From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE0CC282F4; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728748453; cv=none; b=Eo4dJAg7KO3KMI5d3z1exzYYTT9/+3itPTI9KOtd55aflOJqceS9woriS2Ae0892qBafh03Xl4E6VUVFKrvg7fT7NkG7WInaL9Rp/5kdYEaAVcVaoaGdt4CYG2dYWqabNRNDMCuVTC0BZpuZ6r2SEOxUCGNr0C3Li4+YnitalBk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728748453; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/xFDZcInBNyx3eprUGQX66jP+aFDV4sLoV0PFfDSzE8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=a2Ck6FkmGjfawSqQXcpK3XYWEuevdQfLZH+GV4VJzYmj599ndeFSFXyUiiPMuI50j5JlKf/cco8axhEs2ZcVYmgnrSh98zdSaUVPXPVPzUe3a0rYZdXjjzhZ885bUvh3k7vsSe+PxiwZ4GZGqwrHDGxKzpkSBvq6/H/UNu84wEg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=jS+BECPX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="jS+BECPX" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1728748452; x=1760284452; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=/xFDZcInBNyx3eprUGQX66jP+aFDV4sLoV0PFfDSzE8=; b=jS+BECPXjTXcpCLOwNgDm9c6etndAX09bjXCfoVgy0RNr8tEsD9BL177 VJnIJTlB4SKVhAlLXeltrGhwARO5SONOT7OzYbQgWhTK7KeVHBFj7pRRD NsnyuaRvFyptPKBnHAJIBMFsXaYOSooLXWiVxFmSn6lMT88K7muk6u5an PmbBjoptnrXyvZkvAHnT5fmjjtwuMCECvA2RxT5qGGlnEaSNIdEuBIMfh c5RRkbTjnQvM3NzRfCVH+323dAq4VUhBbSOg9FHEr6bfdub6dfi++76GL GAA4cwzYXZs+KSaSnH3vQ/HMVjNB2szJGxFbm0MOK2pKqUQnhWmxyfs7H g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: CS2Sln/kRySX40SxKyTxsg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: y3ySkZGuTdGzyY6ubVA/PQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11222"; a="31016497" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="31016497" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Oct 2024 08:54:11 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XJoT6DYaSx2ZhvHRDDVN2A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: hi0fRxUkT9aYvCiN1D5MRA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="81997792" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2024 08:54:08 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1szeRR-000DUV-33; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:54:05 +0000 Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 23:53:16 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Richard Weinberger , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, andersson@kernel.org, upstream+rproc@sigma-star.at, Richard Weinberger , ohad@wizery.com, s-anna@ti.com, t-kristo@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] rpmsg_ns: Work around TI non-standard message Message-ID: <202410122348.irTWFe4S-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241011123922.23135-1-richard@nod.at> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241011123922.23135-1-richard@nod.at> Hi Richard, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on remoteproc/rpmsg-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.12-rc2 next-20241011] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Richard-Weinberger/rpmsg_ns-Work-around-TI-non-standard-message/20241011-204122 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/remoteproc/linux.git rpmsg-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241011123922.23135-1-richard%40nod.at patch subject: [PATCH] rpmsg_ns: Work around TI non-standard message config: x86_64-randconfig-121-20241012 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241012/202410122348.irTWFe4S-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241012/202410122348.irTWFe4S-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410122348.irTWFe4S-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c:55:25: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected restricted __rpmsg32 [assigned] [usertype] ns_addr @@ got unsigned int [usertype] addr @@ drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c:55:25: sparse: expected restricted __rpmsg32 [assigned] [usertype] ns_addr drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c:55:25: sparse: got unsigned int [usertype] addr >> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c:56:26: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected restricted __rpmsg32 [assigned] [usertype] ns_flags @@ got unsigned int [usertype] flags @@ drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c:56:26: sparse: expected restricted __rpmsg32 [assigned] [usertype] ns_flags drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c:56:26: sparse: got unsigned int [usertype] flags vim +55 drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c 45 46 if (len == sizeof(struct rpmsg_ns_msg)) { 47 struct rpmsg_ns_msg *msg = data; 48 49 ns_addr = msg->addr; 50 ns_flags = msg->flags; 51 ns_name = msg->name; 52 } else if (len == sizeof(struct __rpmsg_ns_msg_ti)) { 53 struct __rpmsg_ns_msg_ti *msg = data; 54 > 55 ns_addr = msg->addr; > 56 ns_flags = msg->flags; 57 ns_name = msg->name; 58 dev_warn(dev, "non-standard ns msg found\n"); 59 } else { 60 dev_err(dev, "malformed ns msg (%d)\n", len); 61 return -EINVAL; 62 } 63 64 /* don't trust the remote processor for null terminating the name */ 65 ns_name[RPMSG_NAME_SIZE - 1] = '\0'; 66 67 strscpy_pad(chinfo.name, ns_name, sizeof(chinfo.name)); 68 chinfo.src = RPMSG_ADDR_ANY; 69 chinfo.dst = rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, ns_addr); 70 71 dev_info(dev, "%sing channel %s addr 0x%x\n", 72 rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, ns_flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY ? 73 "destroy" : "creat", ns_name, chinfo.dst); 74 75 if (rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, ns_flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY) { 76 ret = rpmsg_release_channel(rpdev, &chinfo); 77 if (ret) 78 dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_destroy_channel failed: %d\n", ret); 79 } else { 80 newch = rpmsg_create_channel(rpdev, &chinfo); 81 if (!newch) 82 dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_create_channel failed\n"); 83 } 84 85 return 0; 86 } 87 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki