From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C9BB1DEFEA; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 08:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731055764; cv=none; b=PMDQkA/SGjERvNyvLbTPfz7DMrAgOGtnOQ2CV0vW5Q5/0BCS1Li6P9q7upP4It3clcmU8oEleDA/ntr6h0LibFOYJZXDvrKJMCEgsCH7nXxSuTIhvcuaFYQQX7KVC6nRCKstRPdL+68Lt5XoBMVsshG1lSy7pKhfQGyzScwnCis= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731055764; c=relaxed/simple; bh=l9sY1OHDO8wFIDCdzrR2/15Yw7PfigB1KCl3QZf41FE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ackmctKreuB32kSBwKiUUXKnYVxIgSxNbubWlD/cXz6RIK6F9m4CmlofBpn+ZiTHjzkepfFEjOk2LzfPOz/2HoR3lF+Xy087ExnNuRfYtcAHey4NYvPaL95BDdGc9UXtQrjKhCwZ2b3G9nq2IULSJhnxcLpNHsrFRYz6ynRbLAA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=h6zJ/Xvu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="h6zJ/Xvu" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B732C4CECD; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 08:49:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1731055763; bh=l9sY1OHDO8wFIDCdzrR2/15Yw7PfigB1KCl3QZf41FE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=h6zJ/XvuS7XXzK1Ct5OUSBE+f1pvTtZzKmi7E9ki5m3c0wZAT7xt5nOmJzLFRMGNY Ld60VNZ7EaU6PNpU114MBwrJ7l5r3qTSh/g9uSENTzgWcRQMo2pXbdyqaP1hbYcSxV lhRQqCJ8QApvyOAZUtineIyvF2vB32SnxBsUb//A= Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 09:49:20 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Fedor Pchelkin Cc: Sasha Levin , stable@vger.kernel.org, Alex Deucher , Harry Wentland , Leo Li , Rodrigo Siqueira , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , "Pan, Xinhui" , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Fangzhi Zuo , Wayne Lin , amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lvc-project@linuxtesting.org, Alexey Khoroshilov , Mario Limonciello , Jonathan Gray Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] On DRM -> stable process Message-ID: <2024110803-undermine-viewable-2605@gregkh> References: <20241029133141.45335-1-pchelkin@ispras.ru> <20241029-3ca95c1f41e96c39faf2e49a-pchelkin@ispras.ru> <20241104-61da90a19c561bb5ed63141b-pchelkin@ispras.ru> <2024110521-mummify-unloved-4f5d@gregkh> <20241108-267fb65587d32642092cea40-pchelkin@ispras.ru> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241108-267fb65587d32642092cea40-pchelkin@ispras.ru> On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 11:41:18AM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > On Tue, 05. Nov 07:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 05:55:28PM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > > > It is just strange that the (exact same) change made by the commits is > > > duplicated by backporting tools. As it is not the first case where DRM > > > patches are involved per Greg's statement [1], I wonder if something can be > > > done on stable-team's side to avoid such odd behavior in future. > > > > No, all of this mess needs to be fixed up on the drm developer's side, > > they are the ones doing this type of crazy "let's commit the same patch > > to multiple branches and then reference a commit that will show up at an > > unknown time in the future and hope for the best!" workflow. > > > > I'm amazed it works at all, they get to keep fixing up this mess as this > > is entirely self-inflicted. > > Thanks for reply, I get your remark. DRM people are mostly CC'ed here, > hopefully it won't be that difficult to tune their established workflow to > make the stable process easier and more straightforward. > > As of now, would you mind to take the revert for 6.1? It's [PATCH 1/1] in > this thread. No point to keep it there, and the duplicated commits were > already reverted from the fresher stable kernels. > I don't see it in my review queue anymore, can you please resend it? thanks, greg k-h