public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] sched_ext: bypass mode shouldn't depend on ops.select_cpu()
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 13:15:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241010181517.GC28209@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241009214411.681233-5-tj@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3608 bytes --]

On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 11:41:00AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:

Hi Tejun,

> Bypass mode was depending on ops.select_cpu() which can't be trusted as with
> the rest of the BPF scheduler. Always enable and use scx_select_cpu_dfl() in
> bypass mode.

Could you please clarify why we can't trust ops.select_cpu()? Even if it
returns a bogus, offline, etc, CPU, shouldn't core.c take care of
finding a valid CPU for us in select_fallback_rq()?

Assuming we really do require a valid CPU here in bypass mode, do we
need to reset the state of the idle masks for the case of
!scx_builtin_idle_enabled? The masks won't necessarily reflect the set
of online CPUs if we haven't been updating it, right?

Thanks,
David

> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/ext.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index 1cae18000de1..c5cda7368de5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -3126,7 +3126,7 @@ static int select_task_rq_scx(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flag
>  	if (unlikely(wake_flags & WF_EXEC))
>  		return prev_cpu;
>  
> -	if (SCX_HAS_OP(select_cpu)) {
> +	if (SCX_HAS_OP(select_cpu) && !scx_rq_bypassing(task_rq(p))) {
>  		s32 cpu;
>  		struct task_struct **ddsp_taskp;
>  
> @@ -3191,7 +3191,7 @@ void __scx_update_idle(struct rq *rq, bool idle)
>  {
>  	int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
>  
> -	if (SCX_HAS_OP(update_idle)) {
> +	if (SCX_HAS_OP(update_idle) && !scx_rq_bypassing(rq)) {
>  		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_REST, update_idle, cpu_of(rq), idle);
>  		if (!static_branch_unlikely(&scx_builtin_idle_enabled))
>  			return;
> @@ -4254,21 +4254,23 @@ bool task_should_scx(struct task_struct *p)
>   * the DISABLING state and then cycling the queued tasks through dequeue/enqueue
>   * to force global FIFO scheduling.
>   *
> - * a. ops.enqueue() is ignored and tasks are queued in simple global FIFO order.
> - *    %SCX_OPS_ENQ_LAST is also ignored.
> + * - ops.select_cpu() is ignored and the default select_cpu() is used.
>   *
> - * b. ops.dispatch() is ignored.
> + * - ops.enqueue() is ignored and tasks are queued in simple global FIFO order.
> + *   %SCX_OPS_ENQ_LAST is also ignored.
>   *
> - * c. balance_scx() does not set %SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP on non-zero slice as slice
> - *    can't be trusted. Whenever a tick triggers, the running task is rotated to
> - *    the tail of the queue with core_sched_at touched.
> + * - ops.dispatch() is ignored.
>   *
> - * d. pick_next_task() suppresses zero slice warning.
> + * - balance_scx() does not set %SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP on non-zero slice as slice
> + *   can't be trusted. Whenever a tick triggers, the running task is rotated to
> + *   the tail of the queue with core_sched_at touched.
>   *
> - * e. scx_bpf_kick_cpu() is disabled to avoid irq_work malfunction during PM
> - *    operations.
> + * - pick_next_task() suppresses zero slice warning.
>   *
> - * f. scx_prio_less() reverts to the default core_sched_at order.
> + * - scx_bpf_kick_cpu() is disabled to avoid irq_work malfunction during PM
> + *   operations.
> + *
> + * - scx_prio_less() reverts to the default core_sched_at order.
>   */
>  static void scx_ops_bypass(bool bypass)
>  {
> @@ -4338,7 +4340,7 @@ static void scx_ops_bypass(bool bypass)
>  
>  		rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
>  
> -		/* kick to restore ticks */
> +		/* resched to restore ticks and idle state */
>  		resched_cpu(cpu);
>  	}
>  }
> -- 
> 2.46.2
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-10 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-09 21:40 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.12-fixes] sched_ext: Fix RCU and other stalls while iterating tasks during enable/disable Tejun Heo
2024-10-09 21:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] Revert "sched_ext: Use shorter slice while bypassing" Tejun Heo
2024-10-10 17:59   ` David Vernet
2024-10-09 21:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched_ext: Start schedulers with consistent p->scx.slice values Tejun Heo
2024-10-10 18:00   ` David Vernet
2024-10-09 21:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched_ext: Move scx_buildin_idle_enabled check to scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl() Tejun Heo
2024-10-09 21:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched_ext: bypass mode shouldn't depend on ops.select_cpu() Tejun Heo
2024-10-10 18:15   ` David Vernet [this message]
2024-10-10 18:26     ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-10 18:31       ` David Vernet
2024-10-09 21:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched_ext: Move scx_tasks_lock handling into scx_task_iter helpers Tejun Heo
2024-10-10 18:36   ` David Vernet
2024-10-09 21:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched_ext: Don't hold scx_tasks_lock for too long Tejun Heo
2024-10-10 19:12   ` David Vernet
2024-10-10 21:38     ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-10 23:38       ` Waiman Long
2024-10-10 21:43 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.12-fixes] sched_ext: Fix RCU and other stalls while iterating tasks during enable/disable Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241010181517.GC28209@maniforge \
    --to=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sched-ext@meta.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox