From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Francesco <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] driver core: fw_devlink: Stop trying to optimize cycle detection logic
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 05:52:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024110644-material-paternity-242f@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGETcx9MZbvg0ikfsWpJXYw=UzUjv3PerzN4RL1VFMjitBtYXw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 05:30:20PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:10 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > In attempting to optimize fw_devlink runtime, I introduced numerous cycle
> > detection bugs by foregoing cycle detection logic under specific
> > conditions. Each fix has further narrowed the conditions for optimization.
> >
> > It's time to give up on these optimization attempts and just run the cycle
> > detection logic every time fw_devlink tries to create a device link.
> >
> > The specific bug report that triggered this fix involved a supplier fwnode
> > that never gets a device created for it. Instead, the supplier fwnode is
> > represented by the device that corresponds to an ancestor fwnode.
> >
> > In this case, fw_devlink didn't do any cycle detection because the cycle
> > detection logic is only run when a device link is created between the
> > devices that correspond to the actual consumer and supplier fwnodes.
> >
> > With this change, fw_devlink will run cycle detection logic even when
> > creating SYNC_STATE_ONLY proxy device links from a device that is an
> > ancestor of a consumer fwnode.
> >
> > Reported-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1a1ab663-d068-40fb-8c94-f0715403d276@ideasonboard.com/
> > Fixes: 6442d79d880c ("driver core: fw_devlink: Improve detection of overlapping cycles")
> > Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/core.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> >
> > Tomi,
> >
> > Thanks for all the testing and debugging help! And do use
> > post-init-providers even with this patch to improve ordering
> > enforcement. I probably should change the cycle log from info to warn in
> > a separate patch :)
> >
> > Greg,
> >
> > I no longer have concerns about pulling this into 6.13. But we can give
> > a week or so to Geert/Francesco to do some additional testing.
> >
> > Geert/Francesco,
>
> Heads up. Greg has pulled this into driver-core git's
> driver-core-testing branch. Which means in a week or two it'll get
> into the actual driver-core-next branch. So, if you want to do
> additional testing, you might want to jump on it soon.
It should now show up in the next linux-next release.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-06 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-30 17:10 [PATCH v3] driver core: fw_devlink: Stop trying to optimize cycle detection logic Saravana Kannan
2024-11-06 1:30 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-11-06 4:52 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2024-11-19 13:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-20 2:04 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-11-20 8:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-12-04 11:48 ` Luca Ceresoli
2024-12-04 12:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-12-04 17:14 ` Luca Ceresoli
2024-12-06 9:31 ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-02-12 15:33 ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-02-13 8:08 ` Saravana Kannan
2025-01-06 15:16 ` Tomi Valkeinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024110644-material-paternity-242f@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=francesco.dolcini@toradex.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox