[for-next][PATCH 0/3] tracing: Updates for 6.13

[for-next][PATCH 0/3] tracing: Updates for 6.13

[Steven Rostedt]

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace.git
trace/for-next

Head SHA1: 24507ce81eaf0c34d91f3d1acaa73ee2f796190a


Andrii Nakryiko (3):
      bpf: put bpf_link's program when link is safe to be deallocated
      bpf: decouple BPF link/attach hook and BPF program sleepable semantics
      bpf: ensure RCU Tasks Trace GP for sleepable raw tracepoint BPF links

----
 include/linux/bpf.h  | 20 ++++++++++++++--
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

[for-next][PATCH 1/3] bpf: put bpf_links program when link is safe to be deallocated

[Steven Rostedt]

From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

In general, BPF link's underlying BPF program should be considered to be
reachable through attach hook -> link -> prog chain, and, pessimistically,
we have to assume that as long as link's memory is not safe to free,
attach hook's code might hold a pointer to BPF program and use it.

As such, it's not (generally) correct to put link's program early before
waiting for RCU GPs to go through. More eager bpf_prog_put() that we
currently do is mostly correct due to BPF program's release code doing
similar RCU GP waiting, but as will be shown in the following patches,
BPF program can be non-sleepable (and, thus, reliant on only "classic"
RCU GP), while BPF link's attach hook can have sleepable semantics and
needs to be protected by RCU Tasks Trace, and for such cases BPF link
has to go through RCU Tasks Trace + "classic" RCU GPs before being
deallocated. And so, if we put BPF program early, we might free BPF
program before we free BPF link, leading to use-after-free situation.

So, this patch defers bpf_prog_put() until we are ready to perform
bpf_link's deallocation. At worst, this delays BPF program freeing by
one extra RCU GP, but that seems completely acceptable. Alternatively,
we'd need more elaborate ways to determine BPF hook, BPF link, and BPF
program lifetimes, and how they relate to each other, which seems like
an unnecessary complication.

Note, for most BPF links we still will perform eager bpf_prog_put() and
link dealloc, so for those BPF links there are no observable changes
whatsoever. Only BPF links that use deferred dealloc might notice
slightly delayed freeing of BPF programs.

Also, to reduce code and logic duplication, extract program put + link
dealloc logic into bpf_link_dealloc() helper.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241101181754.782341-1-andrii@kernel.org
Tested-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index a8f1808a1ca5..aa7246a399f3 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -2976,12 +2976,24 @@ void bpf_link_inc(struct bpf_link *link)
 	atomic64_inc(&link->refcnt);
 }
 
+static void bpf_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+	/* now that we know that bpf_link itself can't be reached, put underlying BPF program */
+	if (link->prog)
+		bpf_prog_put(link->prog);
+
+	/* free bpf_link and its containing memory */
+	if (link->ops->dealloc_deferred)
+		link->ops->dealloc_deferred(link);
+	else
+		link->ops->dealloc(link);
+}
+
 static void bpf_link_defer_dealloc_rcu_gp(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 {
 	struct bpf_link *link = container_of(rcu, struct bpf_link, rcu);
 
-	/* free bpf_link and its containing memory */
-	link->ops->dealloc_deferred(link);
+	bpf_link_dealloc(link);
 }
 
 static void bpf_link_defer_dealloc_mult_rcu_gp(struct rcu_head *rcu)
@@ -3003,7 +3015,6 @@ static void bpf_link_free(struct bpf_link *link)
 		sleepable = link->prog->sleepable;
 		/* detach BPF program, clean up used resources */
 		ops->release(link);
-		bpf_prog_put(link->prog);
 	}
 	if (ops->dealloc_deferred) {
 		/* schedule BPF link deallocation; if underlying BPF program
@@ -3014,8 +3025,9 @@ static void bpf_link_free(struct bpf_link *link)
 			call_rcu_tasks_trace(&link->rcu, bpf_link_defer_dealloc_mult_rcu_gp);
 		else
 			call_rcu(&link->rcu, bpf_link_defer_dealloc_rcu_gp);
-	} else if (ops->dealloc)
-		ops->dealloc(link);
+	} else if (ops->dealloc) {
+		bpf_link_dealloc(link);
+	}
 }
 
 static void bpf_link_put_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
-- 
2.45.2

[for-next][PATCH 2/3] bpf: decouple BPF link/attach hook and BPF program sleepable semantics

[Steven Rostedt]

From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

BPF link's lifecycle protection scheme depends on both BPF hook and BPF
program. If *either* of those require RCU Tasks Trace GP, then we need
to go through a chain of GPs before putting BPF program refcount and
deallocating BPF link memory.

This patch adds bpf_link-specific sleepable flag, which can be set to
true even if underlying BPF program is not sleepable itself. If either
link->sleepable or link->prog->sleepable is true, we'll go through
a chain of RCU Tasks Trace GP and RCU GP before putting BPF program and
freeing memory.

This will be used to protect BPF link for sleepable (faultable) raw
tracepoints in the next patch.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241101181754.782341-2-andrii@kernel.org
Tested-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h  | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 19d8ca8ac960..e7236facadd4 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1598,6 +1598,11 @@ struct bpf_link {
 	enum bpf_link_type type;
 	const struct bpf_link_ops *ops;
 	struct bpf_prog *prog;
+	/* whether BPF link itself has "sleepable" semantics, which can differ
+	 * from underlying BPF program having a "sleepable" semantics, as BPF
+	 * link's semantics is determined by target attach hook
+	 */
+	bool sleepable;
 	/* rcu is used before freeing, work can be used to schedule that
 	 * RCU-based freeing before that, so they never overlap
 	 */
@@ -1614,8 +1619,10 @@ struct bpf_link_ops {
 	 */
 	void (*dealloc)(struct bpf_link *link);
 	/* deallocate link resources callback, called after RCU grace period;
-	 * if underlying BPF program is sleepable we go through tasks trace
-	 * RCU GP and then "classic" RCU GP
+	 * if either the underlying BPF program is sleepable or BPF link's
+	 * target hook is sleepable, we'll go through tasks trace RCU GP and
+	 * then "classic" RCU GP; this need for chaining tasks trace and
+	 * classic RCU GPs is designated by setting bpf_link->sleepable flag
 	 */
 	void (*dealloc_deferred)(struct bpf_link *link);
 	int (*detach)(struct bpf_link *link);
@@ -2362,6 +2369,9 @@ int bpf_prog_new_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog);
 
 void bpf_link_init(struct bpf_link *link, enum bpf_link_type type,
 		   const struct bpf_link_ops *ops, struct bpf_prog *prog);
+void bpf_link_init_sleepable(struct bpf_link *link, enum bpf_link_type type,
+			     const struct bpf_link_ops *ops, struct bpf_prog *prog,
+			     bool sleepable);
 int bpf_link_prime(struct bpf_link *link, struct bpf_link_primer *primer);
 int bpf_link_settle(struct bpf_link_primer *primer);
 void bpf_link_cleanup(struct bpf_link_primer *primer);
@@ -2717,6 +2727,12 @@ static inline void bpf_link_init(struct bpf_link *link, enum bpf_link_type type,
 {
 }
 
+static inline void bpf_link_init_sleepable(struct bpf_link *link, enum bpf_link_type type,
+					   const struct bpf_link_ops *ops, struct bpf_prog *prog,
+					   bool sleepable)
+{
+}
+
 static inline int bpf_link_prime(struct bpf_link *link,
 				 struct bpf_link_primer *primer)
 {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index aa7246a399f3..0f5540627911 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -2933,17 +2933,33 @@ static int bpf_obj_get(const union bpf_attr *attr)
 				attr->file_flags);
 }
 
-void bpf_link_init(struct bpf_link *link, enum bpf_link_type type,
-		   const struct bpf_link_ops *ops, struct bpf_prog *prog)
+/* bpf_link_init_sleepable() allows to specify whether BPF link itself has
+ * "sleepable" semantics, which normally would mean that BPF link's attach
+ * hook can dereference link or link's underlying program for some time after
+ * detachment due to RCU Tasks Trace-based lifetime protection scheme.
+ * BPF program itself can be non-sleepable, yet, because it's transitively
+ * reachable through BPF link, its freeing has to be delayed until after RCU
+ * Tasks Trace GP.
+ */
+void bpf_link_init_sleepable(struct bpf_link *link, enum bpf_link_type type,
+			     const struct bpf_link_ops *ops, struct bpf_prog *prog,
+			     bool sleepable)
 {
 	WARN_ON(ops->dealloc && ops->dealloc_deferred);
 	atomic64_set(&link->refcnt, 1);
 	link->type = type;
+	link->sleepable = sleepable;
 	link->id = 0;
 	link->ops = ops;
 	link->prog = prog;
 }
 
+void bpf_link_init(struct bpf_link *link, enum bpf_link_type type,
+		   const struct bpf_link_ops *ops, struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	bpf_link_init_sleepable(link, type, ops, prog, false);
+}
+
 static void bpf_link_free_id(int id)
 {
 	if (!id)
@@ -3008,20 +3024,21 @@ static void bpf_link_defer_dealloc_mult_rcu_gp(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 static void bpf_link_free(struct bpf_link *link)
 {
 	const struct bpf_link_ops *ops = link->ops;
-	bool sleepable = false;
 
 	bpf_link_free_id(link->id);
-	if (link->prog) {
-		sleepable = link->prog->sleepable;
-		/* detach BPF program, clean up used resources */
+	/* detach BPF program, clean up used resources */
+	if (link->prog)
 		ops->release(link);
-	}
 	if (ops->dealloc_deferred) {
-		/* schedule BPF link deallocation; if underlying BPF program
-		 * is sleepable, we need to first wait for RCU tasks trace
-		 * sync, then go through "classic" RCU grace period
+		/* Schedule BPF link deallocation, which will only then
+		 * trigger putting BPF program refcount.
+		 * If underlying BPF program is sleepable or BPF link's target
+		 * attach hookpoint is sleepable or otherwise requires RCU GPs
+		 * to ensure link and its underlying BPF program is not
+		 * reachable anymore, we need to first wait for RCU tasks
+		 * trace sync, and then go through "classic" RCU grace period
 		 */
-		if (sleepable)
+		if (link->sleepable || (link->prog && link->prog->sleepable))
 			call_rcu_tasks_trace(&link->rcu, bpf_link_defer_dealloc_mult_rcu_gp);
 		else
 			call_rcu(&link->rcu, bpf_link_defer_dealloc_rcu_gp);
-- 
2.45.2

[for-next][PATCH 3/3] bpf: ensure RCU Tasks Trace GP for sleepable raw tracepoint BPF links

[Steven Rostedt]

From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

Now that kernel supports sleepable tracepoints, the fact that
bpf_probe_unregister() is asynchronous, i.e., that it doesn't wait for
any in-flight tracepoints to conclude before returning, we now need to
delay BPF raw tp link's deallocation and bpf_prog_put() of its
underlying BPF program (regardless of program's own sleepable semantics)
until after full RCU Tasks Trace GP. With that GP over, we'll have
a guarantee that no tracepoint can reach BPF link and thus its BPF program.

We use newly added tracepoint_is_faultable() check to know when this RCU
Tasks Trace GP is necessary and utilize BPF link's own sleepable flag
passed through bpf_link_init_sleepable() initializer.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241101181754.782341-3-andrii@kernel.org
Tested-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
Reported-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
Fixes: a363d27cdbc2 ("tracing: Allow system call tracepoints to handle page faults")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 0f5540627911..db2a987504b2 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 #include <linux/rcupdate_trace.h>
 #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
 #include <linux/trace_events.h>
+#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
 
 #include <net/netfilter/nf_bpf_link.h>
 #include <net/netkit.h>
@@ -3845,8 +3846,9 @@ static int bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out_put_btp;
 	}
-	bpf_link_init(&link->link, BPF_LINK_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT,
-		      &bpf_raw_tp_link_lops, prog);
+	bpf_link_init_sleepable(&link->link, BPF_LINK_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT,
+				&bpf_raw_tp_link_lops, prog,
+				tracepoint_is_faultable(btp->tp));
 	link->btp = btp;
 	link->cookie = cookie;
 
-- 
2.45.2