From: Jennifer Berringer <jberring@redhat.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Jennifer Berringer <jberring@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] nvmem: core: improve range check for nvmem_cell_write()
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 10:23:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241104152312.3813601-2-jberring@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241104152312.3813601-1-jberring@redhat.com>
When __nvmem_cell_entry_write() is called for an nvmem cell that does
not need bit shifting, it requires that the len parameter exactly
matches the nvmem cell size. However, when the nvmem cell has a nonzero
bit_offset, it was skipping this check.
Accepting values of len larger than the cell size results in
nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer() trying to write past the end of a heap
buffer that it allocates. Add a check to avoid that problem and instead
return -EINVAL when len doesn't match the number of bits expected by the
nvmem cell when bit_offset is nonzero.
This check uses cell->nbits in order to allow providing the smaller size
to cells that are shifted into another byte by bit_offset. For example,
a cell with nbits=8 and nonzero bit_offset would have bytes=2 but should
accept a 1-byte write here, although no current callers depend on this.
Fixes: 69aba7948cbe ("nvmem: Add a simple NVMEM framework for consumers")
Signed-off-by: Jennifer Berringer <jberring@redhat.com>
---
drivers/nvmem/core.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index 33ffa2aa4c11..4a5a6efe4bab 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -1780,6 +1780,8 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_entry_write(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell, void *buf, si
return -EINVAL;
if (cell->bit_offset || cell->nbits) {
+ if (len != BITS_TO_BYTES(cell->nbits) && len != cell->bytes)
+ return -EINVAL;
buf = nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(cell, buf, len);
if (IS_ERR(buf))
return PTR_ERR(buf);
--
2.46.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-04 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-04 15:23 [PATCH v3 0/3] nvmem: fix out-of-bounds reboot-mode write Jennifer Berringer
2024-11-04 15:23 ` Jennifer Berringer [this message]
2024-11-04 15:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] nvmem: core: add nvmem_cell_write_variable_u32() Jennifer Berringer
2024-12-14 15:07 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2024-12-20 19:39 ` Jennifer Berringer
2024-12-30 13:50 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2024-11-04 15:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] power: reset: nvmem-reboot-mode: fix write for small cells Jennifer Berringer
2024-11-11 22:07 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-12-20 16:48 ` (subset) [PATCH v3 0/3] nvmem: fix out-of-bounds reboot-mode write Srinivas Kandagatla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241104152312.3813601-2-jberring@redhat.com \
--to=jberring@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox