The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Cc: Zicheng Qu <quzicheng@huawei.com>,
	lars@metafoo.de, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tanghui20@huawei.com,
	zhangqiao22@huawei.com, judy.chenhui@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: fix infinite loop for gain_to_scaletables()
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 21:49:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241031214957.609e21c0@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5dae4924-5c07-48b6-a818-809cd4dd1c80@gmail.com>

On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 09:25:16 +0200
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks again Zicheng!
> 
> On 31/10/2024 03:46, Zicheng Qu wrote:
> > In iio_gts_build_avail_time_table(), it is checked that gts->num_itime is
> > non-zero, but gts->num_itime is not checked in gain_to_scaletables(). The
> > variable time_idx is initialized as gts->num_itime - 1. This implies that
> > time_idx might initially be set to -1 (0 - 1 = -1). Consequently, using
> > while (time_idx--) could lead to an infinite loop.
> > 
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.6+
> > Fixes: 38416c28e168 ("iio: light: Add gain-time-scale helpers")
> > Signed-off-by: Zicheng Qu <quzicheng@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/iio/industrialio-gts-helper.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-gts-helper.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-gts-helper.c
> > index 59d7615c0f56..f3acd392f4fc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-gts-helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-gts-helper.c
> > @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static int gain_to_scaletables(struct iio_gts *gts, int **gains, int **scales)
> >   	memcpy(all_gains, gains[time_idx], gain_bytes);
> >   	new_idx = gts->num_hwgain;
> >   
> > -	while (time_idx--) {
> > +	while (time_idx-- > 0) {
> >   		for (j = 0; j < gts->num_hwgain; j++) {
> >   			int candidate = gains[time_idx][j];
> >   			int chk;  
> 
> This, too, brings the question if supporting 0 times is worth.
> 
> At least this shows that it'd be nice to cover the "only times, no 
> hw-gains" and "no times, only hw-gains" cases in the Kunit tests...
> 
> Anyways - Thanks!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Applied

> 
> Yours,
> 	-- Matti
> 
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2024-10-31 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-31  1:46 [PATCH] iio: fix infinite loop for gain_to_scaletables() Zicheng Qu
2024-10-31  7:25 ` Matti Vaittinen
2024-10-31 21:49   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241031214957.609e21c0@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=judy.chenhui@huawei.com \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
    --cc=quzicheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=tanghui20@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangqiao22@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox