From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CCB83C38; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 05:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730785674; cv=none; b=Vwzehn665rCcb5fptUjxpy3nKzb9LlyRlWBb6ctZQjgShJNgKH9lijQnQDa/pCf91EU3Z92KfnxB2IDV3xcg9Wbx0+Re5tktf8yoybATAempZzXleFvOeA/dHi7dageTRbMUSAXquWwpzW7mbXD9g0FtkCnsUq+g60h+23Lv6fc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730785674; c=relaxed/simple; bh=saOb0LiiRQC8rwlm/4KpZ/40NSYsjlgBgeihQIDMbPU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MHmKAGevhn0bvArxQ88hhtIJbNhUPFqHn09EgNioBMN2GPr7VDf5sJ63UXZIiwPsBkOQnE8OXgW96qsZJTjmnP8yr9sCcqN/h/3YrcxWPaiViYYV+bDUGpHacSYfnN6thRGHTtThJZHDf2kASq9d/h82/VlNocNJiJaUDCEIiS0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ivQu1a5d; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ivQu1a5d" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1730785674; x=1762321674; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=saOb0LiiRQC8rwlm/4KpZ/40NSYsjlgBgeihQIDMbPU=; b=ivQu1a5dUJTUxqCQ6mcT9SBR7M53MCNnSxFisI3hTB9nwcoR2vxL9y+t skda7qvKaxhzjexY7tLSUKCpK+frBm2oIxr6bWuz63bR6+2ZwTcnAXzzQ hncIBTTo4Kyo3Kj4gb5oDCQkK2MFSC41RDuMs8LQdTv28aIA431EYLINj ZgP7o7ulIit15gglWiQWQt1MezPbKF01mQV8CpROBoyePuUfBt1iKGUJz jAt9t5iW4XtosrJPhR83/C6jC9POE4deSFaooYFvAtILK370CafpseWdM bXnSxYsJiX49xS8HPLItnJKeiYeiiqR9TAjBi1wpr2ZvdyfAYFvHSLt5j A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: UY/RA+yhTQ2gJjmJWT+AOQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: nmo/UcOpQtiR1uiUIiduEA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11246"; a="30628976" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,259,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="30628976" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2024 21:47:53 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: oigiAMzpRDuJfLOHm5k6Bw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OmbOSK3SSRSXw/+tDC6o1A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,259,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="83544454" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2024 21:47:52 -0800 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 822181E0; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 07:47:50 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 07:47:50 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the pinctrl-intel tree Message-ID: <20241105054750.GC275077@black.fi.intel.com> References: <20241105081154.54f66e15@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241105081154.54f66e15@canb.auug.org.au> Hi Stephen, On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 08:11:54AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Commits > > 1bedd6dc7f44 ("pinctrl: elkhartlake: Add support for DSW community") > 5d6f65a5cbbc ("pinctrl: intel: Add a human readable decoder for pull bias values") > > are missing a Signed-off-by from their committers. > > It looks like they were rebased back onto v6.12-rc1 (from -rc4) for some > reason, but the new commiter's SOB was missed. Thanks for letting me know! Yes we moved them back to -rc1 as this was requested by the GPIO maintainer. I will fix this now.