From: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Diego Vieira <diego.daniel.professional@gmail.com>,
n@nfraprado.net, andrealmeid@riseup.net, vinicius@nukelet.com,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] lib/tests/kfifo_kunit.c: add tests for the kfifo structure
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 15:25:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241011072509.3068328-6-davidgow@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241011072509.3068328-2-davidgow@google.com>
From: Diego Vieira <diego.daniel.professional@gmail.com>
Add KUnit tests for the kfifo data structure.
They test the vast majority of macros defined in the kfifo
header (include/linux/kfifo.h).
These are inspired by the existing tests for the doubly
linked list in lib/tests/list-test.c (previously at lib/list-test.c) [1].
Note that this patch depends on the patch that moves the KUnit tests on
lib/ into lib/tests/ [2].
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/list-test.c?h=v6.11-rc6
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240720181025.work.002-kees@kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Diego Vieira <diego.daniel.professional@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---
lib/Kconfig.debug | 14 +++
lib/tests/Makefile | 1 +
lib/tests/kfifo_kunit.c | 224 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 239 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 lib/tests/kfifo_kunit.c
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 6571243ac232..134d077562a9 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -2673,6 +2673,20 @@ config SYSCTL_KUNIT_TEST
If unsure, say N.
+config KFIFO_KUNIT_TEST
+ tristate "KUnit Test for the generic kernel FIFO implementation" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ depends on KUNIT
+ default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ help
+ This builds the generic FIFO implementation KUnit test suite.
+ It tests that the API and basic functionality of the kfifo type
+ and associated macros.
+
+ For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer
+ to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
+
+ If unsure, say N.
+
config LIST_KUNIT_TEST
tristate "KUnit Test for Kernel Linked-list structures" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
depends on KUNIT
diff --git a/lib/tests/Makefile b/lib/tests/Makefile
index 41689f0b7c97..380f95b003fc 100644
--- a/lib/tests/Makefile
+++ b/lib/tests/Makefile
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_IOV_ITER) += kunit_iov_iter.o
obj-$(CONFIG_IS_SIGNED_TYPE_KUNIT_TEST) += is_signed_type_kunit.o
obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o
obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list-test.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KFIFO_KUNIT_TEST) += kfifo_kunit.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT) += test_list_sort.o
obj-$(CONFIG_LINEAR_RANGES_TEST) += test_linear_ranges.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MEMCPY_KUNIT_TEST) += memcpy_kunit.o
diff --git a/lib/tests/kfifo_kunit.c b/lib/tests/kfifo_kunit.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a85eedc3195a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/tests/kfifo_kunit.c
@@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit test for the generic kernel FIFO implementation.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Diego Vieira <diego.daniel.professional@gmail.com>
+ */
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+#include <linux/kfifo.h>
+
+#define KFIFO_SIZE 32
+#define N_ELEMENTS 5
+
+static void kfifo_test_reset_should_clear_the_fifo(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+ kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 1);
+ kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 2);
+ kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 3);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 3);
+
+ kfifo_reset(&my_fifo);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_is_empty(&my_fifo));
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_define_should_define_an_empty_fifo(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_is_empty(&my_fifo));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 0);
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_len_should_ret_n_of_stored_elements(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ u8 buffer1[N_ELEMENTS];
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < N_ELEMENTS; i++)
+ buffer1[i] = i + 1;
+
+ DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 0);
+
+ kfifo_in(&my_fifo, buffer1, N_ELEMENTS);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), N_ELEMENTS);
+
+ kfifo_in(&my_fifo, buffer1, N_ELEMENTS);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), N_ELEMENTS * 2);
+
+ kfifo_reset(&my_fifo);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 0);
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_put_should_insert_and_get_should_pop(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ u8 out_data = 0;
+ int processed_elements;
+ u8 elements[] = { 3, 5, 11 };
+
+ DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+ // If the fifo is empty, get returns 0
+ processed_elements = kfifo_get(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_data, 0);
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++)
+ kfifo_put(&my_fifo, elements[i]);
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+ processed_elements = kfifo_get(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_data, elements[i]);
+ }
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_in_should_insert_multiple_elements(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ u8 in_buffer[] = { 11, 25, 65 };
+ u8 out_data;
+ int processed_elements;
+
+ DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+ kfifo_in(&my_fifo, in_buffer, 3);
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+ processed_elements = kfifo_get(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_data, in_buffer[i]);
+ }
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_out_should_pop_multiple_elements(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ u8 in_buffer[] = { 11, 25, 65 };
+ u8 out_buffer[3];
+ int copied_elements;
+
+ DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++)
+ kfifo_put(&my_fifo, in_buffer[i]);
+
+ copied_elements = kfifo_out(&my_fifo, out_buffer, 3);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, copied_elements, 3);
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_buffer[i], in_buffer[i]);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_is_empty(&my_fifo));
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_dec_init_should_define_an_empty_fifo(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ DECLARE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+ INIT_KFIFO(my_fifo);
+
+ // my_fifo is a struct with an inplace buffer
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, __is_kfifo_ptr(&my_fifo));
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo));
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_define_should_equal_declare_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ // declare a variable my_fifo of type struct kfifo of u8
+ DECLARE_KFIFO(my_fifo1, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+ // initialize the my_fifo variable
+ INIT_KFIFO(my_fifo1);
+
+ // DEFINE_KFIFO declares the variable with the initial value
+ // essentially the same as calling DECLARE_KFIFO and INIT_KFIFO
+ DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo2, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+ // my_fifo1 and my_fifo2 have the same size
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(my_fifo1), sizeof(my_fifo2));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo1),
+ kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo2));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_is_empty(&my_fifo1),
+ kfifo_is_empty(&my_fifo2));
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_alloc_should_initiliaze_a_ptr_fifo(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int ret;
+ DECLARE_KFIFO_PTR(my_fifo, u8);
+
+ INIT_KFIFO(my_fifo);
+
+ // kfifo_initialized returns false signaling the buffer pointer is NULL
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo));
+
+ // kfifo_alloc allocates the buffer
+ ret = kfifo_alloc(&my_fifo, KFIFO_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, ret, 0, "Memory allocation should succeed");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo));
+
+ // kfifo_free frees the buffer
+ kfifo_free(&my_fifo);
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_peek_should_not_remove_elements(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ u8 out_data;
+ int processed_elements;
+
+ DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+ // If the fifo is empty, peek returns 0
+ processed_elements = kfifo_peek(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 0);
+
+ kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 3);
+ kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 5);
+ kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 11);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 3);
+
+ processed_elements = kfifo_peek(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_data, 3);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 3);
+
+ // Using peek doesn't remove the element
+ // so the read element and the fifo length
+ // remains the same
+ processed_elements = kfifo_peek(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_data, 3);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 3);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case kfifo_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_reset_should_clear_the_fifo),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_define_should_define_an_empty_fifo),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_len_should_ret_n_of_stored_elements),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_put_should_insert_and_get_should_pop),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_in_should_insert_multiple_elements),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_out_should_pop_multiple_elements),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_dec_init_should_define_an_empty_fifo),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_define_should_equal_declare_init),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_alloc_should_initiliaze_a_ptr_fifo),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_peek_should_not_remove_elements),
+ {},
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite kfifo_test_module = {
+ .name = "kfifo",
+ .test_cases = kfifo_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(&kfifo_test_module);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Diego Vieira <diego.daniel.professional@gmail.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("KUnit test for the kernel FIFO");
--
2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-11 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-11 7:25 [PATCH 0/6] KUnit test moves / renames David Gow
2024-10-11 7:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] lib: math: Move kunit tests into tests/ subdir David Gow
2024-10-11 8:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-06 8:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-06 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2024-11-07 7:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-09 9:39 ` David Gow
2024-10-11 7:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] lib/math: Add int_log test suite David Gow
2024-10-11 7:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] lib: Move KUnit tests into tests/ subdirectory David Gow
2024-10-11 9:17 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-11 10:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-11 13:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-10-11 13:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-11 14:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-10-11 15:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-11 16:29 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-10-11 17:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-11 17:20 ` Kees Cook
2024-10-11 7:25 ` David Gow [this message]
2024-10-11 7:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] unicode: kunit: refactor selftest to kunit tests David Gow
2024-10-15 13:20 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-10-11 7:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] unicode: kunit: change tests filename and path David Gow
2024-10-15 13:21 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-10-11 13:53 ` [PATCH 0/6] KUnit test moves / renames Shuah Khan
2025-02-08 21:14 ` Kees Cook
[not found] ` <CAKRRn-cFvCOay-J6BEsGjcB309_k-4rr9u=yKU7BCmiW-OcVcA@mail.gmail.com>
2025-02-09 23:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241011072509.3068328-6-davidgow@google.com \
--to=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrealmeid@riseup.net \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=diego.daniel.professional@gmail.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=n@nfraprado.net \
--cc=rmoar@google.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vinicius@nukelet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox