public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	 Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>,  Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	 Diego Vieira <diego.daniel.professional@gmail.com>,
	n@nfraprado.net,  andrealmeid@riseup.net, vinicius@nukelet.com,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] lib/tests/kfifo_kunit.c: add tests for the kfifo structure
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 15:25:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241011072509.3068328-6-davidgow@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241011072509.3068328-2-davidgow@google.com>

From: Diego Vieira <diego.daniel.professional@gmail.com>

Add KUnit tests for the kfifo data structure.
They test the vast majority of macros defined in the kfifo
header (include/linux/kfifo.h).

These are inspired by the existing tests for the doubly
linked list in lib/tests/list-test.c (previously at lib/list-test.c) [1].

Note that this patch depends on the patch that moves the KUnit tests on
lib/ into lib/tests/ [2].

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/list-test.c?h=v6.11-rc6
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240720181025.work.002-kees@kernel.org/

Signed-off-by: Diego Vieira <diego.daniel.professional@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---
 lib/Kconfig.debug       |  14 +++
 lib/tests/Makefile      |   1 +
 lib/tests/kfifo_kunit.c | 224 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 239 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 lib/tests/kfifo_kunit.c

diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 6571243ac232..134d077562a9 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -2673,6 +2673,20 @@ config SYSCTL_KUNIT_TEST
 
 	  If unsure, say N.
 
+config KFIFO_KUNIT_TEST
+	tristate "KUnit Test for the generic kernel FIFO implementation" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	depends on KUNIT
+	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	help
+	  This builds the generic FIFO implementation KUnit test suite.
+	  It tests that the API and basic functionality of the kfifo type
+	  and associated macros.
+
+	  For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer
+	  to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
 config LIST_KUNIT_TEST
 	tristate "KUnit Test for Kernel Linked-list structures" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 	depends on KUNIT
diff --git a/lib/tests/Makefile b/lib/tests/Makefile
index 41689f0b7c97..380f95b003fc 100644
--- a/lib/tests/Makefile
+++ b/lib/tests/Makefile
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_IOV_ITER) += kunit_iov_iter.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_IS_SIGNED_TYPE_KUNIT_TEST) += is_signed_type_kunit.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list-test.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KFIFO_KUNIT_TEST) += kfifo_kunit.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT) += test_list_sort.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_LINEAR_RANGES_TEST) += test_linear_ranges.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MEMCPY_KUNIT_TEST) += memcpy_kunit.o
diff --git a/lib/tests/kfifo_kunit.c b/lib/tests/kfifo_kunit.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a85eedc3195a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/tests/kfifo_kunit.c
@@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit test for the generic kernel FIFO implementation.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Diego Vieira <diego.daniel.professional@gmail.com>
+ */
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+#include <linux/kfifo.h>
+
+#define KFIFO_SIZE 32
+#define N_ELEMENTS 5
+
+static void kfifo_test_reset_should_clear_the_fifo(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 1);
+	kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 2);
+	kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 3);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 3);
+
+	kfifo_reset(&my_fifo);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_is_empty(&my_fifo));
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_define_should_define_an_empty_fifo(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_is_empty(&my_fifo));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 0);
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_len_should_ret_n_of_stored_elements(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	u8 buffer1[N_ELEMENTS];
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < N_ELEMENTS; i++)
+		buffer1[i] = i + 1;
+
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 0);
+
+	kfifo_in(&my_fifo, buffer1, N_ELEMENTS);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), N_ELEMENTS);
+
+	kfifo_in(&my_fifo, buffer1, N_ELEMENTS);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), N_ELEMENTS * 2);
+
+	kfifo_reset(&my_fifo);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 0);
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_put_should_insert_and_get_should_pop(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	u8 out_data = 0;
+	int processed_elements;
+	u8 elements[] = { 3, 5, 11 };
+
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	// If the fifo is empty, get returns 0
+	processed_elements = kfifo_get(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_data, 0);
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++)
+		kfifo_put(&my_fifo, elements[i]);
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+		processed_elements = kfifo_get(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 1);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_data, elements[i]);
+	}
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_in_should_insert_multiple_elements(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	u8 in_buffer[] = { 11, 25, 65 };
+	u8 out_data;
+	int processed_elements;
+
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	kfifo_in(&my_fifo, in_buffer, 3);
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+		processed_elements = kfifo_get(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 1);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_data, in_buffer[i]);
+	}
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_out_should_pop_multiple_elements(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	u8 in_buffer[] = { 11, 25, 65 };
+	u8 out_buffer[3];
+	int copied_elements;
+
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++)
+		kfifo_put(&my_fifo, in_buffer[i]);
+
+	copied_elements = kfifo_out(&my_fifo, out_buffer, 3);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, copied_elements, 3);
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++)
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_buffer[i], in_buffer[i]);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_is_empty(&my_fifo));
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_dec_init_should_define_an_empty_fifo(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	DECLARE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	INIT_KFIFO(my_fifo);
+
+	// my_fifo is a struct with an inplace buffer
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, __is_kfifo_ptr(&my_fifo));
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo));
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_define_should_equal_declare_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	// declare a variable my_fifo of type struct kfifo of u8
+	DECLARE_KFIFO(my_fifo1, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+	// initialize the my_fifo variable
+	INIT_KFIFO(my_fifo1);
+
+	// DEFINE_KFIFO declares the variable with the initial value
+	// essentially the same as calling DECLARE_KFIFO and INIT_KFIFO
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo2, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	// my_fifo1 and my_fifo2 have the same size
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(my_fifo1), sizeof(my_fifo2));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo1),
+			kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo2));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_is_empty(&my_fifo1),
+			kfifo_is_empty(&my_fifo2));
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_alloc_should_initiliaze_a_ptr_fifo(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int ret;
+	DECLARE_KFIFO_PTR(my_fifo, u8);
+
+	INIT_KFIFO(my_fifo);
+
+	// kfifo_initialized returns false signaling the buffer pointer is NULL
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo));
+
+	// kfifo_alloc allocates the buffer
+	ret = kfifo_alloc(&my_fifo, KFIFO_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, ret, 0, "Memory allocation should succeed");
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo));
+
+	// kfifo_free frees the buffer
+	kfifo_free(&my_fifo);
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_peek_should_not_remove_elements(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	u8 out_data;
+	int processed_elements;
+
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	// If the fifo is empty, peek returns 0
+	processed_elements = kfifo_peek(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 0);
+
+	kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 3);
+	kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 5);
+	kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 11);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 3);
+
+	processed_elements = kfifo_peek(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_data, 3);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 3);
+
+	// Using peek doesn't remove the element
+	// so the read element and the fifo length
+	// remains the same
+	processed_elements = kfifo_peek(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_data, 3);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 3);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case kfifo_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_reset_should_clear_the_fifo),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_define_should_define_an_empty_fifo),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_len_should_ret_n_of_stored_elements),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_put_should_insert_and_get_should_pop),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_in_should_insert_multiple_elements),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_out_should_pop_multiple_elements),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_dec_init_should_define_an_empty_fifo),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_define_should_equal_declare_init),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_alloc_should_initiliaze_a_ptr_fifo),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_peek_should_not_remove_elements),
+	{},
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite kfifo_test_module = {
+	.name = "kfifo",
+	.test_cases = kfifo_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(&kfifo_test_module);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Diego Vieira <diego.daniel.professional@gmail.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("KUnit test for the kernel FIFO");
-- 
2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-11  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-11  7:25 [PATCH 0/6] KUnit test moves / renames David Gow
2024-10-11  7:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] lib: math: Move kunit tests into tests/ subdir David Gow
2024-10-11  8:59   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-06  8:33     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-06 21:17       ` Andrew Morton
2024-11-07  7:34         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-09  9:39           ` David Gow
2024-10-11  7:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] lib/math: Add int_log test suite David Gow
2024-10-11  7:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] lib: Move KUnit tests into tests/ subdirectory David Gow
2024-10-11  9:17   ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-11 10:44   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-11 13:38     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-10-11 13:57       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-11 14:14         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-10-11 15:21           ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-11 16:29             ` Christophe Leroy
2024-10-11 17:22               ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-11 17:20   ` Kees Cook
2024-10-11  7:25 ` David Gow [this message]
2024-10-11  7:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] unicode: kunit: refactor selftest to kunit tests David Gow
2024-10-15 13:20   ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-10-11  7:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] unicode: kunit: change tests filename and path David Gow
2024-10-15 13:21   ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-10-11 13:53 ` [PATCH 0/6] KUnit test moves / renames Shuah Khan
2025-02-08 21:14   ` Kees Cook
     [not found]     ` <CAKRRn-cFvCOay-J6BEsGjcB309_k-4rr9u=yKU7BCmiW-OcVcA@mail.gmail.com>
2025-02-09 23:47       ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241011072509.3068328-6-davidgow@google.com \
    --to=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrealmeid@riseup.net \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=diego.daniel.professional@gmail.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=n@nfraprado.net \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=vinicius@nukelet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox