The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, surenb@google.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/4] sched: Don't account irq time if sched_clock_irqtime is disabled
Date: Fri,  1 Nov 2024 11:17:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241101031750.1471-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241101031750.1471-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>

sched_clock_irqtime may be disabled due to the clock source, in which case
IRQ time should not be accounted. Let's add a conditional check to avoid
unnecessary logic.

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index dbfb5717d6af..06a06f0897c3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -740,29 +740,31 @@ static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
 	s64 __maybe_unused steal = 0, irq_delta = 0;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
-	irq_delta = irq_time_read(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->prev_irq_time;
+	if (static_branch_likely(&sched_clock_irqtime)) {
+		irq_delta = irq_time_read(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->prev_irq_time;
 
-	/*
-	 * Since irq_time is only updated on {soft,}irq_exit, we might run into
-	 * this case when a previous update_rq_clock() happened inside a
-	 * {soft,}IRQ region.
-	 *
-	 * When this happens, we stop ->clock_task and only update the
-	 * prev_irq_time stamp to account for the part that fit, so that a next
-	 * update will consume the rest. This ensures ->clock_task is
-	 * monotonic.
-	 *
-	 * It does however cause some slight miss-attribution of {soft,}IRQ
-	 * time, a more accurate solution would be to update the irq_time using
-	 * the current rq->clock timestamp, except that would require using
-	 * atomic ops.
-	 */
-	if (irq_delta > delta)
-		irq_delta = delta;
+		/*
+		 * Since irq_time is only updated on {soft,}irq_exit, we might run into
+		 * this case when a previous update_rq_clock() happened inside a
+		 * {soft,}IRQ region.
+		 *
+		 * When this happens, we stop ->clock_task and only update the
+		 * prev_irq_time stamp to account for the part that fit, so that a next
+		 * update will consume the rest. This ensures ->clock_task is
+		 * monotonic.
+		 *
+		 * It does however cause some slight miss-attribution of {soft,}IRQ
+		 * time, a more accurate solution would be to update the irq_time using
+		 * the current rq->clock timestamp, except that would require using
+		 * atomic ops.
+		 */
+		if (irq_delta > delta)
+			irq_delta = delta;
 
-	rq->prev_irq_time += irq_delta;
-	delta -= irq_delta;
-	delayacct_irq(rq->curr, irq_delta);
+		rq->prev_irq_time += irq_delta;
+		delta -= irq_delta;
+		delayacct_irq(rq->curr, irq_delta);
+	}
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING
 	if (static_key_false((&paravirt_steal_rq_enabled))) {
-- 
2.43.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-01  3:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-01  3:17 [PATCH v4 0/4] sched: Fix irq accounting for CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING Yafang Shao
2024-11-01  3:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] sched: Define sched_clock_irqtime as static key Yafang Shao
2024-11-01 10:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-01 11:55     ` Yafang Shao
2024-11-01  3:17 ` Yafang Shao [this message]
2024-11-01  3:17 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] sched, psi: Don't account irq time if sched_clock_irqtime is disabled Yafang Shao
2024-11-01  3:17 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] sched: Fix cgroup irq accounting for CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING Yafang Shao
2024-11-01 10:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-01 12:04     ` Yafang Shao
2024-11-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] sched: Fix " Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-01 11:54   ` Yafang Shao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241101031750.1471-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox