From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Attila Fazekas <afazekas@redhat.com>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 8/9] rtla/timerlat: Make timerlat_top_cpu->*_count unsigned long long
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 13:30:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241011173029.026778216@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20241011173010.441043942@goodmis.org
From: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>
Most fields of struct timerlat_top_cpu are unsigned long long, but the
fields {irq,thread,user}_count are int (32-bit signed).
This leads to overflow when tracing on a large number of CPUs for a long
enough time:
$ rtla timerlat top -a20 -c 1-127 -d 12h
...
0 12:00:00 | IRQ Timer Latency (us) | Thread Timer Latency (us)
CPU COUNT | cur min avg max | cur min avg max
1 #43200096 | 0 0 1 2 | 3 2 6 12
...
127 #43200096 | 0 0 1 2 | 3 2 5 11
ALL #119144 e4 | 0 5 4 | 2 28 16
The average latency should be 0-1 for IRQ and 5-6 for thread, but is
reported as 5 and 28, about 4 to 5 times more, due to the count
overflowing when summed over all CPUs: 43200096 * 127 = 5486412192,
however, 1191444898 (= 5486412192 mod MAX_INT) is reported instead, as
seen on the last line of the output, and the averages are thus ~4.6
times higher than they should be (5486412192 / 1191444898 = ~4.6).
Fix the issue by changing {irq,thread,user}_count fields to unsigned
long long, similarly to other fields in struct timerlat_top_cpu and to
the count variable in timerlat_top_print_sum.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241011121015.2868751-1-tglozar@redhat.com
Reported-by: Attila Fazekas <afazekas@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_top.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_top.c b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_top.c
index 94a2f5bbaeb7..7fb85c8ee3bc 100644
--- a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_top.c
+++ b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_top.c
@@ -54,9 +54,9 @@ struct timerlat_top_params {
};
struct timerlat_top_cpu {
- int irq_count;
- int thread_count;
- int user_count;
+ unsigned long long irq_count;
+ unsigned long long thread_count;
+ unsigned long long user_count;
unsigned long long cur_irq;
unsigned long long min_irq;
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static void timerlat_top_print(struct osnoise_tool *top, int cpu)
/*
* Unless trace is being lost, IRQ counter is always the max.
*/
- trace_seq_printf(s, "%3d #%-9d |", cpu, cpu_data->irq_count);
+ trace_seq_printf(s, "%3d #%-9llu |", cpu, cpu_data->irq_count);
if (!cpu_data->irq_count) {
trace_seq_printf(s, "%s %s %s %s |", no_value, no_value, no_value, no_value);
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-11 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-11 17:30 [for-next][PATCH 0/9] rtla: Updates for 6.13 Steven Rostedt
2024-10-11 17:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 1/9] rtla: use the definition for stdout fd when calling isatty() Steven Rostedt
2024-10-11 17:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 2/9] tools/rv: Correct the grammatical errors in the comments Steven Rostedt
2024-10-11 17:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 3/9] tools/rv: Correct the grammatical errors in the comments[2] Steven Rostedt
2024-10-11 17:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 4/9] rv: Fix a typo Steven Rostedt
2024-10-11 17:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 5/9] rtla: Fix consistency in getopt_long for timerlat_hist Steven Rostedt
2024-10-11 17:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 6/9] tools/rtla: drop __NR_sched_getattr Steven Rostedt
2024-10-11 17:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 7/9] tools/rtla: fix collision with glibc sched_attr/sched_set_attr Steven Rostedt
2024-10-11 17:30 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2024-10-11 17:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 9/9] rtla/timerlat: Make timerlat_hist_cpu->*_count unsigned long long Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241011173029.026778216@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=afazekas@redhat.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglozar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox