Re: [PATCH v2] staging: gpib: Remove unneeded semicolon.

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 03:39:14PM +0530, Rohit Chavan wrote:
> This patch cleans up the GPIB driver by removing unneeded semicolons.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Chavan <roheetchavan@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/gpib/tms9914/tms9914.c | 4 ++--
>  drivers/staging/gpib/tnt4882/mite.c    | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/tms9914/tms9914.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/tms9914/tms9914.c
> index aa2308cf5477..6d75294412d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gpib/tms9914/tms9914.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/tms9914/tms9914.c
> @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static int wait_for_read_byte(gpib_board_t *board, struct tms9914_priv *priv)
>  				     test_bit(TIMO_NUM, &board->status))) {
>  		pr_debug("gpib: pio read wait interrupted\n");
>  		return -ERESTARTSYS;
> -	};
> +	}
>  	if (test_bit(TIMO_NUM, &board->status))
>  		return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static inline uint8_t tms9914_read_data_in(gpib_board_t *board, struct tms9914_p
>  	default:
>  		pr_err("%s: bug! bad holdoff mode %i\n", __func__, priv->holdoff_mode);
>  		break;
> -	};
> +	}
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&board->spinlock, flags);
>  
>  	return data;
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/tnt4882/mite.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/tnt4882/mite.c
> index adb656a5eb2c..882cc4bc122e 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gpib/tnt4882/mite.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/tnt4882/mite.c
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ int mite_setup(struct mite_struct *mite)
>  	if (pci_request_regions(mite->pcidev, "mite")) {
>  		pr_err("mite: failed to request mite io regions.\n");
>  		return -EIO;
> -	};
> +	}
>  	addr = pci_resource_start(mite->pcidev, 0);
>  	mite->mite_phys_addr = addr;
>  	mite->mite_io_addr = ioremap(addr, pci_resource_len(mite->pcidev, 0));
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
  needs to be done here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot