From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc changes for v6.13
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 23:01:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241101220128.GA15188@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49905050-8bea-498a-9a69-bbf7e00f30c8@t-8ch.de>
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 09:40:34PM +0000, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Maybe we could just enclose the test with:
> >
> > #if !defined(__GLIBC__) || __GLIBC__ > 2 || __GLIBC_MINOR__ >= 40
> > ...
> > #endif
>
> This will mess up the test case numbers.
> The test is actually only running on nolibc anyways, so we could also
> stub out strlcat() with a dummy inline function.
OK.
> > > For better architecture coverage I would recommend ./run-tests.sh over
> > > "make run/user". Speaking about this I remember the discussion from the
> > > 6.12 PR where Willy proposed an improved run-tests.sh error message.
> > > It seems he didn't push it as a commit, so let's add keep it in mind for
> > > next cycle.
> >
> > Oups, I vaguely remember proposing a trivial patch in an e-mail a while
> > ago but I don't even remember what it was about. My mind is totally taken
> > by the upcoming haproxy release these days :-/
>
> It's at https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZtlQbpgpn9OQOPyI@1wt.eu/
> No worries, I'll pick it up after 6.13-rc1.
Ah, I found it, it reminded me something, because usually I forget about
patches once I commit them! I had pushed it to the next branch by then:
commit 6fc1d365c7394790cf7073a4acfcbf7fe4e8eff9 (HEAD -> 20240908-nolibc-next, korg-nolibc-git/next)
Author: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Sun Sep 8 12:00:12 2024 +0200
selftests/nolibc: run-tests.sh: detect missing toolchain
The script tries to resolve the path to the current toolchain using
realpath, which fails in case it's not installed, and since it's run
under -e, it doesn't have the opportunity to display a help message.
Let's detect the absence of the required toolchain before running that
command and provide a friendlier message when this happens.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZtlQbpgpn9OQOPyI@1wt.eu/
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Seems like we messed up with a forced push to next at some point :-)
I rebased it on the current next and pushed it again:
648da1b274cf85fff5fe60914ae6a402013f456c
Cheers,
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-01 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <ba23217d-5eaf-4146-8ed7-27289cece364@t-8ch.de>
2024-11-01 14:22 ` [GIT PULL] nolibc changes for v6.13 Thomas Weißschuh
2024-11-01 20:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-11-01 21:23 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-11-01 21:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2024-11-01 21:40 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-11-01 22:01 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2024-11-01 22:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-11-17 18:40 Paul E. McKenney
2024-11-19 19:06 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241101220128.GA15188@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox