* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.228-rc1 review
2024-10-21 10:25 [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.228-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-10-21 17:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-10-22 6:46 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-10-21 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 10/21/24 03:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.228 release.
> There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.228-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.228-rc1 review
2024-10-21 10:25 [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.228-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-10-21 17:46 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-10-22 6:46 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-10-22 9:59 ` Pavel Machek
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-10-22 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 16:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.228 release.
> There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.228-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.228-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 11656f6fe2df8ad7262fe635fd9a53f66bb23102
* git describe: v5.10.227-53-g11656f6fe2df
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.227-53-g11656f6fe2df
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.226-519-g5807510dd577)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.226-519-g5807510dd577)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.226-519-g5807510dd577)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.226-519-g5807510dd577)
## Test result summary
total: 59318, pass: 43619, fail: 1978, skip: 13654, xfail: 67
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 102 total, 102 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 29 total, 29 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.228-rc1 review
2024-10-21 10:25 [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.228-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-10-21 17:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-10-22 6:46 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-10-22 9:59 ` Pavel Machek
2024-10-22 13:00 ` Mark Brown
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-10-22 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 641 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.228 release.
> There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.228-rc1 review
2024-10-21 10:25 [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.228-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 9:59 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-10-22 13:00 ` Mark Brown
2024-10-22 17:55 ` Jon Hunter
2024-10-23 7:27 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2024-10-22 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 346 bytes --]
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 12:25:21PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.228 release.
> There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.228-rc1 review
2024-10-21 10:25 [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.228-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 13:00 ` Mark Brown
@ 2024-10-22 17:55 ` Jon Hunter
2024-10-23 7:27 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-10-22 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:25:21 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.228 release.
> There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.228-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
67 tests: 67 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.228-rc1-g11656f6fe2df
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.228-rc1 review
2024-10-21 10:25 [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.228-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 17:55 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-10-23 7:27 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum @ 2024-10-23 7:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: Usama.Anjum, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 10/21/24 3:25 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.228 release.
> There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.228-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------
Hi,
Please find the KernelCI report below :-
OVERVIEW
Builds: 24 passed, 0 failed
Boot tests: 53 passed, 1 failed
CI systems: maestro
REVISION
Commit
name:
hash: 11656f6fe2df8ad7262fe635fd9a53f66bb23102
Checked out from
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
BUILDS
No new build failures found
BOOT TESTS
Failures
- i386 (defconfig)
Error detail: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in ./include/linux/log2.h:57:13
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000
Build error: https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/test/test?var-datasource=edquppk2ghfcwc&var-origin=maestro&var-build_architecture=All&var-build_config_name=All&var-id=maestro:671648503eaa4b46ca68a35c&orgId=1
See complete and up-to-date report at:
https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/revision/revision?orgId=1&var-datasource=edquppk2ghfcwc&var-git_commit_hash=11656f6fe2df8ad7262fe635fd9a53f66bb23102&var-patchset_hash=&var-origin=maestro&var-build_architecture=All&var-build_config_name=All&var-test_path=boot
Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Thanks,
KernelCI team
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread