Re: [PATCH 6.10 000/482] 6.10.14-rc1 review

Jon Hunter
2024-10-10T10:40:50Z

On 09/10/2024 22:59, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 07:58:55AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On Tue, 08 Oct 2024 14:01:03 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.14 release.
>>> There are 482 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:55:15 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.14-rc1.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>> All tests passing for Tegra ...
>>
>> Test results for stable-v6.10:
>>    10 builds:    10 pass, 0 fail
>>    26 boots:    26 pass, 0 fail
>>    116 tests:    116 pass, 0 fail
>>
>> Linux version:    6.10.14-rc1-gd44129966591
>> Boards tested:    tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>>                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
>>                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
>>                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
>>
>> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>
> Did this one not fail on the same cgroup issue as 6.11? we had the
> offending commit in all trees.

I did not see any failure there. However, same tests are run and so it
should have. I can run it again to double check.

Jon

--
nvpublic