public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/19] iommu/vt-d: Remove domain_update_iommu_cap()
Date: Mon,  4 Nov 2024 09:40:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241104014040.106100-5-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241104014040.106100-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

The attributes of a paging domain are initialized during the allocation
process, and any attempt to attach a domain that is not compatible will
result in a failure. Therefore, there is no need to update the domain
attributes at the time of domain attachment.

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241021085125.192333-5-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 83 -------------------------------------
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h |  1 -
 2 files changed, 84 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index 0fca84ac6794..d148274e7135 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -352,36 +352,6 @@ static bool iommu_paging_structure_coherency(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
 			ecap_smpwc(iommu->ecap) : ecap_coherent(iommu->ecap);
 }
 
-static void domain_update_iommu_coherency(struct dmar_domain *domain)
-{
-	struct iommu_domain_info *info;
-	struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd;
-	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
-	bool found = false;
-	unsigned long i;
-
-	domain->iommu_coherency = true;
-	xa_for_each(&domain->iommu_array, i, info) {
-		found = true;
-		if (!iommu_paging_structure_coherency(info->iommu)) {
-			domain->iommu_coherency = false;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-	if (found)
-		return;
-
-	/* No hardware attached; use lowest common denominator */
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
-		if (!iommu_paging_structure_coherency(iommu)) {
-			domain->iommu_coherency = false;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-}
-
 static int domain_update_iommu_superpage(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 					 struct intel_iommu *skip)
 {
@@ -412,29 +382,6 @@ static int domain_update_iommu_superpage(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 	return fls(mask);
 }
 
-static int domain_update_device_node(struct dmar_domain *domain)
-{
-	struct device_domain_info *info;
-	int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags);
-	list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) {
-		/*
-		 * There could possibly be multiple device numa nodes as devices
-		 * within the same domain may sit behind different IOMMUs. There
-		 * isn't perfect answer in such situation, so we select first
-		 * come first served policy.
-		 */
-		nid = dev_to_node(info->dev);
-		if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
-			break;
-	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags);
-
-	return nid;
-}
-
 /* Return the super pagesize bitmap if supported. */
 static unsigned long domain_super_pgsize_bitmap(struct dmar_domain *domain)
 {
@@ -452,34 +399,6 @@ static unsigned long domain_super_pgsize_bitmap(struct dmar_domain *domain)
 	return bitmap;
 }
 
-/* Some capabilities may be different across iommus */
-void domain_update_iommu_cap(struct dmar_domain *domain)
-{
-	domain_update_iommu_coherency(domain);
-	domain->iommu_superpage = domain_update_iommu_superpage(domain, NULL);
-
-	/*
-	 * If RHSA is missing, we should default to the device numa domain
-	 * as fall back.
-	 */
-	if (domain->nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
-		domain->nid = domain_update_device_node(domain);
-
-	/*
-	 * First-level translation restricts the input-address to a
-	 * canonical address (i.e., address bits 63:N have the same
-	 * value as address bit [N-1], where N is 48-bits with 4-level
-	 * paging and 57-bits with 5-level paging). Hence, skip bit
-	 * [N-1].
-	 */
-	if (domain->use_first_level)
-		domain->domain.geometry.aperture_end = __DOMAIN_MAX_ADDR(domain->gaw - 1);
-	else
-		domain->domain.geometry.aperture_end = __DOMAIN_MAX_ADDR(domain->gaw);
-
-	domain->domain.pgsize_bitmap |= domain_super_pgsize_bitmap(domain);
-}
-
 struct context_entry *iommu_context_addr(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u8 bus,
 					 u8 devfn, int alloc)
 {
@@ -1493,7 +1412,6 @@ int domain_attach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *iommu)
 		ret = xa_err(curr) ? : -EBUSY;
 		goto err_clear;
 	}
-	domain_update_iommu_cap(domain);
 
 	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
 	return 0;
@@ -1519,7 +1437,6 @@ void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *iommu)
 		clear_bit(info->did, iommu->domain_ids);
 		xa_erase(&domain->iommu_array, iommu->seq_id);
 		domain->nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
-		domain_update_iommu_cap(domain);
 		kfree(info);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
index b1928ca3aaa8..f9fba9a26dac 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
@@ -1231,7 +1231,6 @@ int domain_attach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *iommu);
 void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *iommu);
 void device_block_translation(struct device *dev);
 int paging_domain_compatible(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev);
-void domain_update_iommu_cap(struct dmar_domain *domain);
 
 int dmar_ir_support(void);
 
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-04  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-04  1:40 [PATCH 00/19] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for v6.13 Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 01/19] iommu/vt-d: Add domain_alloc_paging support Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 02/19] iommu/vt-d: Remove unused domain_alloc callback Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 03/19] iommu/vt-d: Enhance compatibility check for paging domain attach Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 05/19] iommu/vt-d: Remove domain_update_iommu_superpage() Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 06/19] iommu/vt-d: Refactor first_level_by_default() Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 07/19] iommu/vt-d: Refine intel_iommu_domain_alloc_user() Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 08/19] iommu/vt-d: Use PCI_DEVID() macro Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 09/19] iommu/vt-d: Increase buffer size for device name Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 10/19] iommu/vt-d: Remove unused dmar_msi_read Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 11/19] iommu/vt-d: Drop s1_pgtbl from dmar_domain Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 12/19] iommu/vt-d: Fix checks and print in dmar_fault_dump_ptes() Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 13/19] iommu/vt-d: Fix checks and print in pgtable_walk() Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 14/19] iommu/vt-d: Separate page request queue from SVM Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 15/19] iommu/vt-d: Remove the pasid present check in prq_event_thread Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 16/19] iommu/vt-d: Move IOMMU_IOPF into INTEL_IOMMU Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 17/19] iommufd: Enable PRI when doing the iommufd_hwpt_alloc Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 18/19] iommu/vt-d: Drop pasid requirement for prq initialization Lu Baolu
2024-11-04  1:40 ` [PATCH 19/19] iommu/vt-d: Drain PRQs when domain removed from RID Lu Baolu
2024-11-05 12:33 ` [PATCH 00/19] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for v6.13 Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241104014040.106100-5-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox