From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C9B71B4F2D; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 16:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730479676; cv=none; b=Efa5zg/gQDlwW2EIMKEI6quipHKuMrAT/dTgR4/1oc6O+r0a3eZaXdpJ9nfXJ9NtTZiwqnAYtExGQiwcGOs3jcQcxCRVSQTcz7vH46yHT/mxEl/ze5N9AD/UhhkiMnYv2WrX9vlVLJP2JKIe0KUFxVhPidp1O1GckAfRWcUlShs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730479676; c=relaxed/simple; bh=c30YaQPddMCtY3eMn/oxC9HA5IhddbuJLVvAjHWP6PU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OrZPZsMpD8gbr2UGGO7/mhH2+KqaEWbXAEb2SLk5jamKJo/Bg4Xck7QAHbSYDK/dU7WXmC3TitV1h8zvDzZO99wcQ3RbXFRmacH79eBjIU0sLnlOYHHY6hsrB2SOEr814sSgjCY/nsnK0a179P5oosNMybN2s6QE2KPtGyiZjso= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=IQXipQIm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="IQXipQIm" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1730479674; x=1762015674; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=c30YaQPddMCtY3eMn/oxC9HA5IhddbuJLVvAjHWP6PU=; b=IQXipQIm8wRZeXYGQ9NUjZlCSuNadObM+H7i5akZrqc4SUBhG8U5Hj3Q bwjiGVlu1WRiwE7Y2JWLANOkjmCzLIekS/hQotJTzugNIEpFuGi+X2Sdi FFboV1v/QHkpEDprrNCXQkW8cK1xoxrzajDOYL7gGk45qEsz9F+NboA1L yma46JDxzg6ZKpVxTxb2tW7lw4kaW7Ah7it4wHPTLjyVjBdipd70x74+W 1EvVkLHa/uYWZZYORNkFgk2jheKTZKxx5bBf4kIE3icWy+IOvR61bUbFh 9owsdrk+4yttFUzNAMWWyXYZSBIr4eG8zYTuaTJ0AAfGevuS2jVts2Ekk Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +Cvs7WFaQh+1xP+jOLuwsg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RfVUhAvoSX6tMo+Bb2h4UQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11243"; a="17879852" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,250,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="17879852" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Nov 2024 09:47:54 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Wb4b81CGR52YZm+RfTJnng== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9VLLpQbcQImSyWUjk/L+ow== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,250,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="82892635" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2024 09:47:49 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1t6uoN-000hmF-0u; Fri, 01 Nov 2024 16:47:47 +0000 Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 00:47:32 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Philo Lu , netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, antony.antony@secunet.com, steffen.klassert@secunet.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dust.li@linux.alibaba.com, jakub@cloudflare.com, fred.cc@alibaba-inc.com, yubing.qiuyubing@alibaba-inc.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 4/4] ipv6/udp: Add 4-tuple hash for connected socket Message-ID: <202411020025.8DrAkT2l-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241031124550.20227-5-lulie@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241031124550.20227-5-lulie@linux.alibaba.com> Hi Philo, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on net-next/main] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Philo-Lu/net-udp-Add-a-new-struct-for-hash2-slot/20241031-204729 base: net-next/main patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241031124550.20227-5-lulie%40linux.alibaba.com patch subject: [PATCH v6 net-next 4/4] ipv6/udp: Add 4-tuple hash for connected socket config: i386-randconfig-141-20241101 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241102/202411020025.8DrAkT2l-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241102/202411020025.8DrAkT2l-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411020025.8DrAkT2l-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): net/ipv6/udp.c: In function 'udp_v6_rehash': >> net/ipv6/udp.c:116:29: error: implicit declaration of function 'udp_ehashfn'; did you mean 'udp6_ehashfn'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 116 | new_hash4 = udp_ehashfn(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_rcv_saddr, sk->sk_num, | ^~~~~~~~~~~ | udp6_ehashfn cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +116 net/ipv6/udp.c 107 108 void udp_v6_rehash(struct sock *sk) 109 { 110 u16 new_hash = ipv6_portaddr_hash(sock_net(sk), 111 &sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr, 112 inet_sk(sk)->inet_num); 113 u16 new_hash4; 114 115 if (ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr)) { > 116 new_hash4 = udp_ehashfn(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_rcv_saddr, sk->sk_num, 117 sk->sk_daddr, sk->sk_dport); 118 } else { 119 new_hash4 = udp6_ehashfn(sock_net(sk), &sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr, sk->sk_num, 120 &sk->sk_v6_daddr, sk->sk_dport); 121 } 122 123 udp_lib_rehash(sk, new_hash, new_hash4); 124 } 125 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki