From: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>,
Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
kernel-team@android.com, Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v13 6/7] sched: Split out __schedule() deactivate task logic into a helper
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 16:25:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241011232525.2513424-7-jstultz@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241011232525.2513424-1-jstultz@google.com>
As we're going to re-use the deactivation logic,
split it into a helper.
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>
Cc: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Tested-by: Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
---
v6:
* Define function as static to avoid "no previous prototype"
warnings as Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
v7:
* Rename state task_state to be more clear, as suggested by
Metin Kaya
v11:
* Return early to simplify indentation, and drop unused bool
return (will be introduced later when its needed) as sugggested
by Qais.
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 615fc7a7b17c..7f949bb9e2a8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6483,6 +6483,44 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
#define SM_PREEMPT 1
#define SM_RTLOCK_WAIT 2
+/*
+ * Helper function for __schedule()
+ *
+ * If a task does not have signals pending, deactivate it
+ * Otherwise marks the task's __state as RUNNING
+ */
+static void try_to_deactivate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
+ unsigned long task_state)
+{
+ int flags = DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK;
+
+ if (signal_pending_state(task_state, p)) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(p->__state, TASK_RUNNING);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ p->sched_contributes_to_load =
+ (task_state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) &&
+ !(task_state & TASK_NOLOAD) &&
+ !(task_state & TASK_FROZEN);
+
+ if (unlikely(is_special_task_state(task_state)))
+ flags |= DEQUEUE_SPECIAL;
+
+ /*
+ * __schedule() ttwu()
+ * prev_state = prev->state; if (p->on_rq && ...)
+ * if (prev_state) goto out;
+ * p->on_rq = 0; smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
+ * p->state = TASK_WAKING
+ *
+ * Where __schedule() and ttwu() have matching control dependencies.
+ *
+ * After this, schedule() must not care about p->state any more.
+ */
+ block_task(rq, p, flags);
+}
+
/*
* __schedule() is the main scheduler function.
*
@@ -6590,32 +6628,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(int sched_mode)
goto picked;
}
} else if (!preempt && prev_state) {
- if (signal_pending_state(prev_state, prev)) {
- WRITE_ONCE(prev->__state, TASK_RUNNING);
- } else {
- int flags = DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK;
-
- prev->sched_contributes_to_load =
- (prev_state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) &&
- !(prev_state & TASK_NOLOAD) &&
- !(prev_state & TASK_FROZEN);
-
- if (unlikely(is_special_task_state(prev_state)))
- flags |= DEQUEUE_SPECIAL;
-
- /*
- * __schedule() ttwu()
- * prev_state = prev->state; if (p->on_rq && ...)
- * if (prev_state) goto out;
- * p->on_rq = 0; smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
- * p->state = TASK_WAKING
- *
- * Where __schedule() and ttwu() have matching control dependencies.
- *
- * After this, schedule() must not care about p->state any more.
- */
- block_task(rq, prev, flags);
- }
+ try_to_deactivate_task(rq, prev, prev_state);
switch_count = &prev->nvcsw;
}
--
2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-11 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-11 23:25 [PATCH v13 0/7] Preparatory changes for Proxy Execution v13 John Stultz
2024-10-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v13 1/7] locking/mutex: Remove wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock John Stultz
2024-11-13 18:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-11-13 19:07 ` John Stultz
2024-11-13 21:52 ` [RFC][PATCH] locking: rtmutex: Fix wake_q logic in task_blocks_on_rt_mutex John Stultz
2024-11-13 22:49 ` Anders Roxell
2024-11-14 6:37 ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-11-14 18:40 ` John Stultz
2024-10-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v13 2/7] locking/mutex: Make mutex::wait_lock irq safe John Stultz
2024-10-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v13 3/7] locking/mutex: Expose __mutex_owner() John Stultz
2024-10-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v13 4/7] sched: Add move_queued_task_locked helper John Stultz
2024-10-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v13 5/7] sched: Consolidate pick_*_task to task_is_pushable helper John Stultz
2024-10-11 23:25 ` John Stultz [this message]
2024-10-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v13 7/7] sched: Split scheduler and execution contexts John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241011232525.2513424-7-jstultz@google.com \
--to=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=Metin.Kaya@arm.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
--cc=zezeozue@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox