 0; @@ -1700,7 +1707,7 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_RT); - ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, current, ww_ctx, chwalk); + ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, current, ww_ctx, chwalk, wake_q); if (likely(!ret)) ret = rt_mutex_slowlock_block(lock, ww_ctx, state, NULL, waiter); @@ -1708,7 +1715,7 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, /* acquired the lock */ if (build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx) { if (!ww_ctx->is_wait_die) - __ww_mutex_check_waiters(rtm, ww_ctx); + __ww_mutex_check_waiters(rtm, ww_ctx, wake_q); ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx); } } else { @@ -1730,7 +1737,8 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, static inline int __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, - unsigned int state) + unsigned int state, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter; int ret; @@ -1739,7 +1747,7 @@ static inline int __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, waiter.ww_ctx = ww_ctx; ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, ww_ctx, state, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, - &waiter); + &waiter, wake_q); debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter); return ret; @@ -1755,6 +1763,7 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, unsigned int state) { + DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); unsigned long flags; int ret; @@ -1776,8 +1785,11 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, * irqsave/restore variants. */ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags); - ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(lock, ww_ctx, state); + ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(lock, ww_ctx, state, &wake_q); + preempt_disable(); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); + wake_up_q(&wake_q); + preempt_enable(); rt_mutex_post_schedule(); return ret; @@ -1804,7 +1816,8 @@ static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, * rtlock_slowlock_locked - Slow path lock acquisition for RT locks * @lock: The underlying RT mutex */ -static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) +static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter; struct task_struct *owner; @@ -1821,7 +1834,7 @@ static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_RT); - task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK); + task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, wake_q); for (;;) { /* Try to acquire the lock again */ @@ -1832,7 +1845,11 @@ static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); else owner = NULL; + preempt_disable(); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); + wake_up_q(wake_q); + wake_q_init(wake_q); + preempt_enable(); if (!owner || !rtmutex_spin_on_owner(lock, &waiter, owner)) schedule_rtlock(); @@ -1857,10 +1874,14 @@ static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) static __always_inline void __sched rtlock_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) { unsigned long flags; + DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags); - rtlock_slowlock_locked(lock); + rtlock_slowlock_locked(lock, &wake_q); + preempt_disable(); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); + wake_up_q(&wake_q); + preempt_enable(); } #endif /* RT_MUTEX_BUILD_SPINLOCKS */ diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c index a6974d044593..747f2da16037 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c @@ -291,7 +291,8 @@ void __sched rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) */ int __sched __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, - struct task_struct *task) + struct task_struct *task, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { int ret; @@ -302,7 +303,7 @@ int __sched __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, /* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */ ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, NULL, - RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK); + RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK, wake_q); if (ret && !rt_mutex_owner(lock)) { /* @@ -341,12 +342,16 @@ int __sched rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct task_struct *task) { int ret; + DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); - ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(lock, waiter, task); + ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(lock, waiter, task, &wake_q); if (unlikely(ret)) remove_waiter(lock, waiter); + preempt_disable(); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); + wake_up_q(&wake_q); + preempt_enable(); return ret; } diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h index 1162e07cdaea..c38a2d2d4a7e 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h @@ -83,7 +83,8 @@ extern void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, extern void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock); extern int __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, - struct task_struct *task); + struct task_struct *task, + struct wake_q_head *); extern int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, struct task_struct *task); diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c index 34a59569db6b..9f4322c07486 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb, unsigned int state) { struct rt_mutex_base *rtm = &rwb->rtmutex; + DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); int ret; rwbase_pre_schedule(); @@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb, * For rwlocks this returns 0 unconditionally, so the below * !ret conditionals are optimized out. */ - ret = rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, state); + ret = rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, state, &wake_q); /* * On success the rtmutex is held, so there can't be a writer @@ -121,7 +122,12 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb, */ if (!ret) atomic_inc(&rwb->readers); + + preempt_disable(); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rtm->wait_lock); + wake_up_q(&wake_q); + preempt_enable(); + if (!ret) rwbase_rtmutex_unlock(rtm); diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c index 2bbb6eca5144..2ddb827e3bea 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c @@ -1413,8 +1413,8 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) #define rwbase_rtmutex_lock_state(rtm, state) \ __rt_mutex_lock(rtm, state) -#define rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, state) \ - __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, NULL, state) +#define rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, state, wq) \ + __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, NULL, state, wq) #define rwbase_rtmutex_unlock(rtm) \ __rt_mutex_unlock(rtm) diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c index 38e292454fcc..fb1810a14c9d 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c +++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c @@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ rwbase_rtmutex_lock_state(struct rt_mutex_base *rtm, unsigned int state) } static __always_inline int -rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *rtm, unsigned int state) +rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *rtm, unsigned int state, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { rtlock_slowlock_locked(rtm); return 0; diff --git a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h index 76d204b7d29c..a54bd16d0f17 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h +++ b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ __ww_ctx_less(struct ww_acquire_ctx *a, struct ww_acquire_ctx *b) */ static bool __ww_mutex_die(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter, - struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { if (!ww_ctx->is_wait_die) return false; @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ __ww_mutex_die(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter, #ifndef WW_RT debug_mutex_wake_waiter(lock, waiter); #endif - wake_up_process(waiter->task); + wake_q_add(wake_q, waiter->task); } return true; @@ -299,7 +299,8 @@ __ww_mutex_die(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter, */ static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, - struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx) + struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { struct task_struct *owner = __ww_mutex_owner(lock); @@ -331,7 +332,7 @@ static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct MUTEX *lock, * wakeup pending to re-read the wounded state. */ if (owner != current) - wake_up_process(owner); + wake_q_add(wake_q, owner); return true; } @@ -352,7 +353,8 @@ static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct MUTEX *lock, * The current task must not be on the wait list. */ static void -__ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) +__ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { struct MUTEX_WAITER *cur; @@ -364,8 +366,8 @@ __ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) if (!cur->ww_ctx) continue; - if (__ww_mutex_die(lock, cur, ww_ctx) || - __ww_mutex_wound(lock, cur->ww_ctx, ww_ctx)) + if (__ww_mutex_die(lock, cur, ww_ctx, wake_q) || + __ww_mutex_wound(lock, cur->ww_ctx, ww_ctx, wake_q)) break; } } @@ -377,6 +379,8 @@ __ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) static __always_inline void ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx) { + DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); + ww_mutex_lock_acquired(lock, ctx); /* @@ -405,8 +409,11 @@ ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx) * die or wound us. */ lock_wait_lock(&lock->base); - __ww_mutex_check_waiters(&lock->base, ctx); + __ww_mutex_check_waiters(&lock->base, ctx, &wake_q); + preempt_disable(); unlock_wait_lock(&lock->base); + wake_up_q(&wake_q); + preempt_enable(); } static __always_inline int @@ -488,7 +495,8 @@ __ww_mutex_check_kill(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter, static inline int __ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter, struct MUTEX *lock, - struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { struct MUTEX_WAITER *cur, *pos = NULL; bool is_wait_die; @@ -532,7 +540,7 @@ __ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter, pos = cur; /* Wait-Die: ensure younger waiters die. */ - __ww_mutex_die(lock, cur, ww_ctx); + __ww_mutex_die(lock, cur, ww_ctx, wake_q); } __ww_waiter_add(lock, waiter, pos); @@ -550,7 +558,7 @@ __ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter, * such that either we or the fastpath will wound @ww->ctx. */ smp_mb(); - __ww_mutex_wound(lock, ww_ctx, ww->ctx); + __ww_mutex_wound(lock, ww_ctx, ww->ctx, wake_q); } return 0; -- 2.47.0.rc0.187.ge670bccf7e-goog