From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 986FE1C9B87; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728980525; cv=none; b=ZBSgAFS24tsYQIXvYT0K7KHMqmxWTSxLUEEc7Ac02wKUvcFNEE3SpN9ndP5fdlwofQuVnUdEPVjrjubSn3ZU/Ratoso20bYFKQfb+mHEOM63Nk5e9XRU4/tFcvgOBta8+HX0O59fb/DLheUK1K7G3/UwNYwyv9ecTjn3kTfp0ok= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728980525; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZyMJa6Jwuka2TO342RkLAb6dF7EpFvQESmiJFUd2SSY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oyx9/V5yr/C6AjZZiiFKiHZpSBALJBe3iDf66DWGV3JlVqTkThZ49RnyEd02XtS8zdvZ7mAls4qsrTmOWfn4ZRlsXIKdOS5nUvpQpp221idE2iLT5GrGxQ0QlHNFCgPuI8x6VIkW5Nqgb6I1dOK0HVJjlU67iYtKTqowz6ggtuE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=anUFVOvv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="anUFVOvv" Received: from pps.filterd (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 49F7PlOs027400; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:21:56 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=c5lhar7v4eLS49jskAhJTfiKUSi6Am BfPG1gKlXciwU=; b=anUFVOvvzBObet737suFF6+eMr94CEC/9Sqz5ahW4205AX EwkNqsEyF73bGMJwQl5p78s7HluYc7ZF9rTKACz3eAG/HtvzwQDUOAEV/dAHj7aH Gz/B+VKzY9GjviSfgbetNlxdVQRF93NFIAfiSrY2NrC3JP/692+b/eLKNTTCYXdu iBqVABhfIcN6FNEhGMFnCwoC1TrdeOzlvyUgDSQEO5ZE3p4kJEe8fKCxupAzpxnr wOcfZDhLAVLlV7cWfJ1R5sNwPPuJscXsm3M8/8FPQWcJ/B2hMcHNPkvf9SPlj2q6 9der7guBj0iBo28mqi8VZKz9ORQy43i0HdhsLNgQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 429m0588nk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:21:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0360083.ppops.net (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.0.8/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 49F8LtqZ015991; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:21:56 GMT Received: from ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5c.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.92]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 429m0588nc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:21:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 49F7gvOI027451; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:21:54 GMT Received: from smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.228]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4283txjsbe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:21:54 +0000 Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.106]) by smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 49F8LoqK19988858 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:21:50 GMT Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A276120043; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:21:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE2820040; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:21:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.152.212.60]) by smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:21:49 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 10:21:48 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: David Hildenbrand Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Thomas Huth , Cornelia Huck , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Xuan Zhuo , Eugenio =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= , Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] Documentation: s390-diag.rst: make diag500 a generic KVM hypercall Message-ID: <20241015082148.7641-B-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <20241014144622.876731-1-david@redhat.com> <20241014144622.876731-3-david@redhat.com> <20241014180410.10447-C-hca@linux.ibm.com> <78e8794a-d89f-4ded-b102-afc7cea20d1d@redhat.com> <20241015081212.7641-A-hca@linux.ibm.com> <8e39522c-2853-4d1f-b5ec-64fabcca968b@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8e39522c-2853-4d1f-b5ec-64fabcca968b@redhat.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 84a_QRz4QyxkwKqhc4fD72zEUsnc0y0v X-Proofpoint-GUID: oPIUMjN_VobXTVvYRnEV425WV2FcuVkA X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1051,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.62.30 definitions=2024-10-15_01,2024-10-11_01,2024-09-30_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=398 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2409260000 definitions=main-2410150052 On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 10:16:20AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 15.10.24 10:12, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 09:35:27PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 14.10.24 20:04, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > "If only there would be a query subcode available, so that the program > > check handling would not be necessary; but in particular my new subcode > > is not worth adding it" :) > > > > Anyway, I do not care too much. > > > > Okay, I see your point: it would allow for removing the program check > handling from the STORAGE LIMIT invocation. > > ... if only we wouldn't need the exact same program check handling for the > new query subfunction :P Yeah yeah, but I think you got that this might help in the future.