From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: Add a new remoteproc state RPROC_DEFUNCT
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 12:16:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202410161111.ZSy2XQxP-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241014203118.1580024-1-quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
Hi Mukesh,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on remoteproc/rproc-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.12-rc3 next-20241015]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mukesh-Ojha/remoteproc-Add-a-new-remoteproc-state-RPROC_DEFUNCT/20241015-043318
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/remoteproc/linux.git rproc-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014203118.1580024-1-quic_mojha%40quicinc.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: Add a new remoteproc state RPROC_DEFUNCT
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-003-20241016 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241016/202410161111.ZSy2XQxP-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241016/202410161111.ZSy2XQxP-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410161111.ZSy2XQxP-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:1843:18: warning: comparison between pointer and integer ('int (*)(struct rproc *, const struct firmware *)' and 'int') [-Wpointer-integer-compare]
1843 | if (rproc_start == RPROC_DEFUNCT || rproc->state != RPROC_CRASHED)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
vim +1843 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
1820
1821 /**
1822 * rproc_trigger_recovery() - recover a remoteproc
1823 * @rproc: the remote processor
1824 *
1825 * The recovery is done by resetting all the virtio devices, that way all the
1826 * rpmsg drivers will be reseted along with the remote processor making the
1827 * remoteproc functional again.
1828 *
1829 * This function can sleep, so it cannot be called from atomic context.
1830 *
1831 * Return: 0 on success or a negative value upon failure
1832 */
1833 int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
1834 {
1835 struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
1836 int ret;
1837
1838 ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
1839 if (ret)
1840 return ret;
1841
1842 /* State could have changed before we got the mutex */
> 1843 if (rproc_start == RPROC_DEFUNCT || rproc->state != RPROC_CRASHED)
1844 goto unlock_mutex;
1845
1846 dev_err(dev, "recovering %s\n", rproc->name);
1847
1848 if (rproc_has_feature(rproc, RPROC_FEAT_ATTACH_ON_RECOVERY))
1849 ret = rproc_attach_recovery(rproc);
1850 else
1851 ret = rproc_boot_recovery(rproc);
1852
1853 unlock_mutex:
1854 mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
1855 return ret;
1856 }
1857
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-16 4:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-14 20:31 [PATCH v2] remoteproc: Add a new remoteproc state RPROC_DEFUNCT Mukesh Ojha
2024-10-14 20:41 ` Mukesh Ojha
2024-10-16 3:55 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-16 4:16 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202410161111.ZSy2XQxP-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox